State of Red 1999

[Colgate]

Originally Posted by Ragnaros [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I do not recommend this server, stay far away from it. There is no raid pvp and its currently peaking at 100 people primetime when the top guild isn't raiding. The top guild raids with 150 people uncontested and the next thing to competition is lower guilds that cant even field 20. Server is dead and not worth rolling, the community is also very toxic. Stay far away.

server peaks at 100 players but we raid with 150? wut

also side note: this poster is currently suspended for upwards of 8-12 months for repeated rule violations

[Colgate]

Originally Posted by Grandbeard [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I am all for a PvP server with Players. In your opinion, would cross server trades boost the player base again?

slowly but surely yes

[Colgate]

Originally Posted by Speedi [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Everything you said is probably accurate. But one thing that would help your server is for people to stop the trolling and griefing the new blood on your server. Without that new blood, red99 *WILL* die. Myself I have *never* played on red99. But I read the forums. I know everything is not true, I am not that naive. But when you have 15-20 people all saying the same thing, some of it has to be true. Maybe with your guilds influence on red99 you guys could help with the griefing and trolling. Maybe new players could ask empire for assistance to run a griefer out the zone. That's an example of course. Maybe you could come up with something even better. Just a thought! [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

the only way we could "run a griefer out of the zone" would be to make an army of twinked alts to cover all level ranges

or people could actually listen to the very commonly spoken advice of "level in zones other than unrest, mistmoore, and city of mist"

in any case, most people who cite red99 griefing refer to higher level pvp taking place.. at which point you just simply don't like pvp to consider getting attacked grief

[Ragnaros]

Originally Posted by Colgate [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

server peaks at 100 players but we raid with 150? wut

also side note: this poster is currently suspended for upwards of 8-12 months for repeated rule violations

is your reading comprehension lacking? maybe you should of attended those classes instead of raiding on a dead server. My quote clearly says 100 when top guild isnt raiding
no competition and avatar of war still aint dieing
cringe dude go outside

[Colgate]

sorry assumed it was a copy/paste of this post

Originally Posted by Ragnaros [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I do not recommend this server, stay far away from it. There is no raid pvp and its currently peaking at 100 people primetime. The top guild raids with 150 people uncontested and the next thing to competition is lower guilds that cant even field 20. Server is dead and not worth rolling, the community is also very toxic. Stay far away.

[Baugi]

Originally Posted by Colgate [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

in any case, most people who cite red99 griefing refer to higher level pvp taking place.. at which point you just simply don't like pvp to consider getting attacked grief

"higher level pvp" on the server is pretty much all griefing now, yes. I've never seen someone initiate PVP with the goal of contesting a camp or taking a spawn or even pocketing the guy's wallet. It's all just breaking up groups and getting easy kill messages because EQ PVE requires too much resource investment to be PVP'ing simultaneously.

[Ragnaros]

try blue today
youll get just as much pvp as red has

[Colgate]

gettin a good chortle of anti-red99 ragnaros now that he's suspended for 8 months

[jpetrick]

Didn't play on red long enough to experience raiding but I did take my monk up to 50. People were friendly & generally nice.
My biggest complaint is that the players I ran into were just generally bad at the game, in both pvp and pve. I'm sure it would have been better if I took the toon all the way to 60 but when you go from a near best in slot blue monk to a monk in cloth again it just isn't enjoyable and I couldn't stick with it.

[Ragnaros]

Originally Posted by Colgate [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

gettin a good chortle of anti-red99 ragnaros now that he's suspended for 8 months

yea man my level 46 shaman got shipped to guantanamo bay for a week, my life is in shambles