NY GRAND JURY VOTES TO INDICT TRUMP

[aussenseiter]

Originally Posted by Origen [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

A word that can be spelled wrong a few different ways, look it up yourself

Is political speech and statements usually justiciable?

[Lune]

It will be for a jury to decide [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Hope this helps.

[aussenseiter]

Originally Posted by Lune [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

It will be for a jury to decide [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Hope this helps.

Hey if you can't answer whether it was legal or not, you can't get mad at someone for asking if it was legal or not.

[Ooloo]

Originally Posted by Lune [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

It will be for a jury to decide [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Hope this helps.

There's literally no jury who could fairly decide a trump case, and that goes for juries that might be partial to him as well. He's too famous.

Also, the charges are completely ridiculous. If you actually care about blind justice, you might say something like "I hate trump but there's no way he gets a fair trial" etc... But you goons are like giddy over the prospect of him going to prison for a bajillion years on the flimsiest of charges.

He's not the bad guy in this scenario.

[Origen]

Originally Posted by Ooloo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Origen don't care bout nothin!

Yes, this is evident.

There's plenty of things I care about. But it isn't Bernie Sanders on trial

[Origen]

Originally Posted by aussenseiter [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Is political speech and statements usually justiciable?

Depends on the statements, my incendiary statements haven't yet led to a shitload of dumbasses doing attempted murder on Nancy Pelosi

[Lune]

Originally Posted by Ooloo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

There's literally no jury who could fairly decide a trump case, and that goes for juries that might be partial to him as well. He's too famous.

Also, the charges are completely ridiculous. If you actually care about blind justice, you might say something like "I hate trump but there's no way he gets a fair trial" etc... But you goons are like giddy over the prospect of him going to prison for a bajillion years on the flimsiest of charges.

He's not the bad guy in this scenario.

What do we do then. He has been charged with a crime. Should we just not try him? Are ex-presidents immune to criminal liability?

I think when every single American citizen is equally contaminated, no citizen is contaminated.

You were never going to find an American juror that hadn't heard of OJ Simpson.

[aussenseiter]

Originally Posted by Origen [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Depends on the statements, my incendiary statements haven't yet led to a shitload of dumbasses doing attempted murder on Nancy Pelosi

He was just a handyman helping Paul hang up an omelet in homage to Her Grace's graces.

[aussenseiter]

Originally Posted by Lune [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

What do we do then. He has been charged with a crime. Should we just not try him? Are ex-presidents immune to criminal liability?

It's a little bit of whiplash seeing this stance after the 2020 abolitionist rhetoric.

Just kidding, I knew it was insincere.

[Ekco]

had jury duty monday, reminded me how fucked our system is, they had to spend about 30 minutes explaining what "beyond a reasonable doubt" means after multiple people said they couldn't convict without being 100% sure and various other things people fucked up answers on for the questionnaire.

felt like i was in a scene from Idiocracy
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]