My Theory About Why Feminism is Currently Irrelevent to Millenials

[mickmoranis]

Originally Posted by Lulz~Sect [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Literally work in a office with 90% women and god forbid you correct one of those approAching her chIldless 30s with senior in her title. Micro-aggression central lol

Love this underrated quote cracks me up.

My fave thing about feminism is the average woman loves reality TV shows because they cant get enough of watching people acting disgusting.

But they throw art in the garbage because they think someone is a sexual deviant own their own time in their own bedroom.

[loramin]

Originally Posted by maskedmelon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You think discrimination leads disproportionate numbers of blacks to prison? Adopt black children.

I think there's something deeply offensive about suggesting that one race can solve another race's problems by adopting their children. Check your history books: we did exactly that to the Native Americans, quite literally taking their children away from them to solve their problems (as savages). It didn't work, but it ruined lots of lives.

Racial issues in America are far too massive and pervasive for a few do gooder white people to solve them.

Originally Posted by mickmoranis [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

My fave thing about feminism is the average woman loves reality TV shows because they cant get enough of watching people acting disgusting.

But they throw art in the garbage because they think someone is a sexual deviant own their own time in their own bedroom.

I honestly have no idea what you're saying there: how do you go from terrible reality TV to judging art by the actions of its creator?

[mickmoranis]

Originally Posted by loramin [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I honestly have no idea what you're saying there: how do you go from terrible reality TV to judging art by the actions of its creator?

The point I am trying to make is, LCK has a kink, so his carrier is over, his comedy is done.

However the same group of people that do not approve of LCK will watch people act disgusting in reality tv and not bat an eye.

The bacholar is FAR more sexist than anything LCK has ever done, but we go after the comedian himself because we do not approve of his sexual deviance.

Deviance is all he perpetrated, he had a kink. An overweight bald man, uses his success and hard work to make himself attractive to the opposite sex, he offers a sexual act, they say yes or no, he obliges and understands if they say no and doesn't pressure them... and then we find out, and ruin his carrier.

Yet, we give human scum on reality tv shows a pass, cus its a guilty pleasure.

Sickening society. Low brow society. Garbage society. That's all modern feminism breeds.

[loramin]

Originally Posted by mickmoranis [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

the same group of people that do not approve of LCK will watch people act disgusting in reality tv and not bat an eye.

A) People on reality TV shows don't whip their dick out.

B) Consent matters: LCK whipped his dick out and started masturbating (something deeply disturbing to watch) in front of women who had absolutely no desire to see such a thing. The worst non-consensual thing people in reality shows do is throw water in each other's faces

C) When reality TV did have a non-consensual "moment" (eg. that Bachelor hot tub drama not too long ago) they nearly shut the whole show down, and if it had been more clear cut they probably would have.

[mickmoranis]

Originally Posted by loramin [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

A) People on reality TV shows don't whip their dick out.

B) Consent matters: LCK whipped his dick out and started masturbating (something deeply disturbing to watch) in front of women who had absolutely no desire to see such a thing. The worst non-consensual thing people in reality shows do is throw water in each other's faces

C) When reality TV did have a non-consensual "moment" (eg. that Bachelor hot tub drama not too long ago) they nearly shut the whole show down, and if it had been more clear cut they probably would have.

A) he asked consent got it, then said OK when he didnt. So what more do you want?
B) this is false.
C) A show about 100 women pleasing a man, is far more supportive of the patriarchy than what one guy who defends social justice in his comedy does in his bedroom with people he has no power over other than their love of what he personally creates, comedy.

I Just want you to see what type of bullshit you are being fed that makes you missunderstand what actually happened in the bedrooms of other people (to illstrate point B)

In a statement released on Friday, the comedian tried to explain why he’d exposed his penis and masturbated in front of several nonconsenting women over a period of several years. “At the time, I said to myself that what I did was okay because I never showed a woman my dick without asking first,” he wrote, claiming he never learned until it was “too late” that power differentials could make those women feel overpowered or coerced.

here you see the same libcuckery where they say it was nonconsenting in teh same sentence where they say he always asked for consent.

Gimi a fuckn break. This shit is hilarious, you are being played hard by 35 year old female cucks who cant have babies anymore cus they spent too much of their youth being fat and blaming men for their problems.

[maskedmelon]

Originally Posted by loramin [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I think there's something deeply offensive about suggesting that one race can solve another race's problems by adopting their children.

i didn't suggest that. the point I was attempting to make was a very simple one: if you believe blacks are hobbled by discrimination, do everything you can to remove discrimination. does that make sense?

there are many children without parents of various races. why not provide a positive environment for one? it is racist to suggest that your ability to help one or another is predicated on the color of either of your skins. i was suggesting that your impatiaty is what would enable you to create an environment free of discrimination. something that is not predicated on the color of one's skin.

Check your history books: we did exactly that to the Native Americans, quite literally taking their children away from them to solve their problems (as savages). It didn't work, but it ruined lots of lives.

mhmm, see above. why not do something to create a positive environment for someone rather than blame others?

Racial issues in America are far too massive and pervasive for a few do gooder white people to solve them.

Indeed, it is far less work to fabricate an insurmountable foe to lament than it is to invest incremental sacrifice in meaningful action.

[loramin]

Originally Posted by maskedmelon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

i didn't suggest that. the point I was attempting to make was a very simple one: if you believe blacks are hobbled by discrimination, do everything you can to remove discrimination. does that make sense?

The way that you suggested one could "do everything ... to remove discrimination" was to adopt African-American children . I strongly disagree that adopting other culture's children is a valid strategy to "better" that culture, and as I pointed out historically that approach has never helped solve discrimination. In fact, quite to the contrary, it has a very ugly and racist history behind it.

... but I do agree that, as long as you don't push failed racist policies as a way to combat racism, your larger point that people should speak less and do more is totally valid [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[maskedmelon]

Originally Posted by loramin [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

"Never ascribe to malice that which can be explained by incompetence." Honestly I thought my posts did respond to your's.



Did you not say:



er ... well ... I guess not, because now that post has been edited to instead say:


... which is what I was arguing (that the best way to fight discrimination is through thought leadership).

However I promise that if you tell me which point I'm not responding to (and then don't change it) I'll do my best to honestly respond to it.

I didn't change it, it's still there with both of those excerpts back on page 4, post 39:

Originally Posted by maskedmelon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

identity politics and minority activism in America is a perfect example of fabricated struggle to restore some measure of the purpose civilization has denied each of us. If you're able to find purpose in subordinating various groups and then fighting fictitious battles on their behalf, more power to you, but it is no less deluded than worshiping a supernatural bean. Neither is anything more than assignation of one's grief to fictitious sources. it's a retreat to fantasy from the assault of reality.

man has no worth, no use, no purpose other than the one he elects for himself. stop fucking with others and assume responsibility for making yourself happy and if you can't, make someone else happy.

you think women are insufficiently compensated in the workplace? start a business and pay them what you feel is right. You think its wrong to abort unwanted pregnancies? start a non-profit and popularize the idea. You think discrimination leads disproportionate numbers of blacks to prison? Adopt black children. You think people should be compelled to use restrooms based on their sex chromosomes? Build restrooms protected by check stations. you think everyone should be entitled to free and equal healthcare? find a stranger and pay for theirs. you think various races are inferior to one another? write a book.

All of that would require WORK though, REAL sacrifice. No, I think I'll just use my blue pen in this box to compel others to do what I want, or maybe I'll go to church and "give my problems to god," or maybe i'll stand outside places I disagree with holding signs to deny patrons and owners happiness, because at the end of the day it doesn't matter if i accomplish anything other than validating my own meaningless existence with simple low-effort placating of conscience. shared delusion is most comforting delusion.



*sorry, this has nothing to do with sandwiches. i'll try to catch up entirely before forming thoughts in the future.

perhaps this sheds some light on why, I haven't been making sense ^.~

In any case, I wouldn't continue talking with you for several pages about adopting children if I didn't say it. ^^ That's not the issue.

The issue is more one of "one vs. all."

Reading back through my posts I can see why I wasn't making sense. I was being too indirect in an attempt to be as concise as possible. i fail miserably at summarizing, but will try here again:

I am suggesting that a person can cause certain decrease in total discrimination by eliminating it for [/i]individuals[/i] (not all individuals, just the one(s) you adopt and only for a time).

You have been arguing against mass adoptions to end all racism or racial problems.

So to hopefully put to rest that proposition against which you have been arguing, I TOTALLY agree that mass adopting all black children to white families or any other families is neither sensible nor practical. it is not an antidote to racism and is not something that i advocate.



However,


if you, as a person (your race doesn't matter, you can be red or brown or orange or yellow or pink or black or teal or whatever), believe that blacks suffer disproportionate discrimination, you can decrease the total amount of discrimination by eliminating it for one person (for a time) by adopting a child. In your home, the child would not experience discrimination. You could choose who they associated with, which schools they attended and the media they consumed and they would have no inkling of discrimination.

On top of not having to grow up with discrimination (which is perhaps the most damaging aspect due to complexes that can arise out of it), THEY will be empowered to succeed in spite of it. You'll not have slain the phantom of discrimination, but you'll have changed one person's life.

[Pokesan]

my bowl cut detector is going nuts

[Lulz~Sect]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]