There is very little difference between--

[ScaringChildren]

Originally Posted by rebeccablack [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

removing them from recommended feeds is not "censoring" them. u can still find these videos if you search for them.

sorry ur flat earth and moon landing hoax videos dont play automatically for 12 year olds after watching nasa videos anymore

It's essentially removing them.

It's in the same spirit of censorship.

What if YouTube stopped recommending LGBT videos? Hmm?

That would make you raise an eyebrow, would it not?

And who cares if a 12 year old stumbled upon a conspiracy theory video? Stop moral policing, you authoritarian fuck.

[mickmoranis]

Originally Posted by mickmoranis [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

speaking of social decay:

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

when did the open minded liberals become the puritanical conservatives?

dont hide this image from the new page, that's censorship puritanical fundamentalism.

[feniin]

Why are you trying to regulate what a business is doing with their service?

[mickmoranis]

Are you tryign to whatabout me right now?

You're trying to say that you behaving literally like a puritanical, nazi or evangelical fundamentalist, is somehow the same as me trying to defend the constitution?

This is why people dont take you and anyone you agree with seriously, because you fail to the stupid ass non compete in your comparisons when you try to justify you'r stupid ass behavior.

[Wonkie]

Originally Posted by maskedmelon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You're right, I didn't know "social decay" is a hallmark of fascist rhetoric, but I don't care either. I'm not interested in fascist rhetoric. I don't think things and then go, "shit that guy who believes things that I do not thought this same thing, therefore I must be mistaken!" ^o^ See the spoon analogy along with the rest of my treatment of the broken reasoning beneath Ald's argument, my explanation of what I mean when I say "social decay," and Patriam's expansive post on what bad behavior looks like and why shame matters. We should be ashamed when we do wrong and it is our responsibility to hold one another accountable. That doesn't mean we should shame one another for innocuous behavior and it should be obvious that shaming good behavior is hallmark of a broken mind.

It is immoral to allow others, particularly those closest to us, to destroy themselves because we are too cowardly to engage in confrontation or let them quietly compromise their long term livelihood because we are too selfish to assume responsibility for hurting them or impinging their liberties in the short term. Can this line of reasoning be perverted? Absolutely, but so can anything else. You don't throw things away because they were touched by someone nasty though.

well now you know

and knowing is half the battle

[mickmoranis]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[rebeccablack]

Originally Posted by ScaringChildren [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

It's essentially removing them.

no it isnt. stop seeking out avenues to feel persecuted, thats sjw territory

And who cares if a 12 year old stumbled upon a conspiracy theory video? Stop moral policing, you authoritarian fuck.

private companies can do whatever they want with their content. if they feel that recommending this content to people who arent seeking it out isnt in their best interests that is their prerogative.

[Irulan]

Originally Posted by ScaringChildren [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

It's essentially removing them.

It's in the same spirit of censorship.

What if YouTube stopped recommending LGBT videos? Hmm?

That would make you raise an eyebrow, would it not?

And who cares if a 12 year old stumbled upon a conspiracy theory video? Stop moral policing, you authoritarian fuck.

It was actually pushing lgbt, particularly trans stuff off the feed and demonitizing most during 2014-17. Those channels ran through a different system then billybobs hardware and chicken roasting school. So, ya, stop asking for special treatment buttercup. Also requiring opt in age consent. Or parental filters.

The policies probably did change tho.

Alex Jones would make a gr8 faggit tho. That is muh free speech. It is worth exactly zero dollars.

Also big difference between demonitizing and censorship. U can pay to broadcast whatever u want like a real American captain of industry would.

[Irulan]

I am going to write a radically inclusive article about the Georgia guidstones, Mormons, polygamy, capitalism, free associations, and not relying on faggits like stallin or jeff bezos to feed u and that u all have a right to be one of your tribe that survives the culling.

Yall gonna have to earn it tho

[Irulan]

I bet i am one of those "people" who can get censured for like basically every thing simultaneously.