![]() |
|
#571
|
||||
|
Quote:
That he was found flushing documents down the toilet. Asking his lawyers to pluck the documents out of existence. This isn't the first time. There is a pattern with Trump. The Hush Money Case Trump fraudulent fundraising foundation Jane Rosenberg Case And we are still waiting on The Georgia Election Interference Investigation where he was Also on tape. There is more but it isn't worth going further into. Karma catching up with everyone there isn't any bias. And horrendous scandals on the GOP side are not uncommon looking back at Nixon, Bush and now Trump. | |||
|
|
||||
|
#572
|
|||
|
Simple question.
Does tRump have a gun, you beaut harvard trained defense team, begging to represent him? I mean surely defending an obviously innocent former president would be cream and a strawberry on top for a law firms reputation. I hate it when people waste cream. | ||
|
|
|||
|
#574
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#575
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
go go go
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#576
|
|||
|
But let's be rational.
The thing that gets me about this particular Trump case is it got brought in Florida. Basic federal law gives states the right to request a "full standard" evidence review if the Federal government brings a case in their state, using evidence relevant to that state's laws and values. The "Due Exchange Act" is basic. Even Hochul, a lifelong Dem, ordered a "full standard" in Trump's NY trial. So why didn't Florida request one? Oh that's right. Trump's *direct competitor* is the current governor. Trump is being taken down by his own party, you rubes. This case involves DC law and statutes. DC Grand Jury. Why did it suddenly and conveniently get moved to Florida? Biden licks his chops at facing Trump. But DeSantis is "the real deal." DeSantis is sharp as a whip and will slice Biden apart, and Biden knows it. That's why something is off with this situation.
__________________
go go go
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#577
|
|||
|
No takers on the tRump lawyer situation?
Since we all love a good reverse engineering exercise, I thought you guys would be all over that simple question. Is it. Innocent man, with no proof of malfeasance that should be a free shot for any firm. Lawyers tripping over each other. Or. Guilty man, with some/enough evidence who refuses to shut his damn fat mouth when advised to by previous gun you beaut lawyers who then will try using the old "my new lawyers will need time to get across my case your honor" delaying technique. Go. | ||
|
|
|||
|
#579
|
||||
|
Quote:
But I also think you did it on purpose. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] | |||
|
|
||||
![]() |
|
|