Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Red Community > Red Server Chat

View Poll Results: read the post for the question
That would be a slap in the face. 79 42.93%
Seems reasonable. 105 57.07%
Voters: 184. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-20-2012, 11:06 AM
Rutaq Rutaq is offline
Orc

Rutaq's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 40
Thumbs up

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nizzarr [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
With the current exp bonus, id be looking even more for boxers.

Ban them.
^
__________________
RED - 19 Human Monk <Brotherhood>
  #2  
Old 02-20-2012, 12:26 PM
Nirgon Nirgon is offline
Banned


Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Ruins of Old Paineel
Posts: 14,465
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nizzarr [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
With the current exp bonus, id be looking even more for boxers.

Ban them.
No mercy for them imo, agree.

I could be boxing Bundy while farming money and shit.

So I get caught after 2 weeks? Big deal, I get a week off and he's got +2lvls.

BAN.
  #3  
Old 02-20-2012, 12:49 AM
gnomishfirework gnomishfirework is offline
Fire Giant

gnomishfirework's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 734
Default

As long as they get their ip exemption revoked, I see no reason not to allow them access to one account.

Ban them a week or whatever, and that's sufficient punishment. I mean, if they aren't a douche bag id rather have one more ex-boxer than one less player.

It's not like a 2 boxer is trying to cause anyone else problems.
__________________
Rephaite - Green99
  #4  
Old 02-20-2012, 02:24 AM
Dullah Dullah is offline
Planar Protector

Dullah's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 2,241
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gnomishfirework [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
As long as they get their ip exemption revoked, I see no reason not to allow them access to one account.

Ban them a week or whatever, and that's sufficient punishment. I mean, if they aren't a douche bag id rather have one more ex-boxer than one less player.

It's not like a 2 boxer is trying to cause anyone else problems.
This.

If someone boxing is doing something that griefs other players, or is in some way engaged in something that exploits or hurts the server, I can see them being permabanned.


Otherwise, suspend them for a couple weeks and revoke their exemption.

The server is virtually dead at this point. People are probably boxing to make up for the lack of groups.

Suspend/Revoke Exemptions. Permaban those who have been warned or been in trouble in the past.

We can't afford to lose anyone people at this point...
__________________
  #5  
Old 02-21-2012, 05:09 AM
taysk8 taysk8 is offline
Aviak


Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 52
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gnomishfirework [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
As long as they get their ip exemption revoked, I see no reason not to allow them access to one account.

Ban them a week or whatever, and that's sufficient punishment. I mean, if they aren't a douche bag id rather have one more ex-boxer than one less player.

It's not like a 2 boxer is trying to cause anyone else problems.
.
  #6  
Old 02-20-2012, 12:52 AM
doobiesnizax doobiesnizax is offline
Scrawny Gnoll


Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 29
Default

well there needs to be some form of testing to ensure people are actually 2boxing its been said a few times people are banned due to some newb reporting them when someone is afk plvling from the same household or someone has 2 chars from the same household doing a transfer in EC....some people run weird networks that aren't all detected properly by there supposed new software, IE ad-hoc and using laptops and pc's for accesspoints ect
my point being that its a bit harsh to ban people from a server for something as menial as having 2 chars logged in, when there seems to be alot more crap going on in regards to exploiting atm....so u 2box a group and keel a mob, whats the difference if i keel or exp the same mobs solo using a exploit 80% of the server solo's anyways because of the exp penalties some group mates can add. the BS about people not being able to level due to 2boxing is crap pure try finding a group past 2am pst when the server population is 100 and 30 of them are afk in EC
  #7  
Old 02-20-2012, 12:54 AM
Ssleeve Ssleeve is offline
Banned


Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 437
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by doobiesnizax [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
well there needs to be some form of testing to ensure people are actually 2boxing its been said a few times people are banned due to some newb reporting them when someone is afk plvling from the same household or someone has 2 chars from the same household doing a transfer in EC....some people run weird networks that aren't all detected properly by there supposed new software, IE ad-hoc and using laptops and pc's for accesspoints ect
my point being that its a bit harsh to ban people from a server for something as menial as having 2 chars logged in, when there seems to be alot more crap going on in regards to exploiting atm....so u 2box a group and keel a mob, whats the difference if i keel or exp the same mobs solo using a exploit 80% of the server solo's anyways because of the exp penalties some group mates can add. the BS about people not being able to level due to 2boxing is crap pure try finding a group past 2am pst when the server population is 100 and 30 of them are afk in EC
no ones reading that wall of text l2forum
  #8  
Old 02-20-2012, 12:59 AM
bigeasy bigeasy is offline
Kobold


Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 102
Default

I think if somebody with an ip exemption gets caught 2 boxing, the first course of action should be removing the IP exemption + 1-2 week vacation. If the person does not have an IP exemption and is boxing, then they're determined to do so and would believe the action would be a 2-4 week vacation then a perma ban and nothing less

Perma-anything on a server that barely eclipses 100 pop on a busy night is overkill, and detrimental to server's health.

Also let's put things in perspective people, 2 boxing was legal on live as long as you had the money to pay for another subscription. I would not categorize it in the same boat as exploiting or duping for a clear advantage.
  #9  
Old 02-20-2012, 01:05 AM
doobiesnizax doobiesnizax is offline
Scrawny Gnoll


Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 29
Default

sorry ssleeve its more text then you can comprehend http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GlKL_EpnSp8
  #10  
Old 02-20-2012, 01:11 AM
Ssleeve Ssleeve is offline
Banned


Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 437
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by doobiesnizax [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
sorry ssleeve its more text then you can comprehend http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GlKL_EpnSp8
You're dumb if you think anyone read that. I'm just the one who informed you
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:03 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.