NY GRAND JURY VOTES TO INDICT TRUMP

[Trexller]

Originally Posted by Origen [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

He uses multiple accounts, raise the stakes.

i doubt it, no one else uses Elizondo's umm, juvenile vernacular.

unless the guy spends his days switching between characters on the forum, but this would suggest an intelligence that i don't believe is there

take the bet!

[Origen]

Nope, bad bet, too narrow.

[Elizondo]

Originally Posted by Origen [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You avoided my multiple offers at bets. Raise the stakes of your bet, a day of no posting isn't shit. Let's make it about the election itself.

I linked the thread

The stakes were forever

https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...d.php?t=406702

No takers (including you)

Here are your responses

Originally Posted by robayon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I am not taking this bet either way. I've previously stated I believe he'll wriggle his way out of this jam just like he's wriggled out of every previous jam.

I hope I'm wrong.

Originally Posted by robayon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Yeah, nobody's taking you up on your bet because they're so afraid of your confidence in your position. It has nothing to do with the incredibly high stakes of... uh... whether or not we potentially post in off-topic.

Maybe raise the stakes and offer one whole Dogecoin [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Originally Posted by robayon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

It's also a bad wager because I personally need Elizondo to post.

and lawl at you accusing me of posting on multiple accounts when that is exactly what you do. Projection much?

[Trexller]

Originally Posted by Origen [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Nope, bad bet, too narrow.

you're afraid you'll lose to Elizondo and be forced onto another alt account

[unsunghero]

Nah, too few people posting already, no bets to leave

Other ideas:

Loser has to vote for the opposite candidate

Loser has to attend a Trump rally or a Drag Show, winner picks which

[aussenseiter]

Originally Posted by Lune [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Abortion? BAN IT
Gay marriage? BAN IT
Birth control? BAN IT
Puberty blockers? BAN EM
Drugs? BAN EM
Guns?

Look, banning things never works. People will find ways to get them.

Which of those things are currently banned by the United States?

[unsunghero]

Originally Posted by Lune [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Abortion? BAN IT
Gay marriage? BAN IT
Birth control? BAN IT
Puberty blockers? BAN EM
Drugs? BAN EM
Guns?

Look, banning things never works. People will find ways to get them.

Drugs really are in a league of their own here though

When we consider people “finding a way to get them”, this one has both a physical and the strongest psychological addiction of any substance in the world (if we talking meth or fent/tranq)

A straight man won’t suck a dick for a gun. A girl won’t take an ass pounding for a gun

Both will for some hard drugs

[unsunghero]

^
Also has ripple effects on the topic of the month: crime

I sure would love to drug test looters and see how many really are stealing to feed their kids or how many have UA’s coming back positive for fent or meth

[Trexller]

that got dark fast

lemme lighten the mood

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[magnetaress]

Originally Posted by aussenseiter [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Which of those things are currently banned by the United States?

Drugs and guns sort of.