End of the rotation?

[zanderklocke]

As I said before in the FAP forums:

"All I know is, when The Undertaker kidnapped Stephanie, he crossed a line. He may have a beef with me Zanderr, or Triple H, or Vince McMahon even, and that is fair game, but to bring Stephanie into this, when she had ZERO to do with ANYTHING AT ALL with the controversy over last week's grudge match between him and me, he has CROSSED A LINE."

[Raev]

See, this is what I mean. You guys killed Hoshkar during IB/TMO's suspension. I'm sure that was the best possible circumstances, but still: PD is about a million times easier than Hoshkar. During the open beta raids we were trying stuff with 15.

Again: your guild was abused so badly by Zeelot's TMO that you do not want to compete. Your primary goal in these negotiations has been to go FFA and inflict some of that abuse on the smaller guilds. What are you going to do when you fail there too? My guess is AT picks up a few of BDA's better/more sane players.

[khanable]

hay guys whats going on in this thread

[Aadill]

FFA in Class C
FFA in Class R
FFA in FFA

[Ele]

Originally Posted by zanderklocke [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

As I said before in the FAP forums:

"All I know is, when The Undertaker kidnapped Stephanie, he crossed a line. He may have a beef with me Zanderr, or Triple H, or Vince McMahon even, and that is fair game, but to bring Stephanie into this, when she had ZERO to do with ANYTHING AT ALL with the controversy over last week's grudge match between him and me, he has CROSSED A LINE."

best post in this thread

[wycca]

Originally Posted by kaev [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Serious miscasting of shit going on in that post. How about the "pixel lust" of small guilds riding the coattails of larger guilds so that they can distribute pixels from easier & more desirable targets amongst a smaller pool than if they were in a guild capable of actually doing all the content?

You want the loots? Man up and form a large enough force to actually kill the tough mobs and (here's the key part[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] then share the "loot pinata" pixels amongst all of the players required to actually earn your place at the table.

The greed and the abuse here are coming 99% from the smaller guilds crying because they want guaranteed pixels at the expense of the players in the larger guilds.

So this is what the PR machine is going to say?

Let's be 100% clear here. You make the gatekeeper to the juiciest tier the 2nd hardest mob in the game, require 24hr kills of it within 1hr, and in order to get in, you have to kill a FFA version of it - not a class R version.

Really?

No, you created a protected pixel wall designed to keep the small guilds from killing VS (which can be done with 2 groups), Inny (3 groups), etc etc.

This isn't some - "they're abusing the system" proposal (and they weren't, they signed up jointly for mobs they couldn't solo kill, alliances were for an 8hr period overnight), it's 100% about protecting the best pixels in the game from competition and trying to secure them for BDA/Taken/Divinity without having to share.

Don't spew some noble bullshit when it's quite clear that this was some Machivaellian proposal designed to benefit BDA/Taken/Divinity and protect their pixel welfare.

[Blaza]

Originally Posted by wycca [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

So this is what the PR machine is going to say?

Let's be 100% clear here. You make the gatekeeper to the juiciest tier the 2nd hardest mob in the game, require 24hr kills of it within 1hr, and in order to get in, you have to kill a FFA version of it - not a class R version.

Really?

No, you created a protected pixel wall designed to keep the small guilds from killing VS (which can be done with 2 groups), Inny (3 groups), etc etc.

This isn't some - "they're abusing the system" proposal (and they weren't, they signed up jointly for mobs they couldn't solo kill, alliances were for an 8hr period overnight), it's 100% about protecting the best pixels in the game from competition and trying to secure them for BDA/Taken/Divinity without having to share.

Don't spew some noble bullshit when it's quite clear that this was some Machivaellian proposal designed to benefit BDA/Taken/Divinity and protect their pixel welfare.

Its an R Gorenaire.

[MaksimMazor]

lol

[arsenalpow]

Cry havoc and let slip the dogs of war.

[wycca]

Originally Posted by Blaza [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Its an R Gorenaire.

OMG, this makes it so much more acceptable! [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

In order to kill a 2-groupable mob, you still have to kill Gore. Nobody with half a brain would think this isn't about pixels with that rule.