![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#2
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#3
|
|||
|
armed seizure of a government building is a tiny bit different than unarmed walking-around in a public space
just a tiny bit | ||
|
|
|||
|
#4
|
||||
|
Quote:
You heard it here first. | |||
|
|
||||
|
#5
|
|||
|
being armed in most government facilities is, yes.
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#6
|
|||
|
Not in this case.
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#7
|
|||
|
So why were they mad in the first place, and why did the FBI get involved. Can you illuminate us?
Were they just like molesting themselves and eachother illegally at first, then the FBI got called on them after someone saw them molest themselves with guns and a bible? | ||
|
|
|||
|
#8
|
|||
|
So then the Kent State massacre was justified then. Since it was government property and all, ya know? The Occupy (Occupy walltrstreat/ Occupy everything) movement started with occupying government property (in California). Buncha terrorists. And in that vid, I saw weapons, not guns but whats the difference? Shoot someone or club them to death, dead is dead.
It's about gvt stealing private land, mae.
__________________
| ||
|
Last edited by Daywolf; 02-11-2016 at 04:42 PM..
|
|
||
|
#9
|
|||
|
indeed, every single one of those outlandish strawmen, are my actual opinion!
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#10
|
|||
|
Well I'm glad we finally straightened that out [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Hey, they are only doing to the gvt what the gvt is doing tho them, but doing it w/o firing a shot. And in a building totally not in use, just to make a point. No disruptions to anyone. No riots, no property being burnt down, no one harmed... well not the cops anyway.
__________________
| ||
|
|
|||
![]() |
|
|