Quote:
Originally Posted by Patriam1066
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
The people who groom my dog are an elderly couple. They run a small POS establishment, but they are good at what they do and nice as fuck. They have a crew of high school kids that play with all of the dogs in the back.
Do you think CostCo has the same overhead as Groomies? One size fit all doesn't work. If it does, why don't we just raise the federal minimum wage to $100 an hour. The numbers obviously don't matter. In addition, let's just ignore that Texas has a GDP per capita that is less than California or Maryland. Let's just let the federal government, made up of clearly competent people like Nancy Pelosi and Ted Cruz, step on the states and municipalities and manage microeconomics.
Walmart and CostCo can be forced into a minimum wage. The vast majority of businesses are small and will actually be hurt by these policies. If you want to help Wall Street to the detriment of Main Street, it's a great policy.
The mandated minimum income is a much better idea. Era'viss I think mentioned it. If y'all feel so compelled to guarantee people a minimum standard of living, then do it on the backs of banks and massive multinationals that don't really help the average American. I really don't see how fucking over the people who groom my dog and pay the high school kids who work there for $7.25 an hour accomplishes anything. Most of the kids out here are wealthy anyway. They want the job for spending money and it looks like the easiest thing in the world.
Oh. And finally, if you raise the minimum wage massively, you're going to see increased automation. I know you're smart enough to see that. Hell, no matter what the minimum wage is in the future, that will continue to happen. The minimum income replacing welfare / food stamps is better for this as well.
|
I took issue with your broad contention that "minimum wage increases don't work", and you reasoning you provided, that it just results in firings. That is a falsehood. I didn't say a blanket federally mandated minimum wage is the answer, I think the solution needs to be more complex than that, and basic income is one idea.
Again, if your business model relies on the exploitation of labor, your business should not exist in the form it does. Paying high school kids spending money is one thing, and that's clearly not what I'm talking about, and there are good ways to differentiate between that and actual subsistence labor in terms of regulations. For every elderly white dog groomer out there paying some good old wholesome white boys $7.25 an hour to play with dogs, there's a motel paying some middle aged Mexican $7.25 an hour to clean up sploogy bedding, or a Starbucks paying a struggling 20-something $7.25 an hour to make coffee. You could make the same argument for all those examples. "b-b-b-b-but I need to exploit cheap labor to get by." No, you don't.