Rotation RNF Thread

[getsome]

Next time I will give 60 days notice, sorry 30 days was not enough.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Originally Posted by Breaken [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Yes, we were given about a 10 hour ultimatum. And I didn't ignore the comment. I replied:

Originally Posted by Kagey [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

making a snap decision the day before a server downtime? And forcing o's to do it by midnight, or they take a full respawn from us in VP. Why did this need to be done by midnight? like rustle/csg was not up next so what does it matter

You dont see how this is messed up? its beside the point though.

My point is any breaking of rotation will be done on awakened's turn. Its a ticking time bomb where we will get hit the most.

Originally Posted by Erati [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

not even enough time to hold a guild poll whether others would be truely offended if Rustle got a solo spot.

thanks for the courtesy of 10 hours to amend the agreement that had been functioning for several months

A week leading up to CSG/Rustle's spot where we could have been tasked with this choice would have been proper since they opted to go in the slot after CSG anyway. Seems they saw a VP spawn for the taking and are grandstanding this as Awakened stiffing them a slot.

[maskedmelon]

Originally Posted by getsome [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Next time I will give 60 days notice, sorry 30 days was not enough.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

This was spectacular ^^ Float an idea, afford your counterparts to be forthright, threaten a punch to the throat when they ignore you and the. Punch when the don't respond ^^

This is how progress is made. A+ for having someone who knows how to move things forward ^^

[Vianna]

Originally Posted by getsome [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Next time I will give 60 days notice, sorry 30 days was not enough.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Underrated post in the thread. Shows the BS Awakened spews repeatedly to try to save face on this server.

[Erati]

Originally Posted by Vianna [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Underrated post in the thread. Shows the BS Awakened spews repeatedly to try to save face on this server.

im sorry what exactly is Getsome trying to prove with this picture? Anyone can float an idea casually to create a record of ced idea for posting later.

Why would Awakened suddenly have to amend an agreement bc someone doesnt agree with how the rotation was functioning and wanted more?

Why is it Awakened's issue that Rustle got 'too big' and thusly needed its own slot? This screenshot proves nothing besides the fact that Getsome at the end of August wanted more VP loot for his guild and was voicing that. Pretty big difference between voicing an idea of potential changes versus informing other parties in an agreement that they no longer will follow the current structure of what has been agreed too. What did Getsome even offer as a sweetner to make a 4 way split of VP easier to swallow to Awakened's members who did not like splitting the zone in the first place?

I will await another screenshot of ced offer but I wont hold my breath bc no offer existed...

So to recap, Rustle which started off as a casual 'we're only interested in raiding here and there guild', forced its way into both the VP and Ring 10 rotation, recruited too many players who wanted to raid, realized they couldnt and didnt want to continue sharing a VP spot with CSG, expected their own slot on no other merits besides ability to raid solo, offered no concessions to acquire the slot ( outside of going last in current order ), breaks the rotation the first chance an Awakened cycle presented itself and now plays the victim ????

I am sorry your guild got too large to share VP but its incredibly rude to break an agreement in this manner and BLAME us when you guys got Awakened's PD heh. Basically burning up any amount of good faith that was build from the agreement and just made it so Awakened's leadership will have to think twice about ever trusting Rustle's word.

If they actually wanted their own slot, they could have been discussing it right now this week leading up to CSG/Rustles rotation, a lot of good faith was tossed out when we were threatened and those threats acted upon this repop.

[Gimp]

Originally Posted by Erati [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

im sorry what exactly is Getsome trying to prove with this picture? Anyone can float an idea casually to create a record of ced idea for posting later.

Why would Awakened suddenly have to amend an agreement bc someone doesnt agree with how the rotation was functioning and wanted more?

Why is it Awakened's issue that Rustle got 'too big' and thusly needed its own slot? This screenshot proves nothing besides the fact that Getsome at the end of August wanted more VP loot for his guild and was voicing that. Pretty big difference between voicing an idea of potential changes versus informing other parties in an agreement that they no longer will follow the current structure of what has been agreed too. What did Getsome even offer as a sweetner to make a 4 way split of VP easier to swallow to Awakened's members who did not like splitting the zone in the first place?

