Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Class Discussions > Tanks

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-02-2023, 03:23 PM
Danth Danth is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,326
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Troxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I haven’t seen many if any wipes from a sham/monk duo due to aggro and inability to land slow. Typically at that level of gameplay where a slow is critically needed to succeed - both players are seasoned enough that they know how to roll with the punches. Wipes under these circumstances is honestly a player skill issue.
(wanted to add a little, can't edit)

I've watched exactly that happen enough times to agree it's a potential limitation that he was right to bring up. Slow aggro may even be the most common cause of failure for monk/shaman in the toughest areas. That being said, it's also a manageable limitation that won't actually stop monk/shaman from doing the same encounters, even if they might die once in awhile due to bad RNG rolls on chain resists. SK also has an easier time kiting from a distance for a pre-slow if you want to take that route, like for Lodizal duo. Shaman/Monk get it done too so none of it's insurmountable. These are also very specific, difficult types of duo content that most player duos seldom or never attempt. For more ordinary areas it's a nonissue.

DN pebala ratmen was a tough one for us to figure out to do duo. Snare was pretty important there, root being less desired due to unstunable gaters. Monk based duo could manage it but at a disadvantage. Most people will do that type of area only as part of a larger group or small raid. SK had a slight theoretical advantage in Charasis due to more HP for soaking multiple-mob harm touches, but in practice the monk-based duo is stronger there due to faster killrate making it easier to keep ahead of that zone's fast respawn rate.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-02-2023, 08:16 AM
Penish Penish is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 764
Default

DSM off his meds again eh?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-02-2023, 07:23 PM
Snaggles Snaggles is online now
Planar Protector


Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 3,555
Default

If I was going to duo a sham and SK I would probably roll Cazic for diety. The symbol quests would make fear kiting in those early levels far better until slow/heal is more efficient. Could even go Iksar with some faction work.

I like my Inny troll for the clinging darkness neck and halfling mask but more in theory. I seldom use those.

https://wiki.project1999.com/Discipl...of_Cazic_Thule
https://wiki.project1999.com/Initiat...of_Cazic_Thule

A warrior or rogue with a snare proc weapon would work nice too. This ratio is hot garbage but level 15 proc is quite nice.
https://wiki.project1999.com/Glaive_of_Marltek
Last edited by Snaggles; 11-02-2023 at 07:27 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-02-2023, 07:37 PM
Gloomlord Gloomlord is offline
Fire Giant

Gloomlord's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: Australia
Posts: 683
Default

Do you realise I was talking about the thread where you said 2 Enchanters and 1 Cleric would prefer a root rotting Shaman over a Magician? That was one of the audacious arguments I was talking about.

I didn't say root rotting was an unviable tactic for leveling, did I? You're putting words into my mouth, which is a specialty of yours, isn't it?

You're crazy, DSM. I mean that, genuinely.

Edit: Ah, yes. Another stealth edit from the legend. If I was ranting and raving, hypocrite, then don't respond.
Last edited by Gloomlord; 11-02-2023 at 07:45 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-02-2023, 07:45 PM
DeathsSilkyMist DeathsSilkyMist is offline
Planar Protector

DeathsSilkyMist's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 8,205
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gloomlord [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Do you realise I was talking about the thread where you said 2 Enchanters and 1 Cleric would prefer a root rotting Shaman over a Magician? That was one of the audacious arguments I was talking about.

I didn't say root rotting was an unviable tactic for leveling, did I? You're putting words into my mouth, which is a specialty of yours, isn't it?

You're crazy, DSM. I mean that, genuinely.
I am not putting words in your mouth. If you can root rot in a duo (which is a group), you can root rot in a group of 4 people. If you agree a shaman can root rot in a duo, you agree a shaman can root rot in a group of four people. I am not sure why this concept is so difficult for you.

The only person twisting people's words is yourself. I never told people to "prefer" one type of DPS over the other. Each group can take whatever classes they want. My argument has always been that a Shaman can output pretty good DPS if the group wants the shaman to act as a pure DPS role in a group. You are the one making stuff up about my arguments lol.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-03-2023, 08:50 AM
Penish Penish is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 764
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gloomlord [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Do you realise I was talking about the thread where you said 2 Enchanters and 1 Cleric would prefer a root rotting Shaman over a Magician? That was one of the audacious arguments I was talking about.

I didn't say root rotting was an unviable tactic for leveling, did I? You're putting words into my mouth, which is a specialty of yours, isn't it?

You're crazy, DSM. I mean that, genuinely.

Edit: Ah, yes. Another stealth edit from the legend. If I was ranting and raving, hypocrite, then don't respond.
lol'd again
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-03-2023, 09:48 AM
Infectious Infectious is offline
Planar Protector

Infectious's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,268
Default

You're all wrong. Dsm has the data to back his claims. I've went over the spread sheets and couldn't believe it myself.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-02-2023, 07:50 PM
Gloomlord Gloomlord is offline
Fire Giant

Gloomlord's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: Australia
Posts: 683
Default

Are we really going to have this conversation again, DSM? Do I, or anyone else here, need to explain to you AGAIN why a charm group does not want a root rotting Shaman?

Fuck it! Why don't we throw your stupid comebacks right back at you?!

1000+ posts of trolling nonsense from an insane child. You've discredited yourself, DSM!!!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-02-2023, 07:51 PM
DeathsSilkyMist DeathsSilkyMist is offline
Planar Protector

DeathsSilkyMist's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 8,205
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gloomlord [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Are we really going to have this conversation again, DSM? Do I, or anyone else here, need to explain to you AGAIN why a charm group does not want a root rotting Shaman?

Fuck it! Why don't we throw your stupid comebacks right back at you?!

1000+ posts of trolling nonsense from an insane child. You've discredited yourself, DSM!!!
Thanks for continuing to show you are just a ranting and raving troll. Please stop posting off topic nonsense every time you see me posting in a thread. It just looks crazy. You don't have to follow me around and rehash an argument you lost. It's ok to be wrong.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-02-2023, 07:56 PM
Gloomlord Gloomlord is offline
Fire Giant

Gloomlord's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: Australia
Posts: 683
Default

It's fine when you say stupid things to discredit people, but it's not fine when they throw it back at you.

Moral myopia, DSM. Look into it!

Guess 20+ people lost in that thread against you, didn't they? Truly you are an EQ genius at work when you suggested root rotting in a charm group.

Whatever helps you endure yourself everyday, I suppose.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:20 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.