tell me what you really think

[Wildino]

Originally Posted by Atalya [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Seriously be french and just quit ...

With that i really know what you are, a colosal douchebag

[Susvain2]

omg tiggles accent is the best. listening to that twitch now

[LulzSect]

red needs a wipe im tired of this faggot beta neckbeard box

wipe

enable blue xp

xp loss on pvp death

item loot

fuck this faggot central faggot box full of neckbeardian faggot kings

[LulzSect]

being a froglok was a faggot experience

didnt have the heart to unclick it

feels

[LulzSect]

you did give me back the name Lulz after some faggot reserved it on a level one (because i went out friday night with a big tittied whore and fucked her intensely over the course of the weekend server opening) and didn't log into the account ever again

[|3igHurb]

ur a bad man who hates dicks

[katrik]

*TESTING*

Fuck you Sirken, you're a minority and I just dont plain like you..!!!*

Gosh Darn it..!

Naw I have no problems with you Sir Ken.

<3

[Loke]

Ok, since I read 5-6 pages in and saw nothing but people collectively stroking off Sirken, I'll actually chime in with something critical.

As Rogean and Nilbog have gotten less and less hand on in terms of enforcing rules and passing judgement on infractions, Sirken has become the de facto senior official who deals with player complaints. Sirken is also a former member of TMO, a guild central to many of those complaints. Sirken's play character was also banned in the SEQ purge.

Essentially I see Sirken being a GM as no different than someone like myself of Jeremy being made GMs, which I'm sure people would be up in arms about. Hell, let's get Modus and Abacab back here to run the show while we're at it.

We've got a box where the identities of GMs is kept secret from the player base, and simply questioning the GMs can result in punitive action. However, those same GMs who we're expected to hold above reproach have also included people like Amelinda who we very blatantly corrupt. Or Cyrius who very blatantly favored certain guilds. Their rackets were able to continue for months because anyone who was even remotely critical of them was punished. There seems to be zero oversight, especially for someone at Sirken's level.

When information like this has been posted in the past it has been deleted and the players who posted it banned.

As far as I'm concerned, the only person on this box who seems to be consistently fair is Nilbog, and that is because he doesn't get involved in all the player drama. Its too bad he doesn't care enough to be bothered with player questions/concerns anymore, because the people he's entrusted with the keys to the castle in the past few years have been suspect at best.

All that said, this is without a doubt the best box out there and even with the shady history of GMs I'd rather play here than any where else. I just think it is ridiculous that someone with a history not so different than my own is basically judge, jury and executioner with minimal, if any oversight.

[Bree Olson]

Originally Posted by Loke [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

When information like this has been posted in the past it has been deleted and the players who posted it banned.

Yea, can I get my 2009 forum account unbanned? Sorry I told everyone you gave TMO spawn times in the past.

[Grimfan]

Originally Posted by Loke [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Ok, since I read 5-6 pages in and saw nothing but people collectively stroking off Sirken, I'll actually chime in with something critical.

As Rogean and Nilbog have gotten less and less hand on in terms of enforcing rules and passing judgement on infractions, Sirken has become the de facto senior official who deals with player complaints. Sirken is also a former member of TMO, a guild central to many of those complaints. Sirken's play character was also banned in the SEQ purge.

Essentially I see Sirken being a GM as no different than someone like myself of Jeremy being made GMs, which I'm sure people would be up in arms about. Hell, let's get Modus and Abacab back here to run the show while we're at it.

We've got a box where the identities of GMs is kept secret from the player base, and simply questioning the GMs can result in punitive action. However, those same GMs who we're expected to hold above reproach have also included people like Amelinda who we very blatantly corrupt. Or Cyrius who very blatantly favored certain guilds. Their rackets were able to continue for months because anyone who was even remotely critical of them was punished. There seems to be zero oversight, especially for someone at Sirken's level.

When information like this has been posted in the past it has been deleted and the players who posted it banned.

As far as I'm concerned, the only person on this box who seems to be consistently fair is Nilbog, and that is because he doesn't get involved in all the player drama. Its too bad he doesn't care enough to be bothered with player questions/concerns anymore, because the people he's entrusted with the keys to the castle in the past few years have been suspect at best.

All that said, this is without a doubt the best box out there and even with the shady history of GMs I'd rather play here than any where else. I just think it is ridiculous that someone with a history not so different than my own is basically judge, jury and executioner with minimal, if any oversight.

Ah, makes a lot more sense why a nobody like me with a ton of free time every week and a lot of experience as a CSR gets looked over when applying to guide then. I guess if you're a nobody to them then it doesn't really matter how qualified you are to help out.