![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
Quote:
The building fell at freefall speed within it's footprint Physics > Lies | |||
|
|
||||
|
#2
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#3
|
|||
|
Now another question. Without implying conspiracy but possibly implying government incompetence. Why were there no birds in the air in the just under eighteen minutes between tower one and tower two getting hit and then of course the Pentagon getting hit over a half hour later?
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#4
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
![]() Tanrin,Rinat,Sprucewaynee | |||
|
|
||||
|
#5
|
|||
|
6 months before 9/11 a series created by Chris Carter as a spinoff to the X-Files called the lone gunmen aired its pilot in which the govt hijacks airplanes and flies them remotely. Also see my previous post and link regarding operation North Woods. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9rsMG2hHsLo
Just because you perceive the govt to be inept does not mean that they are. There are countless secret operations performed daily. As to large scale events you realize the allies created an entire fake army to make the Germans think they were going to invade through Africa and Italy and not through France and it was kept entirely secret. Perhaps you are unaware that the atomic bomb was created entirely in secret as well. Just because you fail to believe something does not make it true. DUMB or bunkers have been kept secret for decades and require the use of many people to build. The Greenbriar Resort is one such place that was once secret. Look at area 51. There are many theories about that location however there is little proof because *duh*secrecy. So those are just a handful of examples which sink those arguments. | ||
|
|
|||
|
#6
|
|||
|
Witnesses in building 7 claim to have heard explosions inside the building. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ERhoNYj9_fg
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#7
|
|||
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yWfsOgRm-pk
Skull and Bones 322 322 = Genesis 3:22 Genesis 3:22 (KJV) - And the LORD God said, Behold, the man is become as one of us, to know good and evil: and now, lest he put forth his hand, and take also of the tree of life, and eat, and live for ever: | ||
|
|
|||
|
#8
|
|||
|
You're* - Damn the devil and his typos.
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#9
|
|||
|
Well, there you have it folks. G13 obviously has way too much invested in his conspiracy fetish to consider any kind of capitulation to solid facts and research. His enjoyment of the conspiracy is much more important to him than boring, dull facts. I guess I can't really blame him too much, it is pretty boring.
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#10
|
||||
|
Quote:
The NIST Report is propaganda. Not facts. Please show me any other tall building in history that ever collapsed within it's footprint (at freefall speed) due to fire NIST never factored in fire accelerants in their report. This is standard for all building fire investigations. More than 1000 architects and engineers disagree with NIST's claim that fires brought down building 7. That list is growing. No engineer peer reviewed the NIST report nor was the final report signed off by one. Go ahead. Read it. No engineer listed on the report was ever given all the evidence. On the contrary, the evidence was divided up between different groups of investigators/engineers who looked at individual evidence in a vacuum. Not within the context of a macro investigation as a whole. The NIST computer model did not match the actual collapse The NIST report ignored testimony from several key witnesses, such as Matthys Levy which contradicted their claims as to the actual time the fire started. This is crucial because their testimony confirms fires started in the building before the WTC collapse. Not after. NIST lied about the duration and temperatures of the fires in their report NIST has never published their modeling data. They also ignored all physical and eyewitness testimony that conflicted with their report NIST never calculated thermal conductivity in their bogus models. Steel doesn't conduct heat? They also never calculated thermal expansion of the concrete floors as well. It's called "rigging the game" to achieve the desired results = propaganda and lies NIST completely omitted sheer studs from their model. I can't tell you how critical this is and how that fact alone obliterates that bogus post you want to trumpet. In their original preliminary report they did in fact report these studs. They were omitted in the final report. This all has to do with their bogus theory regarding thermal expansion. NIST completely ignored all eyewitness reports of explosions before the building came down They had to do all this trickery to discover a "new kind of collapse" never seen before in the history of buildings All your government ever does is lie to you Wake up | |||
|
|
||||
![]() |
|
|