Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > General Community > Rants and Flames

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #51  
Old 05-25-2014, 12:56 PM
HeallunRumblebelly HeallunRumblebelly is offline
Planar Protector

HeallunRumblebelly's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Roanoke, Indiana
Posts: 1,353
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Writ3r [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Lucky i'm not a GM you'd be suspended or banned for scripting being a scumbag and ignoring the intention behind the PnP.

2 months ago by your own admission you had your lack of guild tag resolved only to de-tag to cause future confusion and only re-tagging after you get FTE to try and induce chaos.
scripting? are we just making up words now? He posted logs <_<
  #52  
Old 05-25-2014, 01:01 PM
Portsche Portsche is offline
Planar Protector

Portsche's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Autobahn
Posts: 1,654
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hitpoint [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
It's actually fucking hard to get guild invites in TD. I have two chars that I use for Fay there, and neither are tagged tmo right now. Officer alts that they bring to fay aren't always tagged as officers.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mezzmur [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
[Sat May 24 22:31:44 2014] Lookin is an officer of The Mystical Order.
[Sat May 24 22:31:50 2014] You told lookin, 'Inivte *Flippie)'
...
[Sat May 24 22:33:00 2014] You have joined The Mystical Order.
[Sat May 24 22:33:00 2014] You are now a regular member of the guild.
One down, 2+ to go. Start Lookin for me in TD.
__________________
Quote:
Originally posted by Autotune: portsche gives 0fucks.

Originally posted by Harrison: I repeat, what kind of pathetic pussy is too afraid to post on the forums under their character's name?
  #53  
Old 05-25-2014, 01:04 PM
Socratic Socratic is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 264
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HeallunRumblebelly [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
But the real question is, under current raid rules, how does that work exactly? Is it still possible?
It seems obvious to me that anyone you paid to FTE for you would eat one of your 2 allowed FTE slots, and any extra people at the spawn would result in some sort of raid suspension for trying to get around the rules.

Unless of course you are IB. Then they would just tell you not to do it again.
  #54  
Old 05-25-2014, 01:18 PM
HeallunRumblebelly HeallunRumblebelly is offline
Planar Protector

HeallunRumblebelly's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Roanoke, Indiana
Posts: 1,353
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Socratic [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
It seems obvious to me that anyone you paid to FTE for you would eat one of your 2 allowed FTE slots, and any extra people at the spawn would result in some sort of raid suspension for trying to get around the rules.

Unless of course you are IB. Then they would just tell you not to do it again.
That's what I thought as well. The first part--they count as one of your FTE'rs and would be ineligible to transfer fte. But from a purely theoretical perspective, if tmo were to split into two guilds but raid together, would we be allowed 4 fte'rs? Does this then prevent guilds from assisting on each other's targets? I remember when fe / ib were a thing we were also restricted to 2 fte'rs, which would then only make sense that you would be unable to even assist other guilds as they make their attempt.
  #55  
Old 05-25-2014, 01:25 PM
SamwiseRed SamwiseRed is offline
Planar Protector

SamwiseRed's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Tatooine
Posts: 10,186
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HeallunRumblebelly [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
That's what I thought as well. The first part--they count as one of your FTE'rs and would be ineligible to transfer fte. But from a purely theoretical perspective, if tmo were to split into two guilds but raid together, would we be allowed 4 fte'rs? Does this then prevent guilds from assisting on each other's targets? I remember when fe / ib were a thing we were also restricted to 2 fte'rs, which would then only make sense that you would be unable to even assist other guilds as they make their attempt.
blue needs jesus
__________________
Current Games:
Naw
  #56  
Old 05-25-2014, 01:29 PM
HeallunRumblebelly HeallunRumblebelly is offline
Planar Protector

HeallunRumblebelly's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Roanoke, Indiana
Posts: 1,353
Default

Raid discussion thread on fay locked. Ended on this note:

as i told Hokushin, if they have more than two reps, let us know and i'll smash their face. but they were following the rules, so you guys had absolutely zero right to just skip over the rules simply because you couldnt figure out what was happening.

everyone read this carefully, EVEN IF Golden was a legit unguilded scrub, if he has FTE, thats his dragon. and EVEN THEN you are not allowed to KS the mob.


there is no universe that exists where u can paint a picture of what happened at Fay and walk away being right. you guys are 110% in the wrong.
__________________

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
  #57  
Old 05-25-2014, 01:38 PM
Ambrotos Ambrotos is offline
VIP / Contributor

Ambrotos's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,290
Default

It's always been clear that FTE message is king. There has been no question about it. So many rulings before the formal raid rules were put out about it should have made it clear. Pretending otherwise is trying to game the system.
__________________
  #58  
Old 05-25-2014, 01:41 PM
HeallunRumblebelly HeallunRumblebelly is offline
Planar Protector

HeallunRumblebelly's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Roanoke, Indiana
Posts: 1,353
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ambrotos [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
It's always been clear that FTE message is king. There has been no question about it. So many rulings before the formal raid rules were put out about it should have made it clear. Pretending otherwise is trying to game the system.
And what does precedent say about disregarding FTE (post yellow text), killing the mob, looting the mob, and then attempting to argue such an obvious error to the GMs?
  #59  
Old 05-25-2014, 01:59 PM
Mezzmur Mezzmur is offline
Fire Giant

Mezzmur's Avatar

Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 507
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HeallunRumblebelly [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
And what does precedent say about disregarding FTE (post yellow text), killing the mob, looting the mob, and then attempting to argue such an obvious error to the GMs?
IMHO, All the loot belongs to me and me alone. Fuck TMO.
__________________
Bamek Blazingbeard
  #60  
Old 05-25-2014, 02:01 PM
MaksimMazor MaksimMazor is offline
Fire Giant

MaksimMazor's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Memphis
Posts: 731
Default

I like the "110%" part
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:27 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.