Bernie Sanders is a bad ass

[captnamazing]

I'll vote for Donald Sanders u can rest assured Bernie Trump Clinton is my president elect

[iruinedyourday]

The diff between line & orrur here is one is talking about socialism & the other is talking about communism.

Education boys & girls.

[AzzarTheGod]

Originally Posted by iruinedyourday [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The diff between line & orrur here is one is talking about socialism & the other is talking about communism.

Education boys & girls.

I like how Lune kept playing ball allowing Orruar to insinuate that somehow socialism amounts to a form of communism. What a cool and normal pal.

[Orruar]

Originally Posted by AzzarTheGod [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I like how Lune kept playing ball allowing Orruar to insinuate that somehow socialism amounts to a form of communism. What a cool and normal pal.

Collectivism is collectivism. Democratic socialism is the camel's nose under the tent to wedge in authoritarian control over a people.

[Alenon]

Fear leads to anger. Anger leads to hate. Hate leads to suffering. Suffering leads to socialism. Socialism leads to communism. Communism leads to the dark side. they shortened it for the movie :P

[maskedmelon]

Two serious questions for our socialists:

1. Why is it in the best interest of the people for government to subsidize failure?

2. Once we've adequately seized the assets of the most detested minority, to whom will we export the inefficiencies of government assuming we do not wish to internalize them and the resulting poverty?

[Kyff]

Originally Posted by maskedmelon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Two serious questions for our socialists:

1. Why is it in the best interest of the people for government to subsidize failure?

2. Once we've adequately seized the assets of the most detested minority, to whom will we export the inefficiencies of government assuming we do not wish to internalize them and the resulting poverty?

Answer 1
Because the so called failures might be tempted to take up arms and fight for a fair share of wealth if all the government does is protecting the few haves.

Answer 2
The fundament of your question is worng. If done correctly taxation does not "seize the assets" but rather reduces them. Even with the inefficiencies inherent in large operations the result should not be poverty but a more balanced distribution of wealth.

[maskedmelon]

Originally Posted by Kyff [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Answer 1
Because the so called failures might be tempted to take up arms and fight for a fair share of wealth if all the government does is protecting the few haves.

Answer 2
The fundament of your question is worng. If done correctly taxation does not "seize the assets" but rather reduces them. Even with the inefficiencies inherent in large operations the result should not be poverty but a more balanced distribution of wealth.

1. I said failure not failures. I was referring to the concept (as one might refer to poverty, intolerance or bigotry) not people. However if you are arguing it is reasonable for society to furnish resources to an entity out of fear of violence by that entity, would it not be more pragmatic to eliminate said entity? You are advocating racketeering.

To my original question of failure (more specifically failed behaviors), I've several additional questions:

1. If a flame is struggling to catch on the damp siding of your home, do you pile dry kindling next to it in hope the flame will relocate?

2. If your child habitually fails to meet his/ her curfew, do you upgrade their iPhone as incentive to better manage their time?

3. If an employee embezzles do you raise his salary?

4. If man commits rape, do you furnish him a concubine?




2. Any reduction in assets is exacted via seizure whether in part or in whole. Taxation is not voluntary and is executed under penalty of law. Look at any socialist oasis and you will see that they all have one (or more) of three things:

1. Ever increasing effective tax rates
2. Soaring debt
3. Robust economic protectionist policies

The inefficiency inherent to organizations that are funded via extortion necessarily results in poverty, whether internalized or exported.

[Filthy_Pagan]

Originally Posted by maskedmelon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Two serious questions for our socialists:

1. Why is it in the best interest of the people for government to subsidize failure?

2. Once we've adequately seized the assets of the most detested minority, to whom will we export the inefficiencies of government assuming we do not wish to internalize them and the resulting poverty?

I think this video will sum it up nicely.

We need a nordic model government. Homogeneous population and socialism.

[sOurDieSel]

Originally Posted by Filthy_Pagan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Homogeneous population

Dat be waycist yo gibsmedat white-wooooman