![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#2
|
|||
|
Rangers can dish out pretty respectable DPS, track better than anyone in the game, root park adds like a champ, single pull outdoors, DS, and snare runners. Flame lick is an extremely OP snap aggro spell, and even untwinked Rangers can tank group content pretty well if you have a slower.
The problem is the vast majority of players in-game want specialists: specialist tanks and specialist DPS classes. Not generalists with moderate DPS. Add to that the hybrid penalty stigma, and the fact that at any given time there's a million and a half Monks asking to fill a group's last DPS slot, and you have a shitload of permanently LFG Rangers.
__________________
Stinkum's Greatest Hits:
In Defense of the Paladin In Memory of Cros Treewind The Top 4 Most Depressing Facts about the Titanium Client | ||
|
Last edited by Stinkum; 10-17-2013 at 01:42 PM..
|
|
||
|
#4
|
|||
|
You're the one who's high on something. Rangers can cheaply get a weapon with a better damage than almost any war combo and toss out an additional 10 dps sustained with CoF. More with Calefaction 59+.
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#5
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#6
|
|||
|
The hell are you talking about, web?
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#7
|
|||
|
I often don't know what the hell web is talking about.
__________________
Stinkum's Greatest Hits:
In Defense of the Paladin In Memory of Cros Treewind The Top 4 Most Depressing Facts about the Titanium Client | ||
|
|
|||
|
#10
|
|||
|
Web, you're right about the lack of desire for rangers in groups, but you are very wrong about ranger dps and a few other issues. As are, it seems, most people.
__________________
The Ancient Ranger
Awake again. | ||
|
|
|||
![]() |
|
|