Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Green Community > Green Server Chat

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-23-2022, 11:17 AM
cd288 cd288 is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Apr 2018
Posts: 4,516
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
What they "should have" isn't really relevant on a 10 year old server stuck on the same timeline.

A lot of people twink their characters, and Silver Chitin Hand Wraps + Staff of Battle is like 700pp for both on Blue lol.
Oh wow so you're doing your moving the goalposts thing again. Your original position across threads has been "Warriors are better DPS than charmed mobs"

Now when someone points out how your argument is flawed and your parses are cherry-picked useless data, you move the goalposts to "a twinked out warrior is better DPS than charmed mobs"

Well boys, let's settle in for the long haul here because we all know what's about to happen. We're going to get a 300 page thread with 1k posts from DSM where he shifts his argument 100 times. Getting the popcorn ready again.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-23-2022, 10:40 AM
Danth Danth is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,326
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cd288 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
So a lot of writing to say exactly what I said, which is that twinkled warriors might be somewhat viable. Like you said overleveled weapons that aren’t realistic that someone of that level should actually have
Well, yeah, I'll try to post at times even when in broad agreement because it helps counteract the natural tendency towards forum negativity, disagreement being a frequent driving force of forum discussions.

As for how realistic it is for someone to have out-leveled equipment, depends on where you're at. P1999, today, Green or Blue both, it's plenty realistic and probably nearer than not to standard. Fresh server, new Green, they're going to have those 6/26 axes if even anything that high or mighty.

Danth
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-23-2022, 11:02 AM
DeathsSilkyMist DeathsSilkyMist is offline
Planar Protector

DeathsSilkyMist's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 8,205
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Danth [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Well, yeah, I'll try to post at times even when in broad agreement because it helps counteract the natural tendency towards forum negativity, disagreement being a frequent driving force of forum discussions.

As for how realistic it is for someone to have out-leveled equipment, depends on where you're at. P1999, today, Green or Blue both, it's plenty realistic and probably nearer than not to standard. Fresh server, new Green, they're going to have those 6/26 axes if even anything that high or mighty.

Danth
Exactly. OP didn't specify the timeline, and it sounds like he is referring to the current time. On a fresh server Enchanters will obviously do better than a Warrior, because good ratio weapons and haste items are not easy to come by in Vanilla. But in that situation you put up with helping Warriors level because you need them when Kunark drops.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-22-2022, 01:31 PM
PlsNoBan PlsNoBan is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 815
Default

I have leveled every EQ class to 50+ for the record. Some many times over. Lots of them twinked fairly heavily. I've done enchanter EASILY 5+ times 50+ across multiple servers including original classic back in the day, p99, multiple TLP's. I feel like I have a pretty good understanding of this game as a whole and the power levels of various classes. Enchanter especially. No random one off parse is going to change my mind.
__________________
1: Mage is a better group DPS class than Shaman
2: Enchanters solo better than Warriors

These statements are not up for debate amongst sane human beings
Why does <Vanquish> allow DSM to be a member?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-22-2022, 01:41 PM
Toxigen Toxigen is offline
Banned


Join Date: Jan 2021
Posts: 4,776
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PlsNoBan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I have leveled every EQ class to 50+ for the record. Some many times over. Lots of them twinked fairly heavily. I've done enchanter EASILY 5+ times 50+ across multiple servers including original classic back in the day, p99, multiple TLP's. I feel like I have a pretty good understanding of this game as a whole and the power levels of various classes. Enchanter especially. No random one off parse is going to change my mind.
I think if I ever come back I'm going to de-level Toxigen to 5 and get some sweet solo logs for DSM to sperg over.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-22-2022, 02:11 PM
cd288 cd288 is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Apr 2018
Posts: 4,516
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PlsNoBan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I have leveled every EQ class to 50+ for the record. Some many times over. Lots of them twinked fairly heavily. I've done enchanter EASILY 5+ times 50+ across multiple servers including original classic back in the day, p99, multiple TLP's. I feel like I have a pretty good understanding of this game as a whole and the power levels of various classes. Enchanter especially. No random one off parse is going to change my mind.
Yeah I mean the thing with a one off parse is it's useless in an RNG game like classic EQ.

