Quest Issue: Ring of the Dead

[Tobius]

The thing is, What about those of us who want to get the ring fixed, and use it in time to bind in timorous deep.

Even if we can find your "undeniable proof" what if we cannot find it in time to bind in timorous deep?

We will have missed our window, and that doesn't seem fair, wheres the trust man. Could you not nerf all the rings already in possession, "some people being bound somewhere kind of convinient untill they eventually get rebound somewhere" is not going to break the game.

[vazdru]

Getting the faction to recharge the ring is going to be a literal nightmare. I have been working on it for some time and haven't seen any movement yet. Still, since it can be done it makes the item worth a lot of trouble.

I wish I could supply sufficient proof needed to show it was clickable from inventory on live. I think any proof is deniable, as is the request to make it as it is on live.

[uygi]

Still no word on what kind of proof Nilbog needs, so I'll give the easy stuff here:

Proof that it is currently clickable by all on live now (What we have on P99 would show up on Lucy as Any Slot/Can Equip, meaning clickable from inventory only by the race/class combinations listed):
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Proof that it's been that way for 8 years at least:
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

This proof is undeniable, but the obvious argument could be made that the item was changed between late 2001 and early 2003. I'd like to know what kind of further proof we're looking for?

[Lazortag]

I stumbled upon a discussion on the "website that shall not be named" (eqclassic - oops) where they very liberally discuss it being used by monks, paladins, warrios, etc.. that's not proof but at least some indication that some people remember it that way! (some people who have no stake in it either way)

(here: http://www.eqclassic.org/forums/view...t=2075&p=32436)

[uygi]

Originally Posted by Lazortag [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I stumbled upon a discussion on the "website that shall not be named" (eqclassic - oops) where they very liberally discuss it being used by monks, paladins, warrios, etc.. that's not proof but at least some indication that some people remember it that way! (some people who have no stake in it either way)

(here: http://www.eqclassic.org/forums/view...t=2075&p=32436)

Total conjecture [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Asher]

Originally Posted by Azzbad [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

As opposed to having someone vendor recharge your locket of escape for a few hundred pp? I dont know the exact buyback but if its under 1k for the recharge (buying both) then its nothing as well. Both imbalanced, both nerfed/removed, both more abundant on this server like guises, manastones, rubicite, etc. Should follow the timeline with no drop and quest removal however with the proof provided it should be an equivalent to locket.

Vendor recharge already tested. It is just over 10k FYI.

Asher

[Azzbad]

Originally Posted by Asher [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Vendor recharge already tested. It is just over 10k FYI.

Asher

Interesting, thanks. Still worth it!

[uygi]

I believe that price on Locket is also a bug...

...Looked it up... seems to be...

Bug reporting that as well...

[Tobius]

So 10k for ring, assuming they change it.

How much was amulet to recharge on live?

[uygi]

Ring will be nodrop, so there really isn't much point in discussing it. I imagine it will stop being droppable on Friday.