Epic for Ninik!

[OngorDrakan]

You have my fists! As much as a Lvl 39 can punch before being burned to ashes...

[Wotsirb401]

Hope you brought a ton of socks if you think Naggy is spawning anytime soon

[maverixdamighty]

no sabbath we must farm sebilis keys again first!

[Xatava]

expect to see some benevolent charity towards untagged alts of "top tier raiding guilds" after this ruling



lul

[Metallikus]

Originally Posted by Xatava [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

expect to see some benevolent charity towards untagged alts of "top tier raiding guilds" after this ruling



lul

Yes, I have no idea what the thought process was with allowing raid suspended guilds to interfere with non raid suspended guilds on raid targets.....

[Ele]

Originally Posted by Metallikus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Yes, I have no idea what the thought process was with allowing raid suspended guilds to interfere with non raid suspended guilds on raid targets.....

Where does it say interfere? She said assist Ninik.

[Daldaen]

This Ninik person seemed pleasant, but does anyone else get annoyed by her posts always being in character?

[Szeth]

Obviously missed the post where she addressed us fighting over her making her sad.

Completely out of the NiNik character.

[PureLo]

So according to the Amelinda quote and her coming in here in regards to this as was stemmed from another forum. I am curious since it clearly states that IB couldn't "engage" (insert mob list here) YET while training around in fear whenever the whole BDA/VD fiasco thing went down yesterday they technically ENGAGED Draco... where is their further suspension?

Why hasn't there been any speech or action toward this... you can argue whether it was intentional to train in order to help VD... but again last time I checked Draco doesn't go NEAR the zone in unless pulled there/aggro'd and those both fall into the definition of engagement... so again will there but a further suspension or penalty?

This charitable thing seems nice and a good step into a "greater" server, but why stop at just 1 good person and not apply these friendly dealings overall?

[Lanuven]

Originally Posted by PureLo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

So according to the Amelinda quote and her coming in here in regards to this as was stemmed from another forum. I am curious since it clearly states that IB couldn't "engage" (insert mob list here) YET while training around in fear whenever the whole BDA/VD fiasco thing went down yesterday they technically ENGAGED Draco... where is their further suspension?

Why hasn't there been any speech or action toward this... you can argue whether it was intentional to train in order to help VD... but again last time I checked Draco doesn't go NEAR the zone in unless pulled there/aggro'd and those both fall into the definition of engagement... so again will there but a further suspension or penalty?

This charitable thing seems nice and a good step into a "greater" server, but why stop at just 1 good person and not apply these friendly dealings overall?

Ambrotos' response to this the other night was something like ..and i didnt get it in logs, but " BDA shouldnt have been poking their heads in the zone without someone first going in and seeing if it was cleared."
When they cleared the zone before going to hate. The zone doesnt repop that fast so why worry about draco or a train being at the zone in. no one pulls draco to the zone in to kill him with an already cleared zone.

Ambrotos popping off with a stupid comment like that just shows that theres more to the story thats not being talked about.