I will await another screenshot of ced offer but I wont hold my breath bc no offer existed...

So to recap, Rustle which started off as a casual 'we're only interested in raiding here and there guild', forced its way into both the VP and Ring 10 rotation, recruited too many players who wanted to raid, realized they couldnt and didnt want to continue sharing a VP spot with CSG, expected their own slot on no other merits besides ability to raid solo, offered no concessions to acquire the slot ( outside of going last in current order ), breaks the rotation the first chance an Awakened cycle presented itself and now plays the victim ????

I am sorry your guild got too large to share VP but its incredibly rude to break an agreement in this manner and BLAME us when you guys got Awakened's PD heh. Basically burning up any amount of good faith that was build from the agreement and just made it so Awakened's leadership will have to think twice about ever trusting Rustle's word.

If they actually wanted their own slot, they could have been discussing it right now this week leading up to CSG/Rustles rotation, a lot of good faith was tossed out when we were threatened and those threats acted upon this repop.

Seems to me he tried that a month ago, no?

[skarlorn]

Originally Posted by Erati [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

im sorry what exactly is Getsome trying to prove with this picture? Anyone can float an idea casually to create a record of ced idea for posting later.

Why would Awakened suddenly have to amend an agreement bc someone doesnt agree with how the rotation was functioning and wanted more?

Why is it Awakened's issue that Rustle got 'too big' and thusly needed its own slot? This screenshot proves nothing besides the fact that Getsome at the end of August wanted more VP loot for his guild and was voicing that. Pretty big difference between voicing an idea of potential changes versus informing other parties in an agreement that they no longer will follow the current structure of what has been agreed too. What did Getsome even offer as a sweetner to make a 4 way split of VP easier to swallow to Awakened's members who did not like splitting the zone in the first place?

I will await another screenshot of ced offer but I wont hold my breath bc no offer existed...

So to recap, Rustle which started off as a casual 'we're only interested in raiding here and there guild', forced its way into both the VP and Ring 10 rotation, recruited too many players who wanted to raid, realized they couldnt and didnt want to continue sharing a VP spot with CSG, expected their own slot on no other merits besides ability to raid solo, offered no concessions to acquire the slot ( outside of going last in current order ), breaks the rotation the first chance an Awakened cycle presented itself and now plays the victim ????

I am sorry your guild got too large to share VP but its incredibly rude to break an agreement in this manner and BLAME us when you guys got Awakened's PD heh. Basically burning up any amount of good faith that was build from the agreement and just made it so Awakened's leadership will have to think twice about ever trusting Rustle's word.

If they actually wanted their own slot, they could have been discussing it right now this week leading up to CSG/Rustles rotation, a lot of good faith was tossed out when we were threatened and those threats acted upon this repop.

Originally Posted by Gimp [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

They were, and they (along with BDA) killed the rotation because they felt that they deserved more than the other guilds in the rotation.

Which makes all of what Erati's said in the past few posts an absolute joke.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I can also confirm that the most seedy players I've run into have been in Taken. They are the type of people to poopsock Ragefire and not offer heart when a level appropriate cleric tries to quest their own up

[Sarl]

Originally Posted by Erati [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

im sorry what exactly is Getsome trying to prove with this picture? Anyone can float an idea casually to create a record of ced idea for posting later.

Why would Awakened suddenly have to amend an agreement bc someone doesnt agree with how the rotation was functioning and wanted more?

Why is it Awakened's issue that Rustle got 'too big' and thusly needed its own slot? This screenshot proves nothing besides the fact that Getsome at the end of August wanted more VP loot for his guild and was voicing that. Pretty big difference between voicing an idea of potential changes versus informing other parties in an agreement that they no longer will follow the current structure of what has been agreed too. What did Getsome even offer as a sweetner to make a 4 way split of VP easier to swallow to Awakened's members who did not like splitting the zone in the first place?

