PSA: ATTN - If you are bound in raid zones, read this

[p-niner]

Originally Posted by Elderan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Show the post where it stated you needed to change your bind from these zones before Sirkens post yesterday.

How many months aftet kunark release was it before u rolled here
again?

[Twain]

Originally Posted by Sirken [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

i'm sorry [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

i truly cant tell which of your guildies are simply trolling me for the sake of trolling me in this thread. if youre asking a legit question, you deserve a legit answer.

regardless of whether i think it was a good idea, the ability for players to bind themselves in Solb and Perma has been disabled. exactly why or when, i do not know. it was pointed out to me recently and i finally had time to check it out this week. after i saw it was true, in the essence of fairness, i made this thread.

bind was removed from from these zones for a reason, and for whatever reason the staff didnt want players bound there. Some players took this to mean they didnt have to change their bind (even though they were the entire reason binding was disabled, but moving on). Now instead of just straight out banning players, in the spirit of fairness, i decided to give all players until July 1, which i thought was a fair amount of time to rebind.

the reason they arent getting TD bind is because 1) TD is not a bindable zone at this point in the timeline. 2)why on earth would i reward players for trying to circumvent the server rules, or the staff's wishes?

this is not about trying to fuck one group or another group. this is about keeping things fair for EVERYBODY of all groups and guilds.

(consider that my last post in this thread, as i now consider the issue thoroughly explained)

I don't troll GMs dawg. Unless you were Zade, then I might. This is more of the answer I was looking for though. Thank you for that =).

[heartbrand]

Originally Posted by Sirken [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

i'm sorry [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

i truly cant tell which of your guildies are simply trolling me for the sake of trolling me in this thread. if youre asking a legit question, you deserve a legit answer.

regardless of whether i think it was a good idea, the ability for players to bind themselves in Solb and Perma has been disabled. exactly why or when, i do not know. it was pointed out to me recently and i finally had time to check it out this week. after i saw it was true, in the essence of fairness, i made this thread.

bind was removed from from these zones for a reason, and for whatever reason the staff didnt want players bound there. Some players took this to mean they didnt have to change their bind (even though they were the entire reason binding was disabled, but moving on). Now instead of just straight out banning players, in the spirit of fairness, i decided to give all players until July 1, which i thought was a fair amount of time to rebind.

the reason they arent getting TD bind is because 1) TD is not a bindable zone at this point in the timeline. 2)why on earth would i reward players for trying to circumvent the server rules, or the staff's wishes?

this is not about trying to fuck one group or another group. this is about keeping things fair for EVERYBODY of all groups and guilds.

(consider that my last post in this thread, as i now consider the issue thoroughly explained)

I wish you had posted in that spirit the first time, but I respect it. The only "issue" I have with your post is that this was a player requested feature, not a dev/staff requested feature, and as such, I would think or request that the issue be able to be revisited down the road to see if it had the intended effect that the players were hoping it would have. In my opinion, it has not.

[p-niner]

Originally Posted by heartbrand [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I wish you had posted in that spirit the first time, but I respect it. The only "issue" I have with your post is that this was a player requested feature, not a dev/staff requested feature, and as such, I would think or request that the issue be able to be revisited down the road to see if it had the intended effect that the players were hoping it would have. In my opinion, it has not.

Hehe nihilum requested feature, they cant even follow their own mandates