Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Blue Community > Blue Server Chat

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-30-2017, 06:56 AM
paulgiamatti paulgiamatti is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: minneapolis belongs to me
Posts: 2,043
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cecily [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Quote:
Originally Posted by paulgiamatti [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
If high level farming is part of your criteria, go ranger.
Just wanted to laugh at this comment in specific.
Name something a shadow knight can farm that a ranger can't. If you pose that question the other way around you have the TT and FM cycles, for starters. Not to mention the added ease of just popping into a zone and instantly knowing whether something is up. Not to mention being able to farm tons of other stuff with efficiency like trade skill materials, Coldain quest items, etc. And again, it doesn't matter if a shadow knight can fear kite something when they're unequipped to FTE the mob or even know if the mob is up.
Last edited by paulgiamatti; 05-30-2017 at 07:01 AM..
  #2  
Old 05-29-2017, 10:43 PM
Cecily Cecily is offline
Planar Protector

Cecily's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 5,943
Default

60 Ranger's aren't a good solo farmer. Best farmer in the game for greens, blues.. I'd take fear kiting on anything and FD splits.

There's very little outdoors worthwhile to track, and there's very little dungeon content ranger friendly. I love rangers and hate SKs, but rangers are outmatched for big named hunting. Druids are better than either for sub 51 mobs, terrible at green farming.

Really what you wanna do is make an enc or shaman, sadly. Ideally enc, because their cost to be solo-worthy is a fraction of a shaman's.
  #3  
Old 05-29-2017, 11:02 PM
skarlorn skarlorn is offline
Banned


Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: The Misty Thicket
Posts: 4,862
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cecily [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Really what you wanna do is make an enc or shaman, sadly. Ideally enc, because their cost to be solo-worthy is a fraction of a shaman's.
i made a fortune soloing willowisps on my rogue in the teens

I would really like to see someone take rogue soloing to the next level
  #4  
Old 05-30-2017, 01:59 PM
Sirelk Sirelk is offline
Kobold


Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Midwest
Posts: 137
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by skarlorn [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I would really like to see someone take rogue soloing to the next level
I soloed a gnome rogue from 1-60 in about 10-11 months. Untwinked and no outside buffs.

I streamed most of it on Twitch. Sqid the soloing rogue.
  #5  
Old 05-30-2017, 08:29 AM
fadetree fadetree is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,957
Default

Yadda yadda.
OP, If your sole concern is getting to 50, then I don't know why you are talking about melee. What's so important about 50? Roll a chanter or necro. You'll get back to 30 and probably still hit 50 faster than either melee.
In my opinion, having to wonder whether you should play your Ranger or not means you shouldn't.
__________________
The Ancient Ranger
Awake again.
Last edited by fadetree; 05-30-2017 at 08:31 AM..
  #6  
Old 06-01-2017, 12:29 PM
MikeXG MikeXG is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 432
Default

Leaning towards doing the SK as it may be easier to find a pick up group and also just an easier class tonplay despite it being slower. With that I can than use the sk to farm plat and gear to truly twink the ranger with a fungi and maybe those epics way down the line. Because a decked out ranger sounds like a fun class to just run around with!
  #7  
Old 06-01-2017, 01:01 PM
Troxx Troxx is offline
Planar Protector

Troxx's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: The sands of DSM’s vagina
Posts: 4,284
Default

if your goal is to get xp and farm cash/loot

.... with both of these classes you're barking up the wrong tree

Casters (nec/ench/shm) own that aspect of the game. Rangers have their niche but their drawbacks. SKs? yep them too. Of the two ranger will kill faster but SK will be able to kill single mobs in all zones (fear + snare) that rangers may or may not be able to kill.

Both classes are fun.

Neither class is IDEAL.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist View Post
There is no fail message for FD.
https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...43&postcount=2



.
  #8  
Old 05-28-2017, 02:47 AM
Hitmonkey Hitmonkey is offline
Aviak


Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 80
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bummey [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Both can fear kite which ups their solo viability way over any other melee classes, even monks
LOL WHUT? No other melee class can come close to what monk can accomplish solo, it's not even close. it's Monk #1 and every other melee class a distance 3rd place.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Swish [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Ranger. SK's really can't solo too well at later levels.
This^

Had a main troll sk on live from classic to now, the higher you get up in level the more you fall behind in the ability to solo effectively -especially named -unless they're 20 or 30 levels below you.

Really should just pick a Caster class if you want to solo, the things you can do with a necro or Shaman (the two classes I played) is so far beyond what the few things you're going to be able to solo as a melee class.

Edit- if I had to pick I would definitely pick ranger, SK is incredibly gear dependent along with the other problems as you get up in level versus the Mobs
  #9  
Old 05-28-2017, 10:47 AM
paulgiamatti paulgiamatti is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: minneapolis belongs to me
Posts: 2,043
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hitmonkey [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
LOL WHUT? No other melee class can come close to what monk can accomplish solo, it's not even close. it's Monk #1 and every other melee class a distance 3rd place.
I've soloed Sir Lucan (both versions, with a full guard spawn) on my 60 ranger, self-buffed, without using a single clicky. I challenge any monk to do the same.
  #10  
Old 05-28-2017, 11:24 AM
American Standard American Standard is offline
Large Rat


Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 6
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by paulgiamatti [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I've soloed Sir Lucan (both versions, with a full guard spawn) on my 60 ranger, self-buffed, without using a single clicky. I challenge any monk to do the same.
Have also seen SK's do this. Time for monks to head back to the Ashy Order and learn a few things.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:05 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.