Naw, Give Red Features not Blue with PvP Enabled - Page 6

Faerie · #1 04-15-2014, 12:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aenor [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Was 5 levels too much to ask? Rallos Zek proved that if you don't like PvP, level for a few hours and you will be out of range of the person attacking you. The blue server is already available at log in. Why do we need two?

Why is 4 unacceptable when 5 isn't? It's already 4 from 1-20 and people seem okay with it there. If the server looks blue from an outside perspective it will bring in more players, and that would (hopefully) result in a net gain of pvp just from the added population. 4 doesn't really seem that bad to me, especially at the high end where levels are capped.

Aenor · #2 04-15-2014, 02:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Faerie [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Why is 4 unacceptable when 5 isn't? It's already 4 from 1-20 and people seem okay with it there. If the server looks blue from an outside perspective it will bring in more players, and that would (hopefully) result in a net gain of pvp just from the added population. 4 doesn't really seem that bad to me, especially at the high end where levels are capped.

4 is Rallos, which is pussy pvp. 5 would at least distinguish it from that. 6 would be better but 5 would at least not equate this server with Rallos, the biggest joke in the history of MMO PvP.

Stasis04 · #3 04-14-2014, 11:59 PM

Stasis04 · #4 04-15-2014, 12:01 AM

If we're going for FFA 8 is way too much. It worked because of the teams aspect on TZ.

Aenor · #5 04-15-2014, 12:03 AM

Ok fine, people can't handle 8 levels. I agree that you can't be competitive against someone who is 8 levels higher. But how about 6 levels? 5 levels? There is a middle ground between too wide and too narrow. Why do we have to go from one extreme to the other?