Russians™ putting nukes in Cuba

[Daywolf]

Originally Posted by Ahldagor [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

That's not chess

Did you just write that?? Welcome to Monday morning I guess. The wrong question to the right answer.

Originally Posted by Ahldagor [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

and you're still losing the game at a pathetic rate.

And here's what you've won!
https://youtu.be/BvUZijEuNDQ
Including a year supply of this!: https://youtu.be/4ItEhj9qVPw

[Daywolf]

Originally Posted by AzzarTheGod [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

War is unlikely. Claims to land are simply not made anymore, outside of the South China Sea and the USSR.

The imperialism that was the driving force behind world war is largely over, as of the last administration we are more in line with countries like Germany and the Netherlands.

Unless we are going to fight over legitimate claims to land (South China Sea, USSR territories) I fail to see how world war is possible?

Israel? They will be wiped off the map by 2070 as Sam Hyde told a TED talk.

Now touching back on this, you do realize those territories are in dispute, right? And not just those, but NK/SK, Japan, Australia (China still wants), Philippines, most of the middle-east, Europe is being invaded (the slow blade penetrates the shield), all the slaughter that has happened in Africa. Oh India/Pakistan, US/Mexico, Iran/Iraq (well was already given to them) the list can keep going, just off the top of my head real quick not even touching on South America.

Now if [most] any one of these were to heat up, the US would likely deal with it. Prob is we don't have the military to deal with a multi-front war, apart from nuking it. Heck, they have our fighting force wearing red high heals walking around for rape awareness while gutting all the veteran leadership and installing PC hacks. But we are not lacking territory to dispute, by far. But as it stands, it's about economic warfare, espionage, and especially proxy-wars. Even cyber warfare, of which we are about to lose as soon as we hand the internet over to Russia... and I wonder how much the Clinton Foundation made from that one. Yeah when I say Russia I mean UN, but the UN just does what Russian wants.

Likely one day you'll wake up and see many if not most of those places with troops advancing, when it becomes a true shooting war. The US will be in disarray, you might even wake up to gunfire or explosions as sleeper cells are flipped on. You might not even know what's going on for days unless you had some radios stashed inside some shielding, and not speaking of FM music box. By the time you ran out of food and water, most people are already out on the street moving like zombies. The govt won't be there for handouts, but to round you up, just like they did during Katrina with grabbing guns. There will be no help, just like 0bama went golfing during this flood going on right now, and Grandma Hillary sleeps.

No, they won't nuke us (apart from EMP's) most likely, we'll kill ourselves in a matter of weeks. They got us all divided, out for ourselves or our skin color. This is by design, dude. China want's their land here. The world want's our farms and oil and as part of the North American trade block for slave labor. imo likely scenario, only my brief mention of it for forum readability sake. Is Nuclear War Impossible? Rare link, AJ in the flesh, but a good report, no rantings, he behaves [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

As for 2070, meh. More like 2017-2024 there abouts. btw Germany has one of the most un-free media in the world, completely scripted with no room for backtalk in any form. You're usage of "imperialism" is usually used as an idealistic hate slap against the US, not sure of your context there.

Oh yeah, as far as our farmland, then maybe not. Our farmlands are seriously contaminated, thanks to genetically modified crops which is banned in other countries like Russia. Might be worth burning too, not sure.

[phacemeltar]

it wouldnt be a war, so much as a massive depopulation of the lower class. modern military doesnt need massive amounts of humans to wage destruction, everything is automated.

also i think its important to point out that the planet cannot much longer sustain population at this rate of human "progression". did you think the genome "project" was to help you make superior offspring? my theory is that they are cataloging evolution so as to help build a fresh "server".

[Daywolf]

Originally Posted by big_ole_jpn [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

This part of ur post was good. Stop here next time

Too true. The rest is just meh propaganda machine stuff. Sure, not possible, under socialism etc. Everything as it is - is the way it is - out of the need for control. It's a sick corrupt world.

[phacemeltar]

Originally Posted by big_ole_jpn [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

This part of ur post was good. Stop here next time

imagine if noah's ark was able to fit on a flash drive [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Daywolf]

Originally Posted by phacemeltar [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

imagine if noah's ark was able to fit on a flash drive [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

There is a possibility that the whole universe in on a flash drive.

[R Flair]

Originally Posted by phacemeltar [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

it wouldnt be a war, so much as a massive depopulation of the lower class. modern military doesnt need massive amounts of humans to wage destruction, everything is automated.

also i think its important to point out that the planet cannot much longer sustain population at this rate of human "progression". did you think the genome "project" was to help you make superior offspring? my theory is that they are cataloging evolution so as to help build a fresh "server".

This is demonstrably false. Back when every person couldn't look at satellite imagery and see just how little of the world was populated, that kind of ignorance was acceptable. Today it isn't.

There is room on this planet to not only feed but to house many, many times the current population. I urge you to take a little google trip and consider the fact that the vast (like 90%) of the inhabitable region of planet is actually wilderness (yes, with some roads) and much of it fertile ground.

I could go into what little I know (or even want to know) of the sickos behind eugenics in the last century, but suffice it to say they are the ones behind this narrative that you are parroting. Its wrong, and its sick.

[phacemeltar]

Originally Posted by R Flair [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

This is demonstrably false. Back when every person couldn't look at satellite imagery and see just how little of the world was populated, that kind of ignorance was acceptable. Today it isn't.

There is room on this planet to not only feed but to house many, many times the current population. I urge you to take a little google trip and consider the fact that the vast (like 90%) of the inhabitable region of planet is actually wilderness (yes, with some roads) and much of it fertile ground.

I could go into what little I know (or even want to know) of the sickos behind eugenics in the last century, but suffice it to say they are the ones behind this narrative that you are parroting. Its wrong, and its sick.

im not just talking about population increases. deforestation, mining, overuse of resources.. all are contributing to the destruction of the world as it has grown our culture. although i guess it should be said that the planet will probably be here long after the humans are gone, whether its in one piece or many.

oh, also the introduction of extinct and fictitious creatures into the biome due to cloning and genetics tampering.

[Daywolf]

Originally Posted by phacemeltar [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

im not just talking about population increases. deforestation, mining, overuse of resources.. all are contributing to the destruction of the world as it has grown our culture. although i guess it should be said that the planet will probably be here long after the humans are gone, whether its in one piece or many.

Nah it could double before we even begin to drain resources. There really is no population issue here. It's govt issues. You just cant manage/allow energy production, farming and clean water while most/all of the nations are so deeply corrupt. If it were not so, we'd have cold fusion energy for all, mining resources in space, an end to hunger and thirst. Instead we have war, famine and death, thanks to the globalist elite that gain great power out of misery. They have written about it, conference it, invested into it, that's what they do.

[Nibblewitz]

Luckily after WW2, U.S., Great Britain and Russia decided that Africa and Asia should be a "hinterlands" where cheap labor and resources can be found.

There's still plenty damage left to do.