Null

[Macken]

In my opinion the compromise they settled on is the best solution. Los check at beginning only, with no penalties such as less damage if not in los on spell landing.

I believe a spell penalty for not having end of cast los is an unwarranted pressure against picking an already weak arche type: intelligence caster.

I also believe wormoct's idea of EQ is him running after int casters, with them always running away with no hope of fighting back. No hope of ever landing a spell in a dungeon etc...They are to obviously take the place of the greenies he used to kill by the 1000's.

Sometimes to check if it's even, you have to put the shoe on the other foot. Double los check makes melee virtually invulnerable in some zones. Imagine if in some zones casters where virtually invulnerable.

Any partial nerf would be partially guilty of the above.

[wehrmacht]

Originally Posted by Macken [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

He's too challenged to figure out that Crazycloud is even saying he got snared with 100mr.

Because just like I already mentioned in my post, it had something like a 1 out of 50 chance of landing on someone with 120MR. Sure it could land but the chances were like winning the lottery.

Hey look, it's the fucking August 11, 2004 patch notes:

- Spells now have a minimum chance of landing of 5%, up from 2%.

What do you know? I was exactly right and Macken is wrong as usual. My post said there was probably a resist cap of 95-99% and it was 98% during this era.

http://www.necrotalk.com/showthread.php?t=2295

[Macken]

Originally Posted by wehrmacht [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Because just like I already mentioned in my post, it had something like a 1 out of 50 chance of landing on someone with 120MR. Sure it could land but the chances were like winning the lottery.

Hey look, it's the fucking August 11, 2004 patch notes:

- Spells now have a minimum chance of landing of 5%, up from 2%.

What do you know? I was exactly right and Macken is wrong as usual. All my posts say there was 100% resistance to 100 mr.

Too late. You have been quoted over and over saying otherwise. Proof readily available all over these forums.

Macken is right. wormoct wrong again.

Proven by macken, wormoct, lethdar, and about 50 other posters. ( i still can't believe you post stuff that contradicts your very own words and you are too dumb to know it).

Lies will only make you look more stupid if possible.

[Macken]

Originally Posted by wehrmacht [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Good god, this little kid named Macken made like 10 posts in 3 seconds crying in every one of them. Everyone knows to land a spell on EQ live, there was a line of sight check at the begging and at the end of your cast. You just made up that lie out of thin air saying there was only one LOS check. It was changed to one LOS check for TZVZ only.
.

Heres another one of your asinine quotes that you will be denying in a few days when the heat gets too hot for you again on these forums.

[wehrmacht]

I don't know what null's current opinion on it is. The context of the post is that we were talking about pre-luclin line of sight checks and Macken was claiming spells on SZ required 0 line of sight checks because he could use a pet exploit to nuke people through walls.

I searched for "line of sight" on TZVZ boards and get an avalanche of people claiming that walls and water did block spells.

The patch notes in Null's post are saying a line of sight check existed when the server launched (because SZ was released before that patch) yet other people say there wasn't one in game so if it was temporarily like that, it was obviously a temporary mistake they made then corrected it.

Next we have a post by Xebeken claiming that when they did correct it, they added a double line of sight check. Macken claimed there never was a double line of sight check, obviously this is wrong. The double line of sight check was still there until the day I stopped playing which was right before Luclin came out. So Velious did in fact end with not one, but two line of sight checks, and all this talk of zero line of sight checks on Sullon Zek was just some accident they made for like a week or something.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Macken]

Originally Posted by wehrmacht [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I don't know what null's current opinion on it is. The context of the post is that we were talking about pre-luclin line of sight checks and Macken was claiming spells on SZ required 0 line of sight checks because he could use a pet exploit to nuke people through walls.

I searched for "line of sight" on TZVZ boards and get an avalanche of people claiming that walls and water did block spells.

The patch notes in Null's post are saying a line of sight check existed when the server launched (because SZ was released before that patch) yet other people say there wasn't one in game so if it was temporarily like that, it was obviously a temporary mistake they made then corrected it.

Next we have a post by Xebeken claiming that when they did correct it, they added a double line of sight check. Macken claimed there never was a double line of sight check, obviously this is wrong. The double line of sight check was still there until the day I stopped playing which was right before Luclin came out. So Velious did in fact end with not one, but two line of sight checks, and all this talk of zero line of sight checks on Sullon Zek was just some accident they made for like a week or something.

Liar.

I've said more than once they had a double los check for about a week or so and changed it back because even though they weren't smart enough to know it was a bad idea before they did it. They were smart enough to know after they did it. Roughly half of SZ's time was with no los check of any kind. The other half was with 1 los check at beginning. Your time on SZ was nothing but 0, zero or no checks at all. Period. That's reason #123098023 that you are a known idiot.

You come to these boards making extreme absolute claims, get proven wrong over and over, refuse to admit it, become hell bent on being crowned the absolute Moron on High and continue bull-headed making a fool of yourself while trying to dig up posts from fans trying to tell Jordan how to play basketball.

The worst part of it is, you are too dumb to see the LULZ in all of it.

Everyone thinks you are an idiot.

Almost literally everyone bro.

You should look in the mirror and take stock of your life.

You digging up posts from fans trying to tell Jordan how to play basketball does have good comedic value though.

[Foxx]

Originally Posted by Macken [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Everyone thinks you are an idiot.

qft

[wehrmacht]

Lol look how mad Macken is. I post a link to his little butt buddy Xebeken talking about there being 2 LOS checks and he starts raging and trying to change his story. It was like that till the end of velious, the 0 LOS thing was a temporary mistake they made. So sorry for you.

And omg, plz don't insult me by saying "everyone from TZVZ thinks I"m an idiot". I really care about what the most useless human demographic on earth thinks (ie: 30 heresy members that made up 90% of the server population).

Can we discuss Vigg and Rodney's distaste for my preference in architecture next? Don't know how I could sleep at night without rectifying that situation.

[minakto]

wehr you appear madder. Dont toss stones, they ricochet and hit you in the skull

[Smedy]

Walls of text

Also this thread was derailed horribly, can we get back praising null and his jesus like pvp coding skills?