P1999 pet xp today, experiences

[bhatz01]

Poor change. Put it back.

[Bazia]

This is now a NERF SHAMAN thread.

[Tamiah2011]

Originally Posted by Bazia [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

This is now a NERF SHAMAN thread.

Learn to play a shaman,...noob

[Slave]

Originally Posted by Estu [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Between dot damage and melee damage, I feel like shamans can do a lot of damage to a monster relative to their pet. This is helped by the fact that the pet is at most a light blue con to the shaman.

I soloed one to 54 in 8 days /played, and with the change I would have been quite worried... and I had a fungi, fbss, gfg, and jbb. It's certainly not against the realm of possibility that someone without 300k of gear would be down about this change and what it means for shaman exp. What it essentially does is dictate the exact method you need to be killing mobs, decreasing your gameplay options (and to much slower and inefficient ones at that).

Not very fun...

[bhatz01]

I look at classic as all or nothing. If pets generate 0 aggro, you can't allow pet xp to work this way. If pets are adjusted to hold significantly more hate, then you can keep this.

Choose one.

[Sabin76]

Originally Posted by HawkMasterson1999 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

What about fire pets damage shield? Maybe its my imagination but it seems like DS damage doesn't count towards your pets percentage. At lvls 20 - 25ish with a fire pet I seem to get full exp from aviaks with just 1 or 2 nukes of 96dmg each.

Unless I'm mistaken, DS damage of any kind is not attributed to anyone or anything. It basically lowers the mobs total HP.

Example: If a mob has 500 HP and the DS does a total of 150 damage, then you only have to do 176 damage ((500 - 150)/2 + 1) to get full XP, as opposed to 251 damage.

[Droxx]

Originally Posted by Slave [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I soloed one to 54 in 8 days /played, and with the change I would have been quite worried... and I had a fungi, fbss, gfg, and jbb. It's certainly not against the realm of possibility that someone without 300k of gear would be down about this change and what it means for shaman exp. What it essentially does is dictate the exact method you need to be killing mobs, decreasing your gameplay options (and to much slower and inefficient ones at that).

Not very fun...

This.

[Scratch&Sniff]

Originally Posted by Nivar Quartz [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Trolling solo class? heh

Ah the old days, when we solo'd side by side in karnors or burning woods. speaking of overpowered non-nerfed classes, you go shaman!

Buff up the raid, slow the mob, cast topher/gopher once or twice and canni spam the raid away [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

True! Its all True.

Also, here is a recipe for waffle cookies,

Step one.
Make Cookie dough.

Step two.
Insert cookie dough into waffle iron.

Best results if ultra high first.

[mala]

Originally Posted by bhatz01 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I look at classic as all or nothing. If pets generate 0 aggro, you can't allow pet xp to work this way. If pets are adjusted to hold significantly more hate, then you can keep this.

Choose one.

THIS

[SwordNboard]

Originally Posted by bhatz01 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I look at classic as all or nothing. If pets generate 0 aggro, you can't allow pet xp to work this way. If pets are adjusted to hold significantly more hate, then you can keep this.

Choose one.

+1