Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Green Community > Green Server Chat

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-18-2024, 11:23 PM
Troxx Troxx is offline
Planar Protector

Troxx's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: The sands of DSM’s vagina
Posts: 4,284
Default

lol someone else brought it up, I just replied
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist View Post
There is no fail message for FD.
https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...43&postcount=2



.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-18-2024, 11:25 PM
DeathsSilkyMist DeathsSilkyMist is offline
Planar Protector

DeathsSilkyMist's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 8,349
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Troxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
lol someone else brought it up, I just replied
Indeed. Learn some self control so you do not derail more threads.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-18-2024, 11:25 PM
Penish Penish is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 760
Default

yeah pockets are tods viableh
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-19-2024, 02:05 AM
Troxx Troxx is offline
Planar Protector

Troxx's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: The sands of DSM’s vagina
Posts: 4,284
Default

It’s a dumb fucking question because the implication is that a 52 cleric is just as viable as a level 60 cleric. Nevermind the 8 level difference as it relates to resists on lull/stuns - you literally are missing all spells 53-60. No divine light. No stun command. No Elixir HoT.

Why level a cleric to 60 when you can just leave it 52?

Jesus you’re such a myopic twat
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist View Post
There is no fail message for FD.
https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...43&postcount=2



.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-19-2024, 02:13 AM
DeathsSilkyMist DeathsSilkyMist is offline
Planar Protector

DeathsSilkyMist's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 8,349
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Troxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
It’s a dumb fucking question because the implication is that a 52 cleric is just as viable as a level 60 cleric. Nevermind the 8 level difference as it relates to resists on lull/stuns - you literally are missing all spells 53-60. No divine light. No stun command. No Elixir HoT.

Why level a cleric to 60 when you can just leave it 52?

Jesus you’re such a myopic twat
I understand you don't like it. The reality is a 52 cleric can handle Chardok Royals, as an example. This is why Cleric is a good pocket character. They don't need to be 60 to do what people want them to do. I am just looking at the reality of how people play the game. I see you also couldn't name any content either.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-19-2024, 02:16 AM
Troxx Troxx is offline
Planar Protector

Troxx's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: The sands of DSM’s vagina
Posts: 4,284
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I understand you don't like it. The reality is a 52 cleric can handle Chardok Royals, as an example. This is why Cleric is a good pocket character. They don't need to be 60 to do what people want them to do. I am just looking at the reality of how people play the game. I see you also couldn't name any content either.
lol this was a situation you were unaware of - both in acknowledging it required a cleric or at what low level it had been accomplished…. Until someone else told you about it quite recently in that other thread.

Now you have just assimilated another bullshit talking point you are disingenuously representing … for reasons beyond my comprehension.

There is quite a power curve between a 52 cleric and a 60 cleric.

You really are clueless
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist View Post
There is no fail message for FD.
https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...43&postcount=2



.
Last edited by Troxx; 07-19-2024 at 02:18 AM..
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-19-2024, 02:27 AM
DeathsSilkyMist DeathsSilkyMist is offline
Planar Protector

DeathsSilkyMist's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 8,349
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Troxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
lol this was a situation you were unaware of - both in acknowledging it required a cleric or at what low level it had been accomplished…. Until someone else told you about it quite recently in that other thread.

Now you have just assimilated another bullshit talking point you are disingenuously representing … for reasons beyond my comprehension.

There is quite a power curve between a 52 cleric and a 60 cleric.

You really are clueless
You were the one who couldn't name Chardok Royals as a camp for tens of pages, dodging and trolling instead.

I see you still haven't named a camp where the 60 cleric can do it, while the 52 cleric can't for this trio. More dodging.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-19-2024, 02:10 AM
Zuranthium Zuranthium is offline
Planar Protector

Zuranthium's Avatar

Join Date: May 2011
Location: Plane of Mischief
Posts: 1,907
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Chardok Royals can be done with a level 52 Cleric.
Chardok Royals have been done unreliably with a 52 Cleric and a couple of 60 ENCHANTERS. Like, hello?!? Something is wrong with the processing unit upstairs. Please for your own sake, look into a better diet and exercise regime, I am betting something is going very awry there. Need to drink more water, cut out processed food and excess sugars, intake more essential vitamins and minerals, do stretches and aerobics, get the blood flowing, gain clarity, find centering.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-19-2024, 02:43 AM
Troxx Troxx is offline
Planar Protector

Troxx's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: The sands of DSM’s vagina
Posts: 4,284
Default

Different thread, same bullshit.

Jesus Christ.

For the record, this is the right answer:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toxigen [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
No enchanters allowed because lets face it they're way too powerful.

I'll start:

Necro / Shaman / Monk

All iksar, start together at level 1, bigly RP lizardbros, can do well with low budget twinking or self-found, great off-meta Kunark leveling route.

There you go DSM, you finally got your Shaman in a "Best Group" hypothetical.
I’m not sure why you’re going full retard talking pockets and 52 vs 60 clerics.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist View Post
There is no fail message for FD.
https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...43&postcount=2



.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-19-2024, 02:55 AM
DeathsSilkyMist DeathsSilkyMist is offline
Planar Protector

DeathsSilkyMist's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 8,349
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Troxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Different thread, same bullshit.

Jesus Christ.

For the record, this is the right answer:



I’m not sure why you’re going full retard talking pockets and 52 vs 60 clerics.
The post history shows that you and Jimjam started discussing pocket characters first. I didn't start this. You need to learn some self control, so you stop derailing threads. You do this all the time. Same bullshit indeed.

Keebz said this:

Quote:
Also, a 52 pocket cleric doesn't unlock any challenging content.
This implies a higher level cleric does unlock challenging content for this trio. I was curious to see what that content was. You then attacked my question and derailed the thread further. You've also been unable to answer it.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:33 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.