![]() |
|
#1
|
|||||
|
![]() Quote:
And people have leveled troll/ogre sks just fine. Quote:
Eq is tough, that's what makes it great. You still are not leveling as slow as a troll/ogre sk, with more utility and less downtime as well. I was going to continue quoting more people up in arms about a classic change, but what's the point. You're eq players, you're supposed to have thicker skin. Adapt. | ||||
Last edited by DarthPeon; 10-24-2011 at 05:32 AM..
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
![]() Quote:
| |||
|
#3
|
||||
|
![]() Quote:
Actually If any of you knew this history of this server, When p99 first went live the 1 point of damage requirement for pet classes was live, then in the Febuary 18 2010 patch they changed it to the 50% damage requirement, which caused quite an uproar including Guineapig our super-mod =) The very next patch Rogean changed it back to the 1 point of damage requirement. Now they are changing it back again. Its for Red99 folks, And *hopefully* after that server has been up for a while they will revert it again. It truely is a retarded rule IMHO. | |||
|
#4
|
||||
|
![]() Quote:
| |||
|
#5
|
|||
|
![]() yeah, that earth pet root is so reliable...
my mage is only 54 though. perhaps the next pet is better. haha | ||
|
#6
|
|||
|
![]() One more thing...
Even in the new system the pet takes 75% of the experience if you don't do any damage. What this shows is that even the new system is paranoid. Just not as much as the old one. My guess is the new system fixed some exploits and the developers were confident.
__________________
Full-Time noob. Wipes your windows, joins your groups.
Raiding: http://www.project1999.com/forums/sh...&postcount=109 P1999 Class Popularity Chart: http://www.project1999.com/forums/sh...7&postcount=48 P1999 PvP Statistics: http://www.project1999.com/forums/sh...9&postcount=59 "Global chat is to conversation what pok books are to travel, but without sufficient population it doesn't matter." | ||
|
#7
|
|||
|
![]() In a way, this is the same kind of thing that happened to hybrids. They gave them an experience penalty because they thought their soloing capabilities were too powerful. In a similar way, they thought that AUTO-defend pets are too powerful. Maybe not so much in terms of their stats, but in the many potential circumstances that one can 'dream' up. If you're paranoid, like a developer, you dream...
In both cases, there's a subjective feeling of dread. It's not concrete fact. This makes it shaky ground. Same thing happens in real world matters. When concrete facts aren't available, we tend to invent goblins and ghosts and little hitlers. In the absence of true knowledge, our innermost fears come out.
__________________
Full-Time noob. Wipes your windows, joins your groups.
Raiding: http://www.project1999.com/forums/sh...&postcount=109 P1999 Class Popularity Chart: http://www.project1999.com/forums/sh...7&postcount=48 P1999 PvP Statistics: http://www.project1999.com/forums/sh...9&postcount=59 "Global chat is to conversation what pok books are to travel, but without sufficient population it doesn't matter." | ||
Last edited by stormlord; 10-23-2011 at 10:17 AM..
|
|
#8
|
|||
|
![]() This shouldn't affect charm exp I don't believe.
| ||
|
#9
|
|||
|
![]() So how does a necro solo now? fear kiting is out of the question. I would be better fighting without a pet now because it does 70-80% of the damage and i still use most of my mana dotting slowing and fearing.
| ||
|
#10
|
|||
|
![]() Tired of random nerfs to "classic" when so much isn't classic
| ||
|
![]() |
|
|