Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Blue Community > Blue Server Chat

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-15-2013, 10:05 AM
webrunner5 webrunner5 is offline
Planar Protector

webrunner5's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Oxford, Ohio
Posts: 4,094
Default

A Warrior with a Fungi and a good haste item, few good agro weapons, is a LOT of fun. And with that setup they are good pullers also. And EVERY group kills for one. Can't go wrong with beating on things.

I know monks are awesome but there is a million of them. Rogue is killer also but sniffing butts your hole career, get it hole, sucks, get it. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] Go Warrior or stay home.
  #2  
Old 06-15-2013, 06:41 PM
Splorf22 Splorf22 is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,237
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bubbles [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
everquest wisdom
As the proud owner of an Iksar Warrior I have to agree with this. I tried a monk afterwards and I was like a teenage girl "omg so much easier!". If you have gotten used to FD/mend/sneak saving your ass and allowing you to split stuff at will you will cry with a warrior. Where warriors come into their own is L60 when they finally get great aggro weapons and discs and are far and away the best MT option. Sakuragi (even with his iksarness) has been The A-Team's main (and pretty much only) tank since our inception and has allowed us to do way more than we would have if I had gone monk.

I also agree with the Bard recommendation. At low levels with a fungi tunic you can just sing chant of battle with a lute and kill like 7 orcs at once in crushbone [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] I also tried soloing: at 40ish Dramor could solo kobolds in Sol B pretty well (although there are a few tricks to it), by 45 i could duo the royals. At 48 I can still do BNB with some patience and charming but the fungi is finally starting to run out a bit and the low HP of the bard is showing. I feel like bards are actually much more fragile than enchanters - no rune and no stun/ae mez really sucks when you fuck up. But certainly 1-50 Bards are one of the few melee classes that exceed Monk in utility.
__________________
Raev | Loraen | Sakuragi <The A-Team> | Solo Artist Challenge | Farmer's Market
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arteker
in words of anal fingers, just a filthy spaniard
  #3  
Old 06-15-2013, 11:01 AM
Fazlazen Fazlazen is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 839
Default

go with a sk and get him his epic at lvl 1.
  #4  
Old 06-16-2013, 12:53 AM
Handull Handull is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 1,255
Default

a warrior twink will be similar to a monk, except your ability to solo well will stop sooner than with a monk. the same goes for a rogue.

ranger twinks can be fun, and they have some utility that is unique as compared to war/rogue/monk. i'm still soloing my ranger twink and nearly level 45.

bards aren't very gear dependent, so aside from having high end instruments and a fungi, I don't see a twink bard needing much.

wiz/mage dont need much gear at all, so thats out.

enc/necro could be fun, but both also dont need much gear early on, and necros i dont think really ever need much gear.

shaman could be fun with the right gear

cleric would be great if you can pick up a manastone (and a donals bp) haha

not sure about sk or paly, but an sk twink would probably be legit, just never got into that class myself.
  #5  
Old 06-16-2013, 01:06 AM
t0lkien t0lkien is offline
Fire Giant

t0lkien's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 606
Default

I don't know why you would put a fungi on a Bard, it's just not necessary. If you're getting hit you're not doing it right, and you have a heal song that you twist in if you do. Spend the 70k+ on your epic IMO.
__________________
  #6  
Old 06-16-2013, 04:45 AM
webrunner5 webrunner5 is offline
Planar Protector

webrunner5's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Oxford, Ohio
Posts: 4,094
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by t0lkien [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I don't know why you would put a fungi on a Bard, it's just not necessary. If you're getting hit you're not doing it right, and you have a heal song that you twist in if you do. Spend the 70k+ on your epic IMO.
There is like 7 epic Bards in the whole game lol. 70k, yeah right. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] 3 more than Druid's with epic.
  #7  
Old 06-16-2013, 04:53 AM
Wudan Wudan is offline
Sarnak

Wudan's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 361
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by t0lkien [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I don't know why you would put a fungi on a Bard, it's just not necessary. If you're getting hit you're not doing it right, and you have a heal song that you twist in if you do. Spend the 70k+ on your epic IMO.


Fungi is great for bard, its not like they should solo 1-60 doing aoe and even if they do, they will get hit if solo kite - you know, its part of learning te class. Not everyone is such a pro as yourself to never get hit once.....on the other hand... bard epic is 500k so your post makes me think you have no idea what you are talking about anyway.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:45 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.