jet fuel does melt steel beams

[AzzarTheGod]

Originally Posted by James_Joyce [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Personally I'm of the opinion that all specific arguments about 9/11 being actuated by something other than planes are distractions from the indisputable facts that Western and Israeli intelligence dropped the ball, intentionally or not, on stopping the attack and then callously exploited the event to advance various interests that are contrary to the will of the American public.

It's like trying to prove Kennedy was shot from the grassy knoll. You're better off focusing on motive, who benefitted, and other indisputable facts than miring yourself in "I know exactly what it would look like if this unprecedented plane crash into a vast tower resulting in a collapse really happened, and it wouldn't look like this." Whether or not the argument is plausible (and I think it is fwiw), when you start to claim some kind of surety as to how the collapse should have gone down skeptical people automatically start tuning you out, and rightly so. The bias is evident.

Perfect wrap up to this thread. Pleb brains aren't ready to focus on what matters because its too frustrating. Good nights sleep is hard for them to come by when they start asking real questions.

Like every corrupt detective and FBI agent story that has come out, the supervisor in charge of the corrupt agent says the exact same thing every time: "Nobody had the stomach to look and see what he might be into."

Real shit dawg.

[indiscriminate_hater]

this may be first RnF post where bush/towers is outranked by all other options