tell me what you really think

[Azure]

No

[Hitpoint]

Originally Posted by Derubael [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I will point out, however, that way back at the end of 2013 I asked FE, TMO, and IB to draft up a set of "raid rules" that we could post for all to see. So far I've only received a list from 2 people, and they explicitly stated that their draft of the raid rules was their representation only and did not have the approval of their guilds' leadership. I still welcome someone to draft up a list of raid rules for everyone to be able to reference, feel free to include a loose outline of what punishments are given for what if you'd like.

Okay cool, thanks for the response. Maybe I'll work on something like this when I'm feeling motivated. The hard part seems like it would be getting other guilds to agree though.

[Ella`Ella]

Originally Posted by Hitpoint [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Okay cool, thanks for the response. Maybe I'll work on something like this when I'm feeling motivated. The hard part seems like it would be getting other guilds to agree though.

I started this with Sloan a while ago. I can sum this up pretty easily - full Non-CSR/PnP in VP as this is the root of all our problems and doesn't effect class -R.

[TMBLOW]

Originally Posted by Ella`Ella [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I started this with Sloan a while ago. I can sum this up pretty easily - full Non-CSR/PnP in VP as this is the root of all our problems and doesn't effect class -R.

I can translate this pretty easily:

TMO wants the barrier for entry to VP to be unobtainable for any guilds not named TMO

[Alarti0001]

Originally Posted by TMBLOW [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I can translate this pretty easily:

TMO wants the barrier for entry to VP to be unobtainable for any guilds not named TMO

So you are saying TMO is better than everyone else? I can go with that

[Lazie]

Originally Posted by Ella`Ella [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I started this with Sloan a while ago. I can sum this up pretty easily - full Non-CSR/PnP in VP as this is the root of all our problems and doesn't effect class -R.

I hate to say it but it's probably the best idea. At least then one guild can't petition another when they fuck up and get rewarded for being bad.

[Ella`Ella]

Originally Posted by Sirken [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

never under estimate the power of "one guild"

Are you saying what I think you're saying?

[Lazie]

Originally Posted by Sirken [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

never underestimate the power of "one guild"

First you botch a call and blame an obvious IB train on us. Now the english language. To be fair though I botch the english language sometimes too. See how easy a mistake can be fixed ? [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Oleris]

Originally Posted by Sirken [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

never under estimate the power of "one guild"

or one individual.

[Pokesan]

Originally Posted by Brynnag [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Everyone who takes this vidya game so seriously that they need to form a united nations in pixel form to decide who gets what and when should prob stop playing and hang themselves.