Raid Suspension: The Mystical Order - Page 54

Samoht · #**531** 07-31-2014, 12:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HeallunRumblebelly [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

That's funny, both guilds have been doing this for > 6 months now.

assuming your time line is correct and that the petition from May was the first time actually petitioned, but that there are other petitions present, how many more suspensions can we expect for either guild as they catch up?

it's amazing how much better tears taste when they come from assholes.

Alarti0001 · #**532** 07-31-2014, 12:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Samoht [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

yawn. calls me clueless. tells me i need to learn. uses additional ad hominem "kiddo."

i'm not the one who got raid suspended.

who needs to learn the rules again?

You are assuming that the GM's are incapable of error and you want to quote logical fallacy?

Calling you a kiddo doesn't affect your argument. Negative language is ad hominem only if its used as an attempt to discredit a statement. You didn't provide a logical statement to even discredit.

Learn that logical fallacy, kiddo.

Alarti0001 · #**533** 07-31-2014, 12:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tiggles [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The sad fact is that the guy responding the Alarti already lost because, well...He responded to Alarti. Wonder how many more replies Alarti can get out of him before he realizes.

I've got the idiot hooked. He can't help himself.

Daldolma · #**534** 07-31-2014, 12:27 PM

please don't stop responding, alarti is lonely. this is his only social interaction. RIP online dating profile

Samoht · #**535** 07-31-2014, 12:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alarti0001 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You are assuming that the GM's are incapable of error and you want to quote logical fallacy?

Calling you a kiddo doesn't affect your argument. Negative language is ad hominem only if its used as an attempt to discredit a statement. You didn't provide a logical statement to even discredit.

Learn that logical fallacy, kiddo.

translation: alarti can't compete, knows he's wrong and refuses concede. alarti then resorts to circular logic where only alarti can be right and therefore everything said to contradict alarti has to be wrong even though alarti is proven wrong, so then alarti resorts to ad hominem language only to be called out on it but alarti knows he has still lost so he then deflects from the conversation and once again says something he knows is wrong passed off as fact in an attempt to perpetuate the trolling in an argument he's already lost.

but the reality of it all is that alarti is still raid suspended from VP.

and still a troll.

Yumyums Inmahtumtums · #**536** 07-31-2014, 12:28 PM

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Couldn't have been hard - apparently he has a long and rich history of obsessing over things on the internet that don't concern him.

Archalen · #**537** 07-31-2014, 12:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tiggles [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The sad fact is that the guy responding the Alarti already lost because, well...He responded to Alarti. Wonder how many more replies Alarti can get out of him before he realizes.

You say this a lot. Maybe if you say it 100 more times a non-TMO member will actually believe it.

Alarti0001 · #**538** 07-31-2014, 12:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Samoht [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

translation: alarti can't compete, knows he's wrong and refuses concede. alarti then resorts to circular logic where only alarti can be right and therefore everything said to contradict alarti has to be wrong even though alarti is proven wrong, so then alarti resorts to ad hominem language only to be called out on it but alarti knows he has still lost so he then deflects from the conversation and once again says something he knows is wrong passed off as fact in an attempt to perpetuate the trolling in an argument he's already lost.

but the reality of it all is that alarti is still raid suspended from VP.

and still a troll.

How did you prove anyone wrong? The evidence is clear, TMO has no viable reason to be suspended.

Please provide this damning evidence you must have to make a statement like that!....waiting...

Samoht · #**539** 07-31-2014, 12:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alarti0001 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

How did you prove anyone wrong? The evidence is clear, TMO has no viable reason to be suspended.

Please provide this damning evidence you must have to make a statement like that!....waiting...

hey man, the GMs agree with it because they reinstated the suspension after the review. your own denial of the situation isn't evidence that it's unjust.

Alarti0001 · #**540** 07-31-2014, 12:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Samoht [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

hey man, the GMs agree with it because they reinstated the suspension after the review. your own denial of the situation isn't evidence that it's unjust.

No.. the evidence used to create the suspension was evidence that no suspension was valid.

Also, they didn't reinstate the suspension Derubael just didn't remove the suspension because Sirken was a no show, and Deru didn't want to go against him.

Again, you are displaying your ignorance. Thanks!