Best 4 person all caster/priest group

[Troxx]

Originally Posted by Ripqozko [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

We def making 200

Page 129.

If only Rip could have known. The last 30 pages were really painful to read.

DSM … your behavior in this thread has been beyond belief.

[Troxx]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

To answer Troxx's question, Cleric/Shaman/Enchanter/Enchanter could potentially do Vaniki, so this is a great combination for doing encounters at the limit of what this four player group of casters/priests could do.

Oh no no no … that is NOT the question I asked.

IF YOU ARE NOT ALLOWED TO POCKET A CLERIC, WOULD YOU EVER ACTUALLY CONSIDER REPLACING THE CLERIC (permanently) WITH A SHAMAN.

Answer the question.

The answer, of course, is no … but I want to either hear you say it or commit to saying otherwise.

It is literally a yes/no question.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Troxx continues to talk to himself.

I am glad to see he admitted he was wrong about the pocket character restriction. It is simply his subjective opinion on the title.

He has no objective evidence to supoort his claim. I have multiple pieces of objective evidence showing there is no pocket character restriction.

This means any arguments he has around pocket characters being restricted are invalid.

I answered his question when he answered mine, even though my answer has already been given.

[Snaggles]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You're the one that asked me if I had a 60 cleric first. And I responded by saying I could ask you the same question. Why is that offensive when you started it?

Troxx does indeed use player skill against other posters, so that assessment is incorrect too.

I’m not offended, trust me.

Also, in the post right before that I literally said I had a shaman. I’ve mentioned it for years, you know I do. Meanwhile I’ve never heard you mention a cleric outside why a shaman is better so I genuinely was curious if you were familiar with the class.

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Snaggles [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I’m not offended, trust me.

Also, in the post right before that I literally said I had a shaman. I’ve mentioned it for years, you know I do. Meanwhile I’ve never heard you mention a cleric outside why a shaman is better so I genuinely was curious if you were familiar with the class.

Thank you for clarifying your post. I did not read it as genuine curiousity, so I apologize for that.

[Troxx]

I will repeat:

Riddle me this? If the OP had stipulated that no pockets are allowed - would that change your answer? Or would you still drop the cleric?

Why are you so scared to answer? No evidence is needed. In an alternative thread where the above were true … what is your answer?

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Troxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I will repeat:

Riddle me this? If the OP had stipulated that no pockets are allowed - would that change your answer? Or would you still drop the cleric?

Why are you so scared to answer? No evidence is needed. In an alternative thread where the above were true … what is your answer?

The answer is irrelevant to this thread, as we both know there is no objective restriction on pocket characters. You admitted your pocket character restriction is completely subjective.

I said Shaman/Cleric/Enchanter/Enchanter on page one. For someone who is supposedly rereading the entire thread, I am suprised you picked that question as your dodge. Did you skip the first page?

[Troxx]

So your answer is that absent pocket clerics you would never drop the cleric. Good to know. Damn that took long enough.

So we really aren’t debating cleric vs shaman at all? Ok so it’s back to ench/ench/cleric/X

Glad we cleared that up.

If that wasn’t your answer, feel free to clarify what your answer actually is or admit that you are unwilling to provide an answer at all.

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Troxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

So we really aren’t debating cleric vs shaman at all? Ok so it’s back to ench/ench/cleri/X

Glad we cleared that up.

This is not correct, because pocket characters are allowed in this thread. You admitted the pocket character restriction was completely subjective. Objectively it doesn't exist, and you agree.

You can swap the Cleric for another class and pocket the cleric for the occasional CH and res.

[Troxx]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I swear we could make it to 1000 pages just asking this clown to answer a very straightforward question every time he posts a non-answer