NY GRAND JURY VOTES TO INDICT TRUMP

[Origen]

Originally Posted by aussenseiter [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Without comment

Life is full of twists and turns!

[unsunghero]

Anyone saying that courts are infallible should also start campaigning for the death penalty because pretty sure “what if they got it wrong?” is the number one reason to be against it

[Trexller]

Originally Posted by Ooloo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I mean I think he did demonstrate that he is, in fact, no one to fool with.

either that or faye resnick's cartel connections got the wrong idea.

the manner of the murder is something that doesn't sit well, nicole and ron had columbian neckties (throat cut, tongue pulled through)

this isn't the work of a man who snapped

if it was OJ, it was all done in a 22 minute window

but we all know that man could run really fast

[Patriam1066]

Originally Posted by Ekco [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
>get asked by the press if you're running for reelection.
>forget where you are and proceed to shit your pants.

even Rome didn't get this fucking retarded.

Rome merged political and military authority

Mitch McConnell couldn’t lead a Girl Scout troop much less a legion

[Lune]

Originally Posted by Ooloo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The charges should be dismissed. That's what we should do, because they have no merit. The charges against OJ simpson should not have been dismissed, because they had a *ton* of merit- because they had a *ton* of unambiguous evidence against him. Get the difference yet?

lol

"The charges should be dismissed, because in my opinion they have no merit".

That's what courts are for! If they have no merit, they will be dismissed. Btw the mere fact that there have been indictments means a judge has looked at the evidence and determined there is a case worthy of trial. And I'm assuming based on your lack of an answer that you think ex-presidents should be immune to criminal prosecution, in which case it's time to send the Barack Obama, George Bush, Bill Clinton presidential immunity Voltron to mete out justice. They can pull Jimmy Carter's hospital bed behind too.

[Trexller]

in 1944, six-time Socialist Party candidate for US President Norman Thomas had thoughts about the Democratic Party.

“The American people will never knowingly adopt socialism. But, under the name of ‘liberalism,’ they will adopt every fragment of the socialist program, until one day America will be a socialist nation, without knowing how it happened…. I no longer need to run as a Presidential Candidate for the Socialist Party. The Democratic Party has adopted our platform.”

[aussenseiter]

Originally Posted by Lune [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Btw the mere fact that there have been indictments means a judge has looked at the evidence and determined there is a case worthy of trial.

Elaborate on the silly thing you said. Do you really think this?

[Lune]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Originally Posted by aussenseiter [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Elaborate on the silly thing you said. Do you really think this?

Learn what an indictment is.

Or, you know, read the constitution, specifically the fifth amendment.

[aussenseiter]

Originally Posted by Lune [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Btw the mere fact that there have been indictments means a judge has looked at the evidence and determined there is a case worthy of trial.

Originally Posted by aussenseiter [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Elaborate on the silly thing you said. Do you really think this?

Originally Posted by Lune [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Learn what an indictment is.

Or, you know, read the constitution, specifically the fifth amendment.

https://twitter.com/BadLegalTakes/

[Lune]

Originally Posted by aussenseiter [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

https://twitter.com/BadLegalTakes/

here ya go bud. Either a judge or grand jury has seen and evaluated the prosecution's evidence in all of Trump's trials.

The Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution states in part: "No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia when in actual service in time of War or public danger." The requirement of an indictment has not been incorporated against the states; therefore, even though the federal government uses grand juries and indictments, not all states do.[15] As of 2019, all states besides Pennsylvania and Connecticut still use grand juries to indict suspects for some offenses.[16]

In many jurisdictions that use grand juries, prosecutors often have a choice between seeking an indictment from a grand jury and filing a charging document directly with the court.[17] Such a document is usually called an information, accusation, or complaint, to distinguish it from a grand-jury indictment. To protect the suspect's due process rights in felony cases (where the suspect's interest in liberty is at stake), there is usually a preliminary hearing, at which a judge determines whether there was probable cause to arrest the suspect who is in custody. If the judge finds such probable cause, they bind, or hold over, the suspect for trial.[17]

The substance of an indictment or other charging instrument is usually the same, regardless of the jurisdiction: it consists of a short and plain statement of where, when, and how the defendant allegedly committed the offense. Each offense is usually set out in a separate count. Indictments for complex crimes, particularly those involving conspiracy or numerous counts, may run to hundreds of pages. In other cases, however, an indictment for a crime as serious as murder may consist of a single sheet of paper.

Indictable offenses are tried by jury, unless the accused waives the right to a jury trial. Even though the Sixth Amendment of the Constitution mandates the right to a jury trial in any criminal prosecution, the vast majority of criminal cases in the US are resolved by the plea-bargaining process.[17]