Cheating everywhere, GMs???

[Ennewi]

Originally Posted by Samoht [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

That's a lot of words just to say "we don't have any smoking gun after all"

The term "smoking gun" is a reference to an object or fact that serves as conclusive evidence of a crime or similar act, just short of being caught in flagrante delicto. "Smoking gun" refers to the strongest kind of circumstantial evidence, as opposed to direct evidence. Direct evidence would include the entire action; i.e. the action of pulling the trigger, firing the gun, and the victim falling.[1]

The phrase originally came from the idea that finding a very recently fired (hence smoking) gun on the person of a suspect wanted for shooting someone would in that situation be nearly unshakable proof of having committed the crime. A variant of the phrase (as "smoking pistol") is used in the Sherlock Holmes story, "The Adventure of the Gloria Scott" (1893).[2]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smoking_gun

Fun fact: Gemstones from Brell Rants Page 8 was referred to as Sherlock Fucking Holmes.

[Nutsax]

Originally Posted by Samoht [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

We don't know what was in the video. The owner deleted it probably because they don't want to be doxxed by Riot trolls.

I would chalk it up to consciousness of guilt:

Consciousness of Guilt is both a concept and a type of circumstantial evidence used in criminal trials by prosecutors. It refers to a powerful and highly incriminating inference that a judge or jury may draw from the statements or conduct of a defendant (accused) after a crime has been committed suggesting that the defendant knows he or she is guilty of the charged crime. In other words, the defendant's conduct after the crime is circumstantial (indirect) evidence that the defendant intended to commit the crime, or, in fact, committed the crime. Some of the most common types of consciousness of guilt are:

Fleeing from the crime scene or jurisdiction > Check
False statements and lies > Check
False alibi > Check
Changing name or personal appearance > Nope lol
Concealing or destroying evidence (including a body or weapon) > Check
Witness intimidation or bribery. > Check

[Porz]

Originally Posted by Nutsax [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I would chalk it up to consciousness of guilt:

Consciousness of Guilt is both a concept and a type of circumstantial evidence used in criminal trials by prosecutors. It refers to a powerful and highly incriminating inference that a judge or jury may draw from the statements or conduct of a defendant (accused) after a crime has been committed suggesting that the defendant knows he or she is guilty of the charged crime. In other words, the defendant's conduct after the crime is circumstantial (indirect) evidence that the defendant intended to commit the crime, or, in fact, committed the crime. Some of the most common types of consciousness of guilt are:

Fleeing from the crime scene or jurisdiction > Check
False statements and lies > Check
False alibi > Check
Changing name or personal appearance > Nope lol
Concealing or destroying evidence (including a body or weapon) > Check
Witness intimidation or bribery. > Check

Lol.

Changing name or personal appearance > Nope lol

Plastic surgery is a thing.. lmao

[Confit]

Originally Posted by Nutsax [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I would chalk it up to consciousness of guilt:

Consciousness of Guilt is both a concept and a type of circumstantial evidence used in criminal trials by prosecutors. It refers to a powerful and highly incriminating inference that a judge or jury may draw from the statements or conduct of a defendant (accused) after a crime has been committed suggesting that the defendant knows he or she is guilty of the charged crime. In other words, the defendant's conduct after the crime is circumstantial (indirect) evidence that the defendant intended to commit the crime, or, in fact, committed the crime. Some of the most common types of consciousness of guilt are:

Fleeing from the crime scene or jurisdiction > Check
False statements and lies > Check
False alibi > Check
Changing name or personal appearance > Nope lol
Concealing or destroying evidence (including a body or weapon) > Check
Witness intimidation or bribery. > Check

wut

[Nibblewitz]

Keep freaking out. It’s a good look on you.

[Samoht]

So there's a video deleted somewhere that Riot failed to rip? And you believe the video included some sort of damning evidence? Why wouldn't you rip it?

How do you know that he didn't delete it just because he didn't want to be doxxed by Riot trolls?

I mean, I wouldn't want my picture pasted all over the P99 forums if I looked like an AIDS patient, either.

[Ennewi]

I'm not wearing this ski mask to conceal my identity, I'm just insecure about my appearance. Those burnt documents? Embarrassing poetry!

[Porz]

Originally Posted by Ennewi [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I'm not wearing this ski mask to conceal my identity, I'm just insecure about my appearance. Those burnt documents? Embarrassing poetry!

"Uhh sorry sir, I did burn the documents but the other team found them first. Forgive me?"

[Viscere]

Notice how the staff dgaf ?

That's right, 'cause there is nothing to see in here but sore losers and cry babies kek

[Domo]

I am not a judge but I hope you guys find a way to fix this situation.

I dunno, maybe the accused scripter comes forward and says sorry so blue raiding can go back to normal.
Or if hes not scripting it would be nice to see him and his guild come forward and say that they understand that it looks like scripting but it isnt, but to bring peace back on the server they accept a new racing format/rule. or bag limits, or a rotation or something else.

Anyways, good luck to find peace again blue.
This whole story is for sure hurting the blue raiding scene.

(sorry about my english)