![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#2
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#3
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#4
|
|||
|
Weber calls bureaucracy the iron cage.
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#5
|
|||
|
Well yeah...
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#6
|
|||
|
Bureaucracy is organization and coordination. It's the only way yet devised to run a country at scale, and for all its flaws, it works.
For the intricate and complex Roman bureaucracy which persisted between emperors, this thread provides an accessible overview: https://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistoria...an_bureaucracy For the 20th century, it suffices to look at how the militaries of the great powers were run. Every single one that proved successful was a bureaucratic machine. Here's a brief defence of military bureaucracy from an officer and instructor at West Point: https://mwi.usma.edu/defense-military-bureaucrat/ So since this is R&F, might I suggest that if you genuinely think bureaucracy is anything but essential and necessary, you have your head up your arse. | ||
|
|
|||
|
#7
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#8
|
|||
|
You should. If you can find a better way to run a trillion dollar military, let's hear it.
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#9
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
![]() |
|
|