There is very little difference between--

[ScaringChildren]

Originally Posted by mickmoranis [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

speaking of social decay:

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

when did the open minded liberals become the puritanical conservatives?

YouTube moves to make conspiracy videos harder to find

"Looks like you've had too much to think, Citizen..."

Seriously, who gives a fuck about conspiracy theories? Why would you fight those?

The Left has become the authoritarian assholes who they accuse the Right of being.

[mickmoranis]

Originally Posted by ScaringChildren [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

YouTube moves to make conspiracy videos harder to find

"Looks like you've had too much to think, Citizen..."

Seriously, who gives a fuck about conspiracy theories? Why would you fight those?

The Left has become the authoritarian assholes who they accuse the Right of being.

libtards think watching conspiracy videos makes you a fundamentalist so they censor them.

what do fundamentalists do?

censor videos.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[ScaringChildren]

Originally Posted by mickmoranis [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

libtards think watching conspiracy videos makes you a fundamentalist so they censor them.

what do fundamentalists do?

censor videos.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Exactly.

They act like extreme authoritarians in order to theoretically prevent creating extreme authoritarians...

They don't mind creating extreme authoritarians, as long as they Leftists.

PRO TIP: Extreme authoritarians, period, are bad.

Leftists need to learn this simple fact. But they can't. Because they believe their shit doesn't stink.

[mickmoranis]

Originally Posted by mickmoranis [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

speaking of social decay:

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

when did the open minded liberals become the puritanical conservatives?

dont hide this image from the new page, that's censorship puritanical fundamentalism.

[rebeccablack]

removing them from recommended feeds is not "censoring" them. u can still find these videos if you search for them.

sorry ur flat earth and moon landing hoax videos dont play automatically for 12 year olds after watching nasa videos anymore

[ScaringChildren]

Originally Posted by rebeccablack [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

removing them from recommended feeds is not "censoring" them. u can still find these videos if you search for them.

sorry ur flat earth and moon landing hoax videos dont play automatically for 12 year olds after watching nasa videos anymore

It's essentially removing them.

It's in the same spirit of censorship.

What if YouTube stopped recommending LGBT videos? Hmm?

That would make you raise an eyebrow, would it not?

And who cares if a 12 year old stumbled upon a conspiracy theory video? Stop moral policing, you authoritarian fuck.

[rebeccablack]

Originally Posted by ScaringChildren [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

It's essentially removing them.

no it isnt. stop seeking out avenues to feel persecuted, thats sjw territory

And who cares if a 12 year old stumbled upon a conspiracy theory video? Stop moral policing, you authoritarian fuck.

private companies can do whatever they want with their content. if they feel that recommending this content to people who arent seeking it out isnt in their best interests that is their prerogative.

[mickmoranis]

Originally Posted by rebeccablack [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

private companies can do whatever they want with their content. if they feel that recommending this content to people who arent seeking it out isnt in their best interests that is their prerogative.

nobody is saying they cant.

Private individuals can and have every right to be racist, but you scream and cry about it all the time.

Its not about what you're allowed to do, its a question about what YOU are doing being moral or the type of behavior that fundamentalists show before they start killing people.

You're trying to elect a base of people who actively support censorship.

You want to get rid of the 2nd amendment.

you want to change the constitution constantly

the people who want to change the constitution, showing their hand as being fascists, is the real threat.

Not the people who you say are fascist, but want to protect the constitution and our bill of rights.

again, THIS is why nobody takes your childish side's arguments seriously, because they are not rational or make any sense whatsoever.

[ScaringChildren]

Originally Posted by rebeccablack [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

no it isnt. stop seeking out avenues to feel persecuted, thats sjw territory

private companies can do whatever they want with their content. if they feel that recommending this content to people who arent seeking it out isnt in their best interests that is their prerogative.

I'd bet you'd be singing a different tune if it affected you at all.

All I'm asking for is a little unbiased judgment.

When you have colleges threatening to arrest you if you step on their campus because you're Conservative, you start to see there are two sets of rules.

Conservatives are second class citizens.

[feniin]

Originally Posted by ScaringChildren [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I'd bet you'd be singing a different tune if it affected you at all.

All I'm asking for is a little unbiased judgment.

When you have colleges threatening to arrest you if you step on their campus because you're Conservative, you start to see there are two sets of rules.

Conservatives are second class citizens.

Should honestly be third class. Not fair to the second class to include them in the same group as conservatives