5-4 incoming?

[Jibartik]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

And here is the issue. You actually have no evidence to suggest a clump of cells growing in a human female's uterus isn't a person. That is your pseudo-science opinion.

Im so sick and tired of saying that clump of cells DNA is exactly the same as it would be if they were online saying it wasn't while wearing a polar bear hat.

Just like that guy who got hit by a buss and has no arms legs and face, should we kill him even though he says he wants to live?

Is it SAYING that makes him difference? Cant be, cus toddlers cant say.

Is it that someone in a coma has memories of a past where he was able to enjoy life that makes him ineligible for destruction?

There is just no consistency in the liberal argument, and therefore it makes no sense.

We cant be making laws off of shit that does not make sense, THAT IS WHAT CHURCH IS FOR.

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by robayon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

And the same thing Americans who support the military do when American bombs incinerate innocents

Or when foreign workers get murdered by thugs for daring to try to seize better working conditions

Or when pro-police people justify the police murdering someone out of open racism, you saw a lot of that in the wake of George Floyd especially, people saying "well he was just a drug addict" as if that washes their hands of the murderers they support

Again, Military actions are different from abortions. You cannot compare everything that has death as a possible result logically.

Otherwise abortions and disease are the same thing, as both involve death.

[Jibartik]

If you want to argue that abortion should be legal. At least say, under us code we do not give fetus's rights until they are first removed from the mother.

Just say that's what you DECIDE.

But dont say it's because of science because it is not. Say it's because you chose to make the law that way.

That's all I ask.

[Elizondo]

Originally Posted by loramin [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Killing someone is the definition of messing with someone else's body. You basically just argued my point by arguing your's so poorly.

Again, prior to this ruling the government would never interfere with what you do with your own body ...

... except when it came to drugs, and even then doing drugs has never been illegal! Possessing them was (because, again, the constitution used to offer a protection against the government messing with your body, but not against you owning certain things).

*cough* Vax Mandate *Cough*

You don't support those either right?

[Reiwa]

Originally Posted by Elizondo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

*cough* Vax Mandate *Cough*

You don't support those either right?

Not a real mandate.

[Jibartik]

If you just sit there with your own body and not pay your taxes, you're gonna have a bad time...

[Elizondo]

Originally Posted by Jibartik [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

If you just sit there with your own body and not pay your taxes, you're gonna have a bad time...

The question that bear hats need to answer is at what stage during the pregnancy can we not perceive the baby as a bug to be stomped on if we don't want it

How many weeks

[unsunghero]

Originally Posted by Elizondo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

bug

Parasite

[robayon]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Again, Military actions are different from abortions. You cannot compare everything that has death as a possible result logically.

Otherwise abortions and disease are the same thing, as both involve death.

The point I am making is not that these are always equivalent, it's that you fellas do just as much post-death justification as the people you're criticizing of doing that. Which is hypocrisy. Opposition to the right to an abortion is not pro-life, it's anti-choice. Which is exceptionally hypocritical given all other things conservatives claim to value, and certainly authoritarian

[robayon]

Originally Posted by bomaroast [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Get rid of the politically correct language: the subject is abortion, so the language should be anti-abortion and pro-abortion.

Sure, fine