Poll: Should the Management have been harsher with the 365 cheaters?

[RandySlopeJr]

Originally Posted by Knuckle [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

this poll rocks, too bad its not a democracy here or wed see some pixel griefing much needed!

Its ashame that the P1999 staff dosn't even care what the people that play think about it.

[Vohl]

@rere:I've already stated my reason - I'm thinking of the bigger picture. What's your motive, moving this poll into RnF where nobody will pay attention to it?

[Demetrium]

Don't quite understand why a full list of the cheaters wasn't published. I imagine it wouldn't take much work and it would let each player decide the level punishment they'd deliver upon the cheaters be it blacklisting, ridicule, or forgiveness.

To me hiding their names way more of a "gimmie" to the hackers than letting them keep their items/lvl 54. Keeping them anonymous? Son, I am disappoint.

[Dirtnap]

Why are they not unbanning all accounts that were banned previously for cheating?

[Vohl]

Originally Posted by Striiker [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Rogean popped on last night Saturday) and said that a 50% XP bonus was in effect. I think this should stay in effect for the duration of the suspensions. This is a little way to further penalize the cheating players and reward those who didn't cheat.

http://www.project1999.org/forums/sh...ad.php?t=46744

[Shrubwise]

I will be releasing a complete list of all cheaters in a little less than two weeks. I plan on using an extremely dependable detective command, "/ all 54".

[Humerox]

Ya...except for:

Originally Posted by Galahad [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Just because I like numbers;



Where are you getting the level 54 from? Based on my calculations the character should end up somewhere between 24% and 99% experience in level 52 depending on how far into level 60 they were.

I whipped up a quick spreadsheet with calculations.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/...JMWnc&hl=en_US

Note that the 24% to 99% holds for all race/class combinations.

Originally Posted by Rogean [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You might be right and I could have mis-typed 54 instead of 52. At this point, I forget what my test server result was.

[Vohl]

/role and /anon get them past that command as well. I suppose a level 52 alt in EC or some dungeons /conning everyone they come across might get a good idea of who got bit.

[Cuff'em]

Why would you compile a list of lvl 54 or 52 players? This makes no sense, many of you seem to think it was lvl 60 players who were cheating, I'm sure many were lower lvls, not to mention what about the toons who are currently lvl 54 and 52?

It would be a witch hunt to compile a list of toons without ligit knowledge of who these players are.

Come on people get your heads out of your butt.

[Spacebar]

I voted no. Everybody deserves a chance to correct their wrongs. However, if they do it again, BURN THEM!

Also, I like the idea of some type of flag to indicate which ones were banned. Maybe like a perma-pvp flag for like 5 months or something for all characters on that account [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

A side note, I bet some of those poop-socking douchers who are now 52 will love getting back to Naggy and Vox.