|
|
|
|
#2
04-02-2011, 04:41 PM
|
|||
|
With that being said, you will see any video that doesn't involve white people as racist, if I made a video slamming Iraq about fostering an extremist and fundamentalist atmosphere and is filled an auditorium with people in Hijabs screaming death to American imperialism especially in the wake of 24 UN peacekeepers being slaughtered to those said "extremists" you'd probably see this as me hatemongering towards Islamic people because not every Muslim is an extremist...
Even though that was not the point I was stressing, you would see it as that and that is the problem with over-sensibility, it's like we cannot slam another country based on their behavior or actions if that country has cultural differences than us, and that's a shame that many groups of people can do as they wish and receive zero flak when the tables are turned but if it's good ole' America making pejorative statements about a foreign policy, or a group of people then America is being racist and or intolerant. | ||
|
|
|||
|
#3
04-02-2011, 04:57 PM
|
|||
|
I'm also going to take the liberty to post every country that the U.S has taken the same stance as the one in that video, in short these are countries we've vilified over the years:
England Spain Germany Russia USSR Japan China Mexico Italy Vietnam Cuba Columbia Iraq Afghanistan Libya Egypt Syria I mean the list goes on, and with each of these countries we've popped out hateful, scathing, politically motivated media to discredit these nations, and to make them more of a threat than what they really were/are. It also had nothing to do with race, and everything to do with a superiority complex that has been backed up with the notion of "might makes right" our country never gave a shit about what ethnic group we were offending because it doesn't matter to the machine what color skin you have, or what language you speak because when the U.S pops out media like this it's made specifically to foster nationalism and to showcase our superiority because we're "stronger, richer, tougher, and more liberal" than our rivals. With that said the only slight resemblance that this video would have with Nazi Propaganda has nothing to do with Jewish people, but everything about a country trying to show superiority through force. | ||
|
|
|||
|
#4
04-02-2011, 06:37 PM
|
|||
|
To make it easier for you:
There are two tribes, one to the far north and one to the far south, the north tribe lives in a rocky forested region rich with minerals, lumber, and fairer weather. The group to the south lives in a desert basin. The south tribe living in an area with such a disadvantage has to eek out what shelter and protection they can, so they're building houses out of reeds, sticks, mud and rock, as this is their only resource in the area. They easily thrive because they build near rivers so they have irrigation systems and clean water at all times. The tribe to the north has the benefit of living in a secluded area, building houses out of stone, hard lumber, and animal pelt. They thrive due to the variety of their area, hunting game, foraging, making elaborate weapons and traps for the purpose of killing animals. These two tribes eventually clash over a middle region, the southern tribe who has mostly been a fishing/agricultural society loses in combat to the northern tribe because the northern tribe has perfected stone weaponry, projectiles, and is more adapted to surviving on the go than the southern tribe who has simply settled into a river. The southern tribe goes back with the loss but they learn how to make stone weaponry and now use that knowledge to change their society based on the northern tribes advancements so next they clash they are on equal footing. The northern tribe sees this as an issue, so they use harder substances for weaponry leaving behind stone and bone they begin to dig deeper finding harder stones and finally copper, they melt this copper down and pound it out to have a sharp edge which has the ability to cut through stick, stone, and bone. With that advancement they're able to push the south back again because the southern tribe cannot compete with this advancement and even worse the southern tribe doesn't have any form of copper to match par. The northern tribe begins to fight within itself, moving from copper to iron, from iron to steel just to fight for dominance because the northern tribe has the advantage of resource they out-progress the southern tribe entirely as they're still stick and stone and now the northern tribes are competing with other northern tribes to which each side makes an advancement which is then emulated and improved upon. | ||
|
|
|||
|
#5
04-03-2011, 12:36 AM
|
|||
|
Did you actually read the Diamond book, Abacab? If you did, your reading comprehension is shit.
The biggest differences were beasts of burden and the direction of trade routes. Africa and South America both have shitloads of mineral resources, but they didn't have good animals to help with physical labor and the north to south orientation of both continents made it hard to migrate with familiar crops. In contrast, Europe and Asia developed with multiple species of large domesticated mammals and the trade routes developed along longitudinal lines. | ||
|
|
|||
|
#6
04-03-2011, 12:45 AM
|
||||
|
Quote:
You're trying to knock me for a simplistic example that only scratches 1% of the reason why certain societies by-passed others, I don't have the time to write a 110 page thesis over human progress from the stone age and on, but if you missed my point that "some areas have advantages over others" and that greatly influenced the way society was forged then the only thing you're doing right now is trolling. | |||
|
|
||||
|
#7
04-03-2011, 12:57 AM
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#8
04-03-2011, 12:41 AM
|
|||
|
Oh and uh.. wehrmacht... I guess you're right. Science is a bitch, and I'm not politically correct: It must be hard for you to swallow that there's almost no (i.e. nothing of importance) genetic difference between you and a black person or an indian or whatever group you have beef with, which from your posting history seems to be blacks but who knows... so you have to proliferate lies and hatred to make yourself feel better.
Go get cozy in your bed tonight, put a gun in your mouth, and pull the trigger because the world would be better without faggots like you. | ||
|
|
|||
|
#9
04-03-2011, 12:54 AM
|
||||
|
Quote:
Two white people can have a black baby, just as two black people can have a white baby, because if anywhere down your genetic line be it from a century ago or ten thousand years ago that there is a genetic trait resembling of people from certain areas of the world (asia, africa, native america etc.) it can resurface at any given time. Genes are genes, it's not race because if people were totally different nothing could be mingled, just like a St. Bernard and a Beagle are both dogs it's just selective breeding that made them different, it's only the genes and both those species can mate cause genetically they're the same. Racism wouldn't even be the word, it's more like culuralist because we only hate people that don't adhere to our moral standards and the reason some people hate blacks, or asians, or even hispanics comes from a self-gratifying thought that our culture is superior. | |||
|
|
||||
|
#10
04-03-2011, 01:18 AM
|
||||
|
Quote:
I take it you don't believe in the "out of africa" theory then. | |||
|
|
||||
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
