Why are most of the artists in the USA democrats?

[Lulz~Sect]

What the matter anon? Scared of a stronk independent woman?
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[loramin]

Originally Posted by Rader [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Advocating murder is not cool, pal. Your calling BLM a force for equality exposes you as an idiot.

Originally Posted by Nibblewitz [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The original motives of BLM were great, but the movement was hijacked by the loudest and most ignorant voices.

Ok so either ...

A) Millions of people across the country came together to fight a documented problem (systematic abuse of minorities by police) and then ... magically all those millions of people got hoodwinked by a few loud and ignorant voices, and now they're all hateful violent people

or ...

B) Millions of people across the country came together to fight a documented problem (systematic abuse of minorities by police) and then ... a bunch of fearful conservatives, who by nature react against change (and particularly their loss of privilege), believed whatever nonsense Fox News used to scare them into thinking a peaceful rights movement was some hateful violent mob

I wonder which is more likely?

[Raavak]

Traditionally artists and the arts are supported by the rich and/or government, which puts them in the statist camp.

[Raavak]

Originally Posted by loramin [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

A) Millions...

I don't think this means what you think it means.

[hyejin]

Originally Posted by Raavak [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Traditionally artists and the arts are supported by the rich and/or government, which puts them in the statist camp.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Lhancelot]

Originally Posted by mickmoranis [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

This is classic liberalism.

"Why don't republicans just be cucks like us?"

How Mick?

I said, 'People can till lands and feed the nation all the while enjoying art and not being close-minded and bigoted.'

How is this classic liberalism by saying people can be responsible citizens, work hard, enjoy art all the while not being close-minded or bigoted?

How is having these traits being a cuck? Losing me here tbh.

[Lhancelot]

Originally Posted by loramin [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Ok so either ...

A) Millions of people across the country came together to fight a documented problem (systematic abuse of minorities by police) and then ... magically all those millions of people got hoodwinked by a few loud and ignorant voices, and now they're all hateful violent people

or ...

B) Millions of people across the country came together to fight a documented problem (systematic abuse of minorities by police) and then ... a bunch of fearful conservatives, who by nature react against change (and particularly their loss of privilege), believed whatever nonsense Fox News used to scare them into thinking a peaceful rights movement was some hateful violent mob

I wonder which is more likely?

But you can't deny that some people use this platform as a platform for hate and violence. I think many BLM supporters are members for good reason. I also believe there are some that use that platform to carry out anarchy and create dissension in the country. Some within the group are probably even government operatives.

It's really no different than how some white supremacists use Trump's poorly worded and presented speeches to justify their own violence and hate. Just because someone voted for trump doesn't mean they are racists, or that they are white supremacists.

I find Trump moronic and childlike, but never viewed him as a white supremacist or someone that supported white supremacy and neither did the entire country till he became president. The entire time this muppet was on TV doing The Apprentice, no one EVER said he was a white supremacist either. Suddenly now though, the common narrative of the far left is Trump is a white supremacist. How did he operate for so long with TV shows, with business ventures and go unnoticed as this supposed raving supremacist?

I am just saying different groups can take a platform and champion it as their own and manipulate what it originally stood for.

The US Government also has a history of doing this within our own country by the way, infiltrating political parties/social progressive groups and sowing seeds of dissension with lies creating distrust within as well as altering the perception of that groups actual meaning to those outside the group. Hihi COINTELPRO?

I honestly believe both sides of extremists, liberal and conservatives are most easily swayed by operations like COINTELPRO because they refuse to listen to one another instead they want to prove they are right and the other side is wrong. It's easy to manipulate people when you simply tell them what they want to hear in the first place.

[Rader]

Originally Posted by loramin [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Ok so either ...

A) Millions of people across the country came together to fight a documented problem (systematic abuse of minorities by police) and then ... magically all those millions of people got hoodwinked by a few loud and ignorant voices, and now they're all hateful violent people

or ...

B) Millions of people across the country came together to fight a documented problem (systematic abuse of minorities by police) and then ... a bunch of fearful conservatives, who by nature react against change (and particularly their loss of privilege), believed whatever nonsense Fox News used to scare them into thinking a peaceful rights movement was some hateful violent mob

I wonder which is more likely?

Libturdology 101: When you start to lose an argument, mention Fox News.

[hyejin]

Is libturd a parallel development to libtard, or serial after it?

[Lhancelot]

Originally Posted by hyejin [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Is libturd a parallel development to libtard, or serial after it?

I think it's considered even worse to be a "libturd" than a "libtard" but I could be wrong. We need a far right neocon extremist to clear this up.