Best 4 person all caster/priest group

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Troxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

pocket characters are not allowed in a thought-discussion that places very strict limitations on how many can come, what they can and can’t be, and which 4 (precisely 4) constitutes the best combination. I have already answered you.

Where did this restriction come from? You are just claiming this is the case without evidence. This is the question you keep dodging.

1. OP did not say they were prohibited.
2. Pocket clerics are a common practice on P99 already.
3. If you claim OP meant that you can only play four main characters and nothing else, then that would exclude mules too. OP didn't say this either.
4. Why would a normal person take a thread who's only rule is "best four person all caster group", and stop using mules and pocket clerics when they've already used them in the past?

[Troxx]

Originally Posted by Troxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Page 100!

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Up to page 100 and nothing noteworthy new other than … damn 100 pages. It may be a while before further recaps. Iirc Gloomlord arrives fully and the back and forth goes on for …. well … a long time.

Originally Posted by Troxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Riddle me this? If the OP had stipulated that no pockets are allowed - would that change your answer? Or would you still drop the cleric?

It’s a simple question that deserves a simple question. Care to answer?

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Troxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Up to page 100 and nothing noteworthy new other than … damn 100 pages. It may be a while before further recaps. Iirc Gloomlord arrives fully and the back and forth goes on for …. well … a long time.

Troxx dodged the question on pocket characters again. He has yet to tell us where this restriction of no pocket clerics came from. I can answer his question when he answers mine. He always does this, where he deflects with another question.

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Where did this restriction come from? You are just claiming this is the case without evidence. This is the question you keep dodging.

1. OP did not say they were prohibited.
2. Pocket clerics are a common practice on P99 already.
3. If you claim OP meant that you can only play four main characters and nothing else, then that would exclude mules too. OP didn't say this either.
4. Why would a normal person take a thread who's only rule is "best four person all caster group", and stop using mules and pocket clerics when they've already used them in the past?

[Troxx]

Page 101

Originally Posted by Troxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

100 pages is a huge accomplishment. I have never seen so little said in so many words. Special thanks to those who kept things rolling along. DSM should receive special recognition for his accomplishments within the field of Pathological Absurdity.

My only regret is that DSM never actually attempted to do the one thing he spent so long claiming he could do with his napkin math.

Jolly good job fellas.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Troxx’s closing diagnostic impression of DSM

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Purpose achieved. Fun times we’re had but now it’s time to

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Little did we know 440+ more pages would follow

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Another dodge, with Troxx continuing to talk to himself. It appears that Troxx has conceded the point. He does not have an answer for where the restriction of no pocket characters came from. He has made it up out of thin air.

Here is the evidence that supports Troxx has made the pocket character restriction up out of thin air:

1. OP did not say pocket characters were prohibited.
2. Pocket characters are a common practice on P99 already.
3. If you claim OP meant that you can only play four main characters and nothing else, then that would exclude mules too. OP didn't say this either.
4. Why would a normal person take a thread who's only rule is "best four person all caster/priest group", and stop using mules and pocket characters when they've already used them in the past?

His arguments against pocket characters are invalid until he can show where this restriction came from.

[Troxx]

Originally Posted by Troxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Riddle me this? If the OP had stipulated that no pockets are allowed - would that change your answer? Or would you still drop the cleric?

Simple question. Answers are binary in nature. Yes or no?

I’m still betting on you won’t answer. We all know why.

Edit: At page 112 - you spent the last 10ish pages talking about how your low level warrior without fungi is leveling faster than your enchanter with raid gear

Page 113:

Originally Posted by PlsNoBan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Hey guys did you know warriors solo better than enchanters? I'm DSM and I definitely do not have autism

[Elizondo]

550 pages in and DSM still can't admit he's wrong even though a video of him playing shaman so badly refutes all of his 'arguments'

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Troxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Simple question. Answers are binary in nature. Yes or no?

I’m still betting on you won’t answer. We all know why.

Dodging by asking another question. I'll answer your question, but you need to answer mine first. You do not get to ask another question to avoid a question.

Thus far Troxx hasn't provided any evidence that supports a pocket character restriction is in place for this thread. I have evidence against his claim too.

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Another dodge, with Troxx continuing to talk to himself. It appears that Troxx has conceded the point. He does not have an answer for where the restriction of no pocket characters came from. He has made it up out of thin air.

Here is the evidence that supports Troxx has made the pocket character restriction up out of thin air:

1. OP did not say pocket characters were prohibited.
2. Pocket characters are a common practice on P99 already.
3. If you claim OP meant that you can only play four main characters and nothing else, then that would exclude mules too. OP didn't say this either.
4. Why would a normal person take a thread who's only rule is "best four person all caster/priest group", and stop using mules and pocket characters when they've already used them in the past?

His arguments against pocket characters are invalid until he can show where this restriction came from.

[Troxx]

lol he still won’t answer the simplest yes/no question

Btw I made myself laugh. Thank you me from years ago

https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...postcount=1177

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Troxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

lol he still won’t answer the simplest yes/no question

Btw I made myself laugh. Thank you me from years ago

https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...postcount=1177

The post history shows that I asked him about where the pocket character restriction came from first. He then asked this question later in an attempt to dodge it.

I will answer his question (which has been already answered in this thread) after he answers the pocket character restriction question.

If I answer his question now, he will just pivot to that topic to avoid the pocket character restriction question. He always does this when he cannot answer a question.

Thus far the evidence shows Troxx has made up this pocket character restriction: https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...postcount=5435