Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Blue Community > Blue Server Chat

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41  
Old 11-18-2012, 08:05 PM
Hailto Hailto is offline
Planar Protector

Hailto's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 1,501
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mishami [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Explain to me how its more fair for 1 person to potentially get all the loot in a group?.
It's fair because its completely random you idiot, how can we simplify this any more for you?

Should i be at a disadvantage because my name starts with M over a guy who has a character named Aalpha, when there is no way to determine ahead of time how many gems will drop and how long the group will last?
__________________
Blue:
[60 Oracle] Kaludar (Barbarian)
[35 Enchanter] Droxzn (Skeleton)
[XX Rogue] Hailto (Half-Elf)
Red:
[21 Wizard] Hailto (Dark-Elf)
Last edited by Hailto; 11-18-2012 at 08:10 PM..
  #42  
Old 11-18-2012, 08:06 PM
Zehv9 Zehv9 is offline
Orc


Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 37
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mishami [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
How can the alpha system be abused? I have seen a person win all the loot in a group before as well...more than once and I know its not a grand scheme to rob someone of loot its just unfair to not just me but everyone. personally I feel if i win something the next thing that drops pending on its worth i would just give to the other person. I have no problem doing that because im not a selfish person that is my point.
You're right, I shouldn't have said only. Fixed that.

Though like I said, there's nothing unfair about it. It is by the definition of the word, fair.
  #43  
Old 11-18-2012, 08:14 PM
theaetatus theaetatus is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 265
Default

If only one item drops in a group and one person gets it, in Mishami's eyes they are a 'lootwhore' as they got all the items that dropped. In order to not be considered a 'lootwhore' they should make a note of all the names of the people in the group, request their email addresses and give the next 5 items they receive to these people. This is the only fair solution.
__________________
Wazzock - Ogre Warrior
Pillock - Iksar Monk
Urgh - Troll Shadowknight
Twerp - Ogre Shaman
Numpty - Halfling Warrior
Tosser - Gnome Enchanter
  #44  
Old 11-18-2012, 09:06 PM
Sturgeon Sturgeon is offline
Kobold

Sturgeon's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 169
Default

Stop being a pussy and say something.

To be honest you sound like a loot whore who is bitter that someone else got all of the drops this time around.
__________________
  #45  
Old 11-18-2012, 11:31 PM
Spitty Spitty is offline
Fire Giant

Spitty's Avatar

Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 705
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mishami [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Greed all is strangers powerlooting someone's char moron. what im describing is making so everyone gets a loot...!!!!!! omfg
You aren't making a lick of sense.

Stop. Just...stop what you're doing. It's embarrassing me as an oxygen-consuming life form.
__________________
[60 ORACLE] SPITULSKI <The A-Team>
Batmanning today for a better tomorrow.
  #46  
Old 11-18-2012, 11:55 PM
Furniture Furniture is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: May 2011
Location: ny
Posts: 441
Default

lets not get in to this again, just end it with any item that drops is an upgrade for anyone and it is greedy to just claim the item for a "need",

NBG- Greedy
Greed - fair

edit: before some idiot says "HOW IS IT AN UPGRADE FOR EVERYONE IF ITS MONK ONLY", remember that if its tradeable then it is sellable which = an upgrade for every class
  #47  
Old 11-19-2012, 12:27 AM
Furniture Furniture is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: May 2011
Location: ny
Posts: 441
Default

i just read the op's post now, my bad and i blame it on the marijuana, the previous still stands, but in regards to what your saying it is completely fair since it is a random chance for everyone, you win some you lose some, i can see how it would be a lot nicer for everyone to split everything equally and that can be discussed but if someone wins multiple rolls and then decides that he doesnt want to share, it would be unfair to penalize him for his decision, it should have been determined beforward and thats just being a whiny bitch, you will get lucky one day (maybe) and win lots of randoms in a seb group
  #48  
Old 11-19-2012, 01:02 AM
Spitty Spitty is offline
Fire Giant

Spitty's Avatar

Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 705
Default

They legalized it in NY too? Hot damn!
__________________
[60 ORACLE] SPITULSKI <The A-Team>
Batmanning today for a better tomorrow.
  #49  
Old 11-19-2012, 01:53 AM
fastboy21 fastboy21 is offline
Planar Protector

fastboy21's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,179
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mishami [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I did not take part in it because it inspires a bad personality type and for the last time I'm not talking about need before greed I'm talking about greed rolls and yes "loot whore" was invented because people wanting to roll on everything. I wish people had just actually played live so they know what they are talking about...
I played on live, from virtually day one...

It never ceases to amaze how some folks assume that anyone who disagrees with them is somehow ignorant. Can it possibly be that people who know all about EQ, played on live, etc just simply don't agree with you???

You are talking about "need vs. greed" (whether you want to or not) because it is tied to the decision about how to allow rolling and assigning of loot.

There is a difference between fair and equal. Equal means everyone in the group gets the same thing, fair means they get the same process. It is very possible to be fair without everyone getting an equal share of the booty.

In any case, its been debated for over a decade at this point and I don't see it being brought to any special conclusion here in this thread.

The best way to avoid problems related to loot is to make sure the loot rules are clear and explained when a group forms and to tell new people who join the group. Most problems related to loot arguments happen when there are no agreed upon rules upfront and then something valuable drops. Its too late at that point to try to assign loot rules, and arguments suddenly appear.
  #50  
Old 11-19-2012, 02:09 AM
Spitty Spitty is offline
Fire Giant

Spitty's Avatar

Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 705
Default

Right. Set the expectation. Discuss. Possibly collaborate and listen.

Life lessons right there.

Or, try and browbeat an entire group into playing by your version of the rules and see how quickly your bank explodes with untold riches.
__________________
[60 ORACLE] SPITULSKI <The A-Team>
Batmanning today for a better tomorrow.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:13 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.