![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
Quote:
I've watched exactly that happen enough times to agree it's a potential limitation that he was right to bring up. Slow aggro may even be the most common cause of failure for monk/shaman in the toughest areas. That being said, it's also a manageable limitation that won't actually stop monk/shaman from doing the same encounters, even if they might die once in awhile due to bad RNG rolls on chain resists. SK also has an easier time kiting from a distance for a pre-slow if you want to take that route, like for Lodizal duo. Shaman/Monk get it done too so none of it's insurmountable. These are also very specific, difficult types of duo content that most player duos seldom or never attempt. For more ordinary areas it's a nonissue. DN pebala ratmen was a tough one for us to figure out to do duo. Snare was pretty important there, root being less desired due to unstunable gaters. Monk based duo could manage it but at a disadvantage. Most people will do that type of area only as part of a larger group or small raid. SK had a slight theoretical advantage in Charasis due to more HP for soaking multiple-mob harm touches, but in practice the monk-based duo is stronger there due to faster killrate making it easier to keep ahead of that zone's fast respawn rate. | |||
|
#2
|
|||
|
DSM off his meds again eh?
| ||
|
#3
|
|||
|
If I was going to duo a sham and SK I would probably roll Cazic for diety. The symbol quests would make fear kiting in those early levels far better until slow/heal is more efficient. Could even go Iksar with some faction work.
I like my Inny troll for the clinging darkness neck and halfling mask but more in theory. I seldom use those. https://wiki.project1999.com/Discipl...of_Cazic_Thule https://wiki.project1999.com/Initiat...of_Cazic_Thule A warrior or rogue with a snare proc weapon would work nice too. This ratio is hot garbage but level 15 proc is quite nice. https://wiki.project1999.com/Glaive_of_Marltek | ||
|
Last edited by Snaggles; 11-02-2023 at 07:27 PM..
| |||
|
#4
|
|||
|
Do you realise I was talking about the thread where you said 2 Enchanters and 1 Cleric would prefer a root rotting Shaman over a Magician? That was one of the audacious arguments I was talking about.
I didn't say root rotting was an unviable tactic for leveling, did I? You're putting words into my mouth, which is a specialty of yours, isn't it? You're crazy, DSM. I mean that, genuinely. Edit: Ah, yes. Another stealth edit from the legend. If I was ranting and raving, hypocrite, then don't respond. | ||
|
Last edited by Gloomlord; 11-02-2023 at 07:45 PM..
| |||
|
#5
|
||||
|
Quote:
The only person twisting people's words is yourself. I never told people to "prefer" one type of DPS over the other. Each group can take whatever classes they want. My argument has always been that a Shaman can output pretty good DPS if the group wants the shaman to act as a pure DPS role in a group. You are the one making stuff up about my arguments lol.
__________________
| |||
|
#6
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
#7
|
|||
|
You're all wrong. Dsm has the data to back his claims. I've went over the spread sheets and couldn't believe it myself.
| ||
|
#8
|
|||
|
Are we really going to have this conversation again, DSM? Do I, or anyone else here, need to explain to you AGAIN why a charm group does not want a root rotting Shaman?
Fuck it! Why don't we throw your stupid comebacks right back at you?! 1000+ posts of trolling nonsense from an insane child. You've discredited yourself, DSM!!! | ||
|
#9
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
| |||
|
#10
|
|||
|
It's fine when you say stupid things to discredit people, but it's not fine when they throw it back at you.
Moral myopia, DSM. Look into it! Guess 20+ people lost in that thread against you, didn't they? Truly you are an EQ genius at work when you suggested root rotting in a charm group. Whatever helps you endure yourself everyday, I suppose. | ||
![]() |
|
|