Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > General Community > Rants and Flames

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-24-2014, 08:35 PM
Eponymous Anonymous Eponymous Anonymous is offline
Decaying Skeleton


Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 2
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lisset [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
The precedent is what Sirken said multiple times in that thread and that is that the ONLY time to kill a raid mob is when YOU have FTE. He also said specifically that FTE should have been allowed to reset.

The situation is actually quite similar. 2 guilds got on the FTE list and the guild that got FTE had their person die and the guild that also was on the list killed the dragon without their own FTE. That was the essence of that whole thread. IB decided that TMO's FTE didn't count and killed the mob. Taken decided that AG's FTE didn't count and killed the mob. That's very similar. You have 2 guilds both getting on the agro list without FTE. you have 2 guilds deciding on their own that the FTE didn't count and killing the mob.

Bottom line is that Taken should get a week off. Sirken specifically warned everyone in the raid discussion forum.
Then so should IB, BDA, TMO, Omni and Divinity as they ALL had people on the hate list, not allowing the mob to reset.

http://www.project1999.com/forums/sh...28&postcount=7
  #2  
Old 08-24-2014, 08:36 PM
Dizey Dizey is offline
Orc


Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 34
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eponymous Anonymous [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Ok having read that thread, the obvious difference from this situation is:

On Faydedar, the FTE was rightfully TMO's, who were not disqualified from killing it at that point, and went on to be KSed by IB.

With Sev, AG got an accidental FTE with their tracker, who was then disqualified and thus had to concede the encounter, and so there was no rightful FTE in this case. The situations are vastly different and I don't see the first setting a precedent for the second.

I will agree that everyone on the hate list at that point should have wiped their agro and let Sev reset. Was the pull and kill by Taken rightful without an FTE shout in this case? Probably not, but i'm willing to bet that Taken was not the only guild still on the hate list when Sev was pulled to TT zone.
The rule is as simple as it gets. No FTE message for your guild, not your guild's to kill. What's so hard to understand there?
  #3  
Old 08-24-2014, 08:40 PM
Eponymous Anonymous Eponymous Anonymous is offline
Decaying Skeleton


Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 2
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dizey [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
The rule is as simple as it gets. No FTE message for your guild, not your guild's to kill. What's so hard to understand there?
Do you read? I stated I agree with that.
  #4  
Old 08-24-2014, 07:46 PM
Herp Herp is offline
Aviak

Herp's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 68
Default

Even if everybody on agro list didn't zone/die/hat out in a timely manner like they should have, it gave them absolutely zero right to pull and kill the dragon without FTE.

What am I missing here?
  #5  
Old 08-24-2014, 07:47 PM
Freakish Freakish is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,273
Default

That you're not Taken. Get back in your hole pleb.
__________________
Butchh | Facetious | Knockers
Jayce | Briefs | Squash
  #6  
Old 08-24-2014, 07:55 PM
Lisset Lisset is offline
Banned


Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 295
Default

In the above mentioned Faydedar thread, Sirken said:
Quote:
you can make whatever argument you like, at the end of the day, you didn't have FTE, and after that person died, there was never a new FTE message given.

you had absolutely zero reason to think the mob was yours.

next time it happens you will get a week break from raiding. one of the most important things in the raid scene is to respect each others FTE messages.
So how many more "next times" will there be Sirken? Or is every guild entitled to a "next time" too?
  #7  
Old 08-24-2014, 08:43 PM
Tasslehofp99 Tasslehofp99 is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 2,314
Default

lol nm derp im blind, saw them on the 2nd glance
__________________
-Aftermath-
Tasslehof - 60 Druid
Barlow - 60 monk
Blueberrii - 60 Mage
Gigglepurr - 60 Shaman
Kids - 60 Rogue
Fornfamnad - 60 Cleric
  #8  
Old 08-24-2014, 08:52 PM
Swish Swish is offline
Planar Protector

Swish's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 20,058
Default

This thread had so much potential [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
__________________
  #9  
Old 08-24-2014, 09:00 PM
khanable khanable is offline
Planar Protector

khanable's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: The Plane of Rustles
Posts: 2,709
Default

Here ya go nerds

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W4zz...ature=youtu.be
__________________
hello i'm cucumbers
  #10  
Old 08-24-2014, 09:04 PM
Freakish Freakish is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,273
Default

Your bard just buffed the mage who cothed you, which had aggro on Sev. You can see the pet taunting in the video! Like, I get why you'd coth him first but he's just continuing the engage if he buffs you with Selo's.

So we confirm this is BDAs fault and not Taken. Free Taken. Taken did nothing wrong.
__________________
Butchh | Facetious | Knockers
Jayce | Briefs | Squash
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:45 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.