Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Blue Community > Blue Server Chat

View Poll Results: Should AAs be implemented in late Velious?
Yes! 105 47.30%
No, they should be implemented sooner 13 5.86%
No, they should not be implemented 79 35.59%
I love lamp 25 11.26%
Voters: 222. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #51  
Old 03-02-2013, 10:36 AM
webrunner5 webrunner5 is offline
Planar Protector

webrunner5's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Oxford, Ohio
Posts: 4,094
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crazrum [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
When I fill my exp bar at 60, I want to be DONE with exp.
Yeah, but then what do you do?? Live in Seb or HS?
  #52  
Old 03-02-2013, 01:05 PM
Shadin Shadin is offline
Scrawny Gnoll


Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 29
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crazrum [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
When I fill my exp bar at 60, I want to be DONE with exp.
This. No more grinding, please. Though if they limited it to the first tier of AA (run speed, attributes, etc) then I suppose it wouldn't be too horrendous. It would also prevent the need to tune content to match. However, best to just leave them out entirely.
  #53  
Old 03-02-2013, 02:12 PM
Norathorr Norathorr is offline
Kobold


Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: London
Posts: 152
Default

AA's would totally gimp velious content. Vel was a very well tuned expansion, where all content was relevant to the levels it was aimed at. Even AoW would be made trivial with aa. Unless custom content is added (perhaps pop zones with new material to create extra ultra tough planar raids and single group content) aas would simply ruin the balance.
Last edited by Norathorr; 03-02-2013 at 02:15 PM..
  #54  
Old 03-04-2013, 09:16 AM
EchoedTruth EchoedTruth is offline
Sarnak

EchoedTruth's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 322
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Norathorr [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
AA's would totally gimp velious content. Vel was a very well tuned expansion, where all content was relevant to the levels it was aimed at. Even AoW would be made trivial with aa. Unless custom content is added (perhaps pop zones with new material to create extra ultra tough planar raids and single group content) aas would simply ruin the balance.
I think they could release maybe the initial AAs (run speed, etc); and possibly later on add certain AAs, (or add all of them). The way I see it is: Velious content was already tough (I don't think anyone killed AoW till Luclin IIRC)... and it will extend long term playability for those at level 60 by a great deal.
  #55  
Old 03-04-2013, 09:22 AM
Chippy Chippy is offline
Banned


Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 301
Default

Don't ruin the best expansion to ever happen to EQ, just be happy your getting another legitimate chance to relive the old years. If you desire AA's there are plenty of other servers on eqemu that offer them.
  #56  
Old 03-04-2013, 10:03 AM
porigromus porigromus is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 225
Default

Adding additional content after Velious or customizing EQ classic will result in what all other EQEmu servers are ... dead and barren. People play here because it strives to be authentic and classic. People have been begging for a classic trilogy server for years. It would be ashame to ruin it because people want to advance their characters further.

New people will continue to play and long time players will rerole or quit. Look at EQMac, been going for years yet it is one of the more popular EQ live servers AND it doesn't change.

If they do decide to customize, I would hope it is in their own way and very suttle in line with the classic feel of the game. Tweak classes a little etc. Warriors could stand to have hate produced with bash/slam or something. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I would prefer for them to add a new server when they start customizing this one starting back at EQ original and follow thet timeline again. This time, most all bugs and nonclassic errors will be not there. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
  #57  
Old 03-04-2013, 12:43 PM
Biaxil Biaxil is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 226
Default

No aa's. This is supposed to be a "classic" server. This is why I play on red, bluebies get bored too easily and then want to start changing things.

/thread
  #58  
Old 03-04-2013, 12:52 PM
porigromus porigromus is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 225
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Biaxil [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
No aa's. This is supposed to be a "classic" server. This is why I play on red, bluebies get bored too easily and then want to start changing things.

/thread
Is not the current red server customized for pvp? I too would play on a pvp server if it wasn't altered and replicated one of the other rule sets from live such as racial teams or level ranges that can attack each other.
  #59  
Old 03-04-2013, 04:30 PM
Droog007 Droog007 is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 512
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kekephee [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
... But damn do I miss chat channels.
And the guild window... And the raid window...

Classic EQ is a great game, but the UI is just painful at times.

Please add power steering to my vintage hotrod. kthx. (this is not sarcasm)
  #60  
Old 03-04-2013, 05:17 PM
EchoedTruth EchoedTruth is offline
Sarnak

EchoedTruth's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 322
Default

Surprising - looks like a clear majority favor implementing AAs... some want it before late-Velious too!

Glad we have healthy discussion on this topic, 7 pages without flames = amazing.

Edit: a clear minority also do in fact, love lamp.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:31 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.