Trump's Valor

[Lune]

Originally Posted by fash [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Faux libertarians like Johnson are a far cry worse than a Trump though. Vote Johnson for rapefugee.



Changing the rules of engagement and laws of war is exactly what Trump proposed in the video (and elsewhere). You currently can't seize oil fields under the Geneva Convention.

Again, the DoD (and the general public) is not going comply with Trump ordering them to commit warcrimes (and that's assuming he isn't just talking out of his ass). The alt-right window-licking 4channers that inhabit this forum might find it tasteful to kill ISIS's families, but the international community does not.

Originally Posted by fash [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

A trillion dollars in oil is something.

Oil smuggling is the big source of revenue for ISIS. The US has refrained from targeting oil facilities since many civilians in the area rely on ISIS oil. Russia and France (and maybe US now?) have begun targeting oil facilities/transports in the last half year in order to cut off that revenue. Entirely seizing the oil fields would have a greater impact on ISIS's revenue.

Its effectiveness depends on how many troops are required. Elsewhere, I recall Trump saying he'd seize the oil with a few troops. If intelligence indicates that's possible, seizing may be an effective tactic.

Syria does not have even close to a trillion dollars in oil reserves. Syria has 2.5 billion barrels of proven oil reserves (not all of which is controlled by ISIS). The current price of oil is around $40 a barrel, which comes out to $100 billion. To put that in perspective, the Iraq war has cost $1.7 trillion. Even if you assume Trump "makes some smart deals" and a war with ISIS only costs 1/10 what Iraq cost, which is unrealistic, it's still a stupid and unprofitable idea. If we plunder all their oil quickly to minimize the cost of the war, we flood the market with oil and the price plunges-- we're one of the world's leading oil producers, and that would be devastating.

Occupying their oil fields is a fucking stupid idea. Iraqi insurgents, Taliban, and the Vietcong didn't have access to oil revenue and they were still able to conduct costly insurgencies.

[maskedmelon]

Originally Posted by Lune [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Trump doesn't believe sandwich mold exists even though it's a consensus among the entire scientific and academic community that it, in fact, does. Trump is willing to accept scientific consensus for other important things like how to manage cholesterol, treat cancer, or run a business/economy. But in the case of sandwich mold, an entire party has special interests pulling the strings and he bends over to comply. He proposes that we don't bother putting sandwiches in the fridge because sandwich mold isn't real and if we put our sandwiches in the fridge we won't be able to compete with China, which doesn't have fridges.

Very high quality post and excellent analogy. I think I still might prefer a moldy, shit-free sandwich over the shit sandwich though :/ However, as I have indicated, Trump sandwiches run the very real chance of being both shitty and moldy :/


Nevertheless, it is important to note that while I do not care to have shit or sand in my sandwiches, nor do I care for the ilicit practices or adverse conditions giving rise to such a nefarious malady as is sandwich mold, I worry little of sandwich mold itself.

Sandwich mold's most pronounce effects are associated with long term exposure. Since there will be no young melons to worry about and populations most severely affected are likely those whom will suffer disproportionately due to the forthcoming age of automation anyway, I am at worst indifferent to sandwich mold and at best mildly hopeful. ^^

[Raev]

Yeah I don't understand how anyone could think that occupying the Middle East could possibly be a good idea. The only way that would work is if we literally killed every Arab man, woman, and child we found on sight. I don't think anyone is seriously considering that.

A far better plan would be to quarantine the Muslim disease in Arabia and give huge tax incentives to renewable energy use (not production, which just leads to idiot corruption/theft like Solyndra) until we are no longer dependent on their oil, at which point the Muslim world can fade back into the 8th century irrelevance that they enjoyed until recently.

[big_ole_jpn]

Originally Posted by Lune [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Iraqi insurgents, Taliban, and the Vietcong didn't have access to oil revenue and they were still able to conduct costly insurgencies.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Raev]

Originally Posted by Lune [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Trump doesn't believe sandwich mold exists even though it's a consensus among the entire scientific and academic community that it, in fact, does. Trump is willing to accept scientific consensus for other important things like how to manage cholesterol, treat cancer, or run a business/economy. But in the case of sandwich mold, an entire party has special interests pulling the strings and he bends over to comply. He proposes that we don't bother putting sandwiches in the fridge because sandwich mold isn't real and if we put our sandwiches in the fridge we won't be able to compete with China, which doesn't have fridges.

Even if we assume for the sake of argument that anthropogenic global warming is a 100% certainty (and I still think it's unbelievably stupid to trust a group of people who say they can simulate a chaotic system, regardless of how many PhDs they give themselves), so what?

Do you seriously think world leaders will agree to make real cuts in CO2 production when the global economy is even now melting down under a mountain of debt? And even if by some miracle emissions were slashed 25%, how much of an effect do you really think it will have?

Conclusion: if AGW is real, it's baked into the cake already regardless of what Trump, Hillary, or anyone else tries to do.

[Slathar]

Originally Posted by Nihilist_santa [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I dont think you understand how higher education works. I will break this down for you.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

another hilarious image from 2006. D- but you can resubmit it again after you finish your criminal justice associates.

[Nihilist_santa]

Originally Posted by Slathar [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

another hilarious image from 2006. D- but you can resubmit it again after you finish your criminal justice associates.

Says dude playing a 17 year old elf sim and salty as fuck about it. Still plan on being the last person on red? You are definitely on track if diabeetus doesnt slay you first.

[Ahldagor]

Originally Posted by Nihilist_santa [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Says dude playing a 17 year old elf sim and salty as fuck about it. Still plan on being the last person on red? You are definitely on track if diabeetus doesnt slay you first.

That's some distilled weak sauce unapproved by your strong fascist desired model.

[Tecmos Deception]

Originally Posted by Trungep99 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

and a career of taking advantage of other citizens.

Sounds like he has plenty of experience with how to be a politician.

[Lune]

Originally Posted by Raev [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Even if we assume for the sake of argument that anthropogenic global warming is a 100% certainty (and I still think it's unbelievably stupid to trust a group of people who say they can simulate a chaotic system, regardless of how many PhDs they give themselves), so what?

Do you seriously think world leaders will agree to make real cuts in CO2 production when the global economy is even now melting down under a mountain of debt? And even if by some miracle emissions were slashed 25%, how much of an effect do you really think it will have?

Conclusion: if AGW is real, it's baked into the cake already regardless of what Trump, Hillary, or anyone else tries to do.

Under the current system, no, it won't be fixed as long as the baby boomers are alive and likely long after they are dead. Fixing this problem would require widespread cultural changes away from a growth/consumption driven economy and towards a more sustainable model where we aren't gobbling down resources like fucking outrageous gluttons. Those cultural changes won't occur if huge swaths of society deny various environmental problems even exist.

When people like Trump and the Republicans deny facts and evidence regarding climate science, evolution, or any other issue (under considerable influence from energy companies, religious fundamentalists, etc), those cultural changes get stalled. Huge masses of people fall into lockstep with party dogma and it gets reinforced in conservative media that serves the party establishment (just like the liberal side and immigration, social justice, political correctness).

We don't even know for sure if the effects of global warming will be net-negative, but either way I just want policy to be guided by facts and evidence. The way I see it, this desire to deny global warming and the climactic effects of industry is tied in with our obsession with growth and consumption. Nevermind that there are a lot of good reasons to oppose coal and other forms of pollution aside from global warming.