So how about that Zimmerman trial?

[Bodeanicus]

Originally Posted by Daldolma [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

suicide is a mortal sin, i would have to consult church leaders before any such sale

Killing teenage ******s in "self defense" is awesome, thought, right?

[K|mm Barely]

Confirmed.

[Misto]

A lot of misdirected hate in this thread. lol

[Kagatob]

Originally Posted by Misto [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

A lot of misdirected hate in this thread. lol

Welcome to R&F [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Misto]

Originally Posted by Kagatob [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Welcome to R&F [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Dis is teh rants n flameorz?

[Malice_Mizer]

Flamers abound!

[TarukShmaruk]

Honestly he's gonna get manslaughter because it's 6 women - a hen house - with no rooster to remind them that logic and evidence, not emotion, is supposed to justify their decision.

[Malice_Mizer]

Originally Posted by TarukShmaruk [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Honestly he's gonna get manslaughter because it's 6 women - a hen house - with no rooster to remind them that logic and evidence, not emotion, is supposed to justify their decision.

Are you honestly going to tell me that you aren't using emotion?

That's the laughable thing about this-- nothing is objective. Objectivity is a myth. You bring to the table your own preconceived notions about life. Logic and evidence serve to justify your own cognitive consistency, not the other way around, friend.

[Daldolma]

Originally Posted by TarukShmaruk [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Honestly he's gonna get manslaughter because it's 6 women - a hen house - with no rooster to remind them that logic and evidence, not emotion, is supposed to justify their decision.

flagrant sexism aside, i've heard this type of analysis frequently. basically, that the jury will split the difference with manslaughter based on the emotional pull of martin

i think that shows a sad lack of faith in the jurors. the evidence is flatly insufficient to disprove self defense. that should be the beginning and end of this case, and i believe that at least 1 of the jurors -- and ideally, all 6 of them -- will arrive at that conclusion. unless you agree that self defense has been disproved beyond a reasonable doubt, you cannot even convict him of manslaughter.

i find it very likely that he is acquitted, or at the least, that the jury is hung. if he is convicted, i believe the ruling would almost definitely be overturned on appeal

[Reapin]

Originally Posted by TarukShmaruk [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Honestly he's gonna get manslaughter because it's 6 women - a hen house - with no rooster to remind them that logic and evidence, not emotion, is supposed to justify their decision.

BS. Women are extreme in their beliefs. Racism, Religion what have you, they hunker down and tend to not use logic to make a decision. All they need is for one of those women to be a victim of a crime perpetrated by a black man and Zim is free.