I will await another screenshot of ced offer but I wont hold my breath bc no offer existed...

So to recap, Rustle which started off as a casual 'we're only interested in raiding here and there guild', forced its way into both the VP and Ring 10 rotation, recruited too many players who wanted to raid, realized they couldnt and didnt want to continue sharing a VP spot with CSG, expected their own slot on no other merits besides ability to raid solo, offered no concessions to acquire the slot ( outside of going last in current order ), breaks the rotation the first chance an Awakened cycle presented itself and now plays the victim ????

I am sorry your guild got too large to share VP but its incredibly rude to break an agreement in this manner and BLAME us when you guys got Awakened's PD heh. Basically burning up any amount of good faith that was build from the agreement and just made it so Awakened's leadership will have to think twice about ever trusting Rustle's word.

If they actually wanted their own slot, they could have been discussing it right now this week leading up to CSG/Rustles rotation, a lot of good faith was tossed out when we were threatened and those threats acted upon this repop.

Woot

[Stormfists]

Originally Posted by Erati [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

im sorry what exactly is Getsome trying to prove with this picture? Anyone can float an idea casually to create a record of ced idea for posting later.

Why would Awakened suddenly have to amend an agreement bc someone doesnt agree with how the rotation was functioning and wanted more?

Why is it Awakened's issue that Rustle got 'too big' and thusly needed its own slot? This screenshot proves nothing besides the fact that Getsome at the end of August wanted more VP loot for his guild and was voicing that. Pretty big difference between voicing an idea of potential changes versus informing other parties in an agreement that they no longer will follow the current structure of what has been agreed too. What did Getsome even offer as a sweetner to make a 4 way split of VP easier to swallow to Awakened's members who did not like splitting the zone in the first place?

I will await another screenshot of ced offer but I wont hold my breath bc no offer existed...

So to recap, Rustle which started off as a casual 'we're only interested in raiding here and there guild', forced its way into both the VP and Ring 10 rotation, recruited too many players who wanted to raid, realized they couldnt and didnt want to continue sharing a VP spot with CSG, expected their own slot on no other merits besides ability to raid solo, offered no concessions to acquire the slot ( outside of going last in current order ), breaks the rotation the first chance an Awakened cycle presented itself and now plays the victim ????

I am sorry your guild got too large to share VP but its incredibly rude to break an agreement in this manner and BLAME us when you guys got Awakened's PD heh. Basically burning up any amount of good faith that was build from the agreement and just made it so Awakened's leadership will have to think twice about ever trusting Rustle's word.

If they actually wanted their own slot, they could have been discussing it right now this week leading up to CSG/Rustles rotation, a lot of good faith was tossed out when we were threatened and those threats acted upon this repop.

This many words = upset.

Taken were dog shit when it mattered. Anyone worth their salt knows this.

Edit - just to rub you, I sit in your batphone and leech your pop calls. So far have ganked 4 mobs without even tracking, thanks [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]. Have fun figuring out what guild I'm in kekekekeke.

[Kagey]

making a snap decision the day before a server downtime? And forcing o's to do it by midnight, or they take a full respawn from us in VP. Why did this need to be done by midnight? like rustle/csg was not up next so what does it matter

You dont see how this is messed up? its beside the point though.

My point is any breaking of rotation will be done on awakened's turn. Its a ticking time bomb where we will get hit the most.

[Vianna]

Originally Posted by Kagey [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

making a snap decision the day before a server downtime? And forcing o's to do it by midnight, or they take a full respawn from us in VP. Why did this need to be done by midnight? like rustle/csg was not up next so what does it matter

You dont see how this is messed up? its beside the point though.

My point is any breaking of rotation will be done on awakened's turn. Its a ticking time bomb where we will get hit the most.

What in the world. Crying publicly is never good form.