Science Admits They Made Up Everything About the Big Bang

[r00t]

also I didn make that einstein picture I just searched for a vindication.jpg nad it popped up. Who gives a fuck if he failed at math or not? Hawkings was wrong on a lot of stuff not just the big bang, a brief history of time is worthless fiction at this point. Less historical fact than the good book.

[r00t]

Originally Posted by DrKvothe [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Scientists backpedal all the time

[Langrisserx]

yea... no, yea see... no, yea, no

[runlvlzero]

you got r00t to quad post, good job

[runlvlzero]

i can't count anymore =/ triple post...

[Shaakglith12194]

Originally Posted by r00t [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

also I didn make that einstein picture I just searched for a vindication.jpg nad it popped up. Who gives a fuck if he failed at math or not? Hawkings was wrong on a lot of stuff not just the big bang, a brief history of time is worthless fiction at this point. Less historical fact than the good book.

The person whose name you keep misspelling is H A W K I N G, Stephen Hawking. Not H A W K I N G S. God, you are dumb. Also, he has come out and publicly said that he doesn't think there will ever be a grand unified theory. The thing about science is that theories about how the universe works are constantly evolving as our understanding does. But please, enlighten us on how the bible is so historically accurate.

[r00t]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historicity_of_Jesus

[Orruar]

The only way in which religion incorporates new ideas into their worldview is this:

-> story from the bible accepted at face value
-> new evidence/ideas come along to dispute this
-> religious people fight tooth and nail to avoid the new ideas
-> overwhelming support for new ideas makes believing the original story embarrassing
-> religious people now claim old story was just an analogy, not based on actual fact

Noah, 7 day creation, tower of babel, etc. etc. etc.

[Orruar]

Originally Posted by Sadre Spinegnawer [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

"Where did the universe come from?" is not a scientific question. Just like "What happens after the universe?" is.

There never will be a scientific theory of why any of this exists. Just theories on how it exists given that it exists. But its existence is a given beyond which we have no information.
...

I'm glad you know the exact limits of our knowledge. I bet there was an ancient Greek version of you that said we'd never know why the stars are in the sky. We still are fairly infantile in our understanding of our universe. Hell, we haven't managed to get a human farther than 0.0000000000000000000003125% of the way to the edge of the observable universe. Making claims about the limits of our knowledge seems somewhat premature.

[Langrisserx]

"Goldilocks zones are regions around stars that are 'just right' for liquid water and for the chemistry of life as we know it. Now one cosmologist points out that the universe must have been through a Goldilocks epoch, a period in which warm, watery conditions could have existed on almost any planet in the entire cosmos. The key phenomenon here is the cosmic background radiation, the afterglow of the Big Bang which was blazing hot when it first formed. But as the universe expanded, the wavelength of this radiation increased, lowering its energy. Today, it is an icy 3 Kelvin. But somewhere along the way, it must have been between 273 and 300 Kelvin, just right to keep water in liquid form. According to the new calculations, this Goldilocks epoch would have occurred when the universe was about 15 million years old and would have lasted for several million years. And since the first stars had a lifespan of only 3 million years or so, that allows plenty of time for the heavy elements to have formed which are necessary for planet formation and the chemistry of life. Indeed, if live did evolve a this time, it would have predated life on Earth by about 10 billion years."

https://medium.com/p/239bc4cf4ece