There are times where the RNG is just gonna go against what the general trend should be. Like if you did 1,000 parses I bet you there's gonna be like 200 (just using a very rough guess) where the warrior out DPSes a charmed and hasted mob. It just happens sometimes because it's RNG.

You also need to factor in any buffs the warrior may have had along with the specific mob's (both the enemy mob in both cases, and the charmed mob's) overall stats. You also need to look at the Warrior's STR, which can be increased significantly with gear that people would probably not call "twink" gear. But anyway, we've been over all this with respect to DSM's parses before. He takes one parse, provides minimal details, and then goes "TeH dAtA pRoVeS mE rIgHt guyessss". It's not useful data.

Thankfully he isn't involved in any sort of important profession that affects our lives, such as scientific trials, otherwise we could be in deep trouble.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-22-2022, 07:41 PM
DeathsSilkyMist DeathsSilkyMist is offline
Planar Protector

DeathsSilkyMist's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 8,205
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PlsNoBan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I have leveled every EQ class to 50+ for the record. Some many times over. Lots of them twinked fairly heavily. I've done enchanter EASILY 5+ times 50+ across multiple servers including original classic back in the day, p99, multiple TLP's. I feel like I have a pretty good understanding of this game as a whole and the power levels of various classes. Enchanter especially. No random one off parse is going to change my mind.
The only thing that matters for this thread is what the P99 data shows today. It could very well have felt different during live, for example, because most people had crap gear. You didn't have a lot of Warriors with a weapon like Wurmslayer, or a good haste item.

It could have even been a bit different when you leveled your Enchanter on P99 if it was years ago.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-22-2022, 07:47 PM
PlsNoBan PlsNoBan is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 815
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
The only thing that matters for this thread is what the P99 data shows today. It could very well have felt different during live, for example, because most people had crap gear. You didn't have a lot of Warriors with a weapon like Wurmslayer, or a good haste item.

It could have even been a bit different when you leveled your Enchanter on P99 if it was years ago.
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
__________________
1: Mage is a better group DPS class than Shaman
2: Enchanters solo better than Warriors

These statements are not up for debate amongst sane human beings
Why does <Vanquish> allow DSM to be a member?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-23-2022, 12:45 AM
unsunghero unsunghero is offline
Banned


Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 8,467
Default

I have seen so many twinked monks (I assume twinked) as I was leveling, that it made the monk class seem like the most broken in the game

I’d be thinking I was OP soloing stuff in Sol B on enc, then some monk would come in who was 5 levels lower than me and be wrecking stuff doing fast hits of like 120 damage, killing much faster than me since I was relying on a charmed mob that’s whiffing like crazy miss miss miss miss miss “wow this shit is boring why can’t they hit each other”, meanwhile the monk has killed like 3 mobs at 5 levels lower than me

Only now in around the mid-50’s have charmed mobs been able to match the twinked monk’s damage, but I bet they still aren’t swinging as fast or hitting as often without buffs
Last edited by unsunghero; 09-23-2022 at 12:47 AM..
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-23-2022, 12:49 AM
PlsNoBan PlsNoBan is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 815
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by unsunghero [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I have seen so many twinked monks (I assume twinked) as I was leveling, that it made the monk class seem like the most broken in the game

I’d be thinking I was OP soloing stuff in Sol B on enc, then some monk would come in who was 5 levels lower than me and be wrecking stuff doing fast hits of like 120 damage, killing much faster than me since I was relying on a charmed mob that’s whiffing like crazy miss miss miss miss miss “wow this shit is boring why can’t they hit each other”, meanwhile the monk has killed like 3 mobs at 5 levels lower than me

Only now in around the mid-50’s have charmed mobs been able to match the twinked monk’s damage, but I bet they still aren’t swinging as fast or hitting as often without buffs
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

No mention whether your charms are hasted/weaponized or if they have any pet toys. I can probably see a heavily twinked monk outdamaging a charm if it's not hasted and doesn't have weapons. Those monks could have CoF and be fully buffed with fungi tunics for all we know. Not really a fair comparison and lots of unknown variables. Also this just in: Monks do more damage than warriors
__________________
1: Mage is a better group DPS class than Shaman
2: Enchanters solo better than Warriors

These statements are not up for debate amongst sane human beings
Why does <Vanquish> allow DSM to be a member?
Last edited by PlsNoBan; 09-23-2022 at 12:55 AM..
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:58 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.