Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Green Community > Green Server Chat

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-07-2019, 05:36 PM
astuce999 astuce999 is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Québec
Posts: 492
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Glasken [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
*ahem*

I did mention a bard tank. And put them where they belong.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
You used it as a verb and not a noun, doesn't count [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Astuce
  #2  
Old 10-07-2019, 05:45 PM
sciception sciception is offline
Kobold


Join Date: Sep 2019
Posts: 122
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by astuce999 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
You used it as a verb and not a noun, doesn't count [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Astuce
I wonder if the Bards are going to have that over the top AE mezz at launch.
  #3  
Old 10-07-2019, 05:01 PM
bum3 bum3 is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Fort Smith, AR
Posts: 402
Default

^ they get some massive agro songs and wear plate. From my experience they typically start to run in circles when a hard hitting mob gets on them... =)
  #4  
Old 10-08-2019, 09:21 AM
Cen Cen is offline
Planar Protector

Cen's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 2,235
Default

I think Rangers are a really great class. Its like a melee blender version of a bard, where the bard focuses more on casting. Harmony, flame lick, decent armor options and respectable damage.
__________________
  #5  
Old 10-08-2019, 09:39 AM
sciception sciception is offline
Kobold


Join Date: Sep 2019
Posts: 122
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cen [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I think Rangers are a really great class. Its like a melee blender version of a bard, where the bard focuses more on casting. Harmony, flame lick, decent armor options and respectable damage.
Comparing the two:

https://wiki.project1999.com/Ranger#Combat_Skills

https://wiki.project1999.com/Warrior#Combat_Skills

Warrior's seem to get more of everything defensively, mitigation tables aside. Even double attack is higher than a Rangers. I don't see much of anything the Ranger excels at over a Warrior, but for leveling purposes the snap-agro class always wins. I seriously may try Ranger tanking. I think it will bother me not taking this opportunity to know.
  #6  
Old 10-08-2019, 09:42 AM
Deathrydar Deathrydar is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,673
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sciception [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Comparing the two:

https://wiki.project1999.com/Ranger#Combat_Skills

https://wiki.project1999.com/Warrior#Combat_Skills

Warrior's seem to get more of everything defensively, mitigation tables aside. Even double attack is higher than a Rangers. I don't see much of anything the Ranger excels at over a Warrior, but for leveling purposes the snap-agro class always wins. I seriously may try Ranger tanking. I think it will bother me not taking this opportunity to know.
I really think that if someone ever wanted to start a Ranger, NOW is the time at Green's launch!
  #7  
Old 10-08-2019, 10:02 AM
Jimjam Jimjam is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 12,821
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sciception [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Comparing the two:

https://wiki.project1999.com/Ranger#Combat_Skills

https://wiki.project1999.com/Warrior#Combat_Skills

Warrior's seem to get more of everything defensively, mitigation tables aside. Even double attack is higher than a Rangers. I don't see much of anything the Ranger excels at over a Warrior, but for leveling purposes the snap-agro class always wins. I seriously may try Ranger tanking. I think it will bother me not taking this opportunity to know.
Are we looking at the 50 or 60 caps?
  #8  
Old 10-08-2019, 10:36 AM
sciception sciception is offline
Kobold


Join Date: Sep 2019
Posts: 122
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimjam [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Are we looking at the 50 or 60 caps?
50
  #9  
Old 10-08-2019, 10:43 AM
Dolalin Dolalin is offline
Planar Protector

Dolalin's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 2,565
Default

In classic Ranger will suffer a bit due to chain mitigation vs plate, but realistically, all tank classes will be complete balls next to mage/necro pets, so whatever.
  #10  
Old 10-08-2019, 12:01 PM
Palemoon Palemoon is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 848
Default

I can see warriors being DPS in groups leveling up. It won't be bad to have both a knight AND a warrior in the group, especially since the warrior will be taking less xp than anyone else in the party.

I can see the knights pulling and bringing mobs to the camp, the warrior jumps on it and as soon as agro is transfered the knight goes back out for another mob. This leaves the much higher DPS (ranger/monk/warrior) in the party doing that DPS.

People really need to play what they want, good players will make things work.

Will groups of mages have a advantage? yes, but I bet you they will be killing the same amount of mobs in Lguk as the melee heavy group down the hallway because it will be so crowded there won't be excess amounts of mobs to take.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:43 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.