Women's Rights

[Byrjun]

Originally Posted by Mortiiss [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

My point is that, currently, there is a double standard. Are you trying to say there isn't? If so, please elaborate. Thank you!

I'm sorry but there isn't some secret council of women who come up with ways to make men miserable and then impose those "double standards" on the world.

There's a reason that certain social norms are the social norms and others aren't. Most women don't want their junk fondled. Most men couldn't really care less, especially if the woman is attractive. Women are biologically weaker than men. Neither should hit the other but yes, it's a bigger deal when a man beats up a woman as opposed to the other way around. I'm curious about your upbringing if you think that a man beating a woman up and a woman beating the man up are completely similar situations.

It also works the same way too, like that hot ass teacher who recently got some insane punishment for sleeping with a 16 or whatever year old boy. Guess what, he wasn't irreparably damaged, and most guys would consider him lucky as hell. But the woman is behind bars because there needs to be "equality."

[feanan]

Alawen, white knight of minorities and women everwhere.

I feel so guilty and dirty for being a white male now.

[Alawen]

Originally Posted by feanan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Alawen, white knight of minorities and women everwhere.

I feel so guilty and dirty for being a white male now.

Another in a long series of false dichotomies. Perhaps you could consider, just for a moment, that there is a position somewhere in between the white male pity party and the all white males are devils who should die party. The premise of this thread is that women have a superior place in society. I dispute that premise. That is my position.

[Mortiiss]

Originally Posted by Alawen [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

There are double standards about many things. Women and other minorities continue to be under-represented in executive positions both public and private. If you think women have greater advantages in life than men, why doesn't it show in their job titles or incomes? The 113th Congress has 20 female senators--more than ever before in history. Less than 5% of Fortune 500 CEOs are women.

But that must be because white men are genetically superior to everyone else and so they deserve to be king or god or whatever. Poor, poor you. You should have been a prince with a bunch of concubines. You were cheated, cheated I say!

You assume way too much stuff when you argue. Please give me the quote where I said women have greater advantages in life than men. Please do so.

Additionally, thanks again for the personal insults. Every time you do that you look like a moron - so thank you for that, saves me the trouble.

[Mortiiss]

Originally Posted by Daldolma [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

this thread is ridiculous

That's what I was going for. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Rekrul]

Originally Posted by Alawen [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Another in a long series of false dichotomies. Perhaps you could consider, just for a moment, that there is a position somewhere in between the white male pity party and the all white males are devils who should die party. The premise of this thread is that women have a superior place in society. I dispute that premise. That is my position.

The premise of this thread is that there is a double standard in certain situations involving women, that has been spelled out multiple times by the op. You just want to say what you want to say, because it seems you're highly opinionated on the topic you brought up. You really seems more angry than anything, though.

[Mortiiss]

Originally Posted by Byrjun [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I'm sorry but there isn't some secret council of women who come up with ways to make men miserable and then impose those "double standards" on the world.

There's a reason that certain social norms are the social norms and others aren't. Most women don't want their junk fondled. Most men couldn't really care less, especially if the woman is attractive. Women are biologically weaker than men. Neither should hit the other but yes, it's a bigger deal when a man beats up a woman as opposed to the other way around. I'm curious about your upbringing if you think that a man beating a woman up and a woman beating the man up are completely similar situations.

It also works the same way too, like that hot ass teacher who recently got some insane punishment for sleeping with a 16 or whatever year old boy. Guess what, he wasn't irreparably damaged, and most guys would consider him lucky as hell. But the woman is behind bars because there needs to be "equality."

Please point out where I said there is a secret society of women making things be this way. People on these forums assume so much stuff when they argue - try to use logic a bit more and approach things from a literal standpoint. I know this is why things are the way they are and I wouldn't argue it for a second, so good job Captain Obvious!

Where did I say its okay for a man to beat up a woman? So you're saying its cool for women to hit men, but not men hit women? I think no one should hit each other, man or woman - kinda sad you think its okay for women to hit men. To me that's the dictionary definition of being biased, is it not?

So you think its okay for a 16 year old to sleep with his teacher because he's a guy and she's a girl and having anything happen to her is bad? I'm not sure I'm reading that right, but if I am - what if it was a 16 year old girl having sex with her male teacher, that's a problem?

You seem to enjoy double standards, just reading your post. I mean, am I wrong? I'd like to see how if so.

[Mortiiss]

Originally Posted by Rekrul [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The premise of this thread is that there is a double standard in certain situations involving women, that has been spelled out multiple times by the op. You just want to say what you want to say, because it seems you're highly opinionated on the topic you brought up. You really seems more angry than anything, though.

Thank you, Rekrul! At least some people here employ logic and not emotions and assumptions.

[Mortiiss]

Originally Posted by Splorf22 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

In any case you are attacking a statement that I did not make: that white people are genetically superior. My point was only that redistributive policies are economically inferior.

He does that a lot.

[Tippett]

The fact there is a double standard for womens behavior in relation to men doesn't bother me much.

O yeah and being white is cool i like it