![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#2
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#3
|
||||
|
Quote:
We get it, you use GINA and or ZlizEQMap and or nParse and don't want to not use GINA and or ZlizEQMap and or nParse. | |||
|
|
||||
|
#4
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#5
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#7
|
|||
|
Maybe whataboutism? "You think this change should be more classical, but what about x y and z that aren't realistically changeable!"
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#8
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#9
|
|||
|
I don't get why people get so upset over what other people use.
It doesn't affect you. If you're a better person/player without that stuff fine. But don't talk shit. If you believe in your mind of minds that Gina, ZlizEQMap and Gamparser makes the playfield unfair. You have nobody but yourself to blame. Don't be throwing a fuckin pity party for yourself and demand other people live your righteous path. facts
__________________
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#10
|
|||
|
I use GINA on Blue. There is no pity party. He asked what advantages it gives and I listed advantages it gives me over someone not using it off the top of my head.
That speech is a little yeesh. Righteous path? Sorry the idea of someone suggesting logging be turned off makes you this upset. | ||
|
|
|||
![]() |
